18.01.2013 Views

VI Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation.pdf - Blog Science ...

VI Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation.pdf - Blog Science ...

VI Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation.pdf - Blog Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HODGKIN'S DISEASE: AUTOLOGOUS BMT FOLLOWING RELAPSE<br />

AFTER PRIMARY CHEMOTHERAPY<br />

G.L. Phillips, MD<br />

Leukemia/<strong>Bone</strong> <strong>Marrow</strong> <strong>Transplantation</strong> Program of British Columbia:<br />

Division of Hematology, Vancouver General Hospital, British Columbia<br />

Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia,<br />

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Myeloablative therapy and autologous bone marrow transplant (AuBMT)<br />

regimens are widely used for patients with Hodgkin's disease.l However, the<br />

optimal time in the course of a patient's disease to employ such therapy is unclear.<br />

2<br />

While this uncertainty is chiefly due to a lack of randomized trials, 3<br />

this<br />

statement is simplistic, as it is arguable whether AuBMT regimens have been<br />

developed to the extent that such trials would be appropriate to test this question.<br />

4<br />

Alternatively, a meta-analysis that addresses this issue has been reported; 5<br />

while of interest, the meta-analysis is based on a series of assumptions and is<br />

therefore sensitive to the accuracy of those assumptions.<br />

In any case, we believe that the optimal time to employ AuBMT is at the<br />

first sign of failure of optimal primary chemotherapy - either failure to achieve<br />

an initial complete remission ("primary induction failure") or first relapse - before<br />

any salvage chemotherapy has been given. (Since there is no reasonable alternative<br />

to the use of AuBMT for primary induction failure patients, this situation<br />

will not be discussed further herein.)<br />

More controversy exists regarding subsequent treatment in those patients<br />

who achieve a documented complete remission before relapsing. Conventional<br />

salvage chemotherapy has a degree of efficacy6 which, although limited, may<br />

produce very satisfactory results in patients with an initial lymphoma-free interval<br />

of > 12 months. 7<br />

Moreover, it is at least possible that the apparently superior<br />

results of AuBMT regimens are due to patient selection 4<br />

; if so, it is possible that<br />

AuBMT should be reserved until after conventional salvage chemotherapy fails.<br />

Alternatively, conventional salvage therapy could be used to produce a state of<br />

"minimal residual disease" ("sensitive relapse") before the use of AuBMT.<br />

However, if one accepts that use of AuBMT regimens at some point after relapse<br />

is optimal, utilization of AuBMT at the time of first relapse is an attractive<br />

option as it exposes relatively few patients who could be cured by safer, more<br />

conventional therapies to the intrinsic risks of AuBMT regimens 7<br />

; its use only in<br />

patients whose lymphoma-free interval is < 12 months emphasizes this strategy,<br />

which permits treatment of a relatively healthy patient who is neither heavily<br />

pretreated (with associated severe organ dysfunction) nor has an extensive<br />

population of highly resistant tumor stem cells. However, we admit that this position<br />

is controversial^ and rather than contrive various comparisons of pub-<br />

86 SIXTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AUTOLOGOUS BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!