VI Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation.pdf - Blog Science ...
VI Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation.pdf - Blog Science ...
VI Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation.pdf - Blog Science ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
RADIOIMMUNOTHERAPY FOR BONE MARROW<br />
TRANSPLANTATION PATIENTS<br />
Huibert M. Vriesendorp,* Karel A. Dicke,** Syed M. Quadri*<br />
* The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center<br />
Houston, Texas<br />
** Houston Cancer Institute<br />
Houston, Texas<br />
GENERAL PERSPECTIVE<br />
Radioimmunoglobulin therapy (RIT) is considered feasible and promising<br />
since the late 1950's but remains an investigational new cancer treatment modality<br />
till today. The relatively slow progress in RIT is caused by its complexity requiring<br />
participation of many different scientific disciplines and allocation of<br />
considerable resources. Continued interest in RIT appears justified for several<br />
reasons. RIT is an active single agent in patients with relapsed Hodgkin's disease<br />
or lymphoma.' 3<br />
<strong>Bone</strong> marrow damage is the only side effect of RIT regularly<br />
observed in human patients so far, which can be corrected by a bone marrow<br />
transplant or hemopoietic growth factors u<br />
~ 5<br />
. The most important remaining<br />
limitation to RIT is the relatively low uptake of radiolabeled antibody by tumor<br />
tissues in human patients. Currently, the best RIT reagents deliver approximately<br />
20 Gy to tumor in one week in human patients 6. Promising results have<br />
been obtained in preclinical animal models, indicating the possibility of tumor<br />
dose escalations in human patients by a factor 5 M<br />
.<br />
IMMUNOGLOBULIN PERMUTATIONS<br />
Theoretical considerations indicate that radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies<br />
deliver higher tumor doses than similarly labeled polyclonal antibodies. However,<br />
non-specific binding of the murine monoclonal antibodies or immune<br />
complexes to normal human liver prevents the realization of this principle in<br />
vivo.3 Enzymatic removal of the CF fragment will decrease liver uptake. The resulting<br />
F(ab')2 fragment will target the tumor, but rapidly split in two F(ab')<br />
fragments. This fragment is quickly released by tumor and taken up by kidney<br />
or excreted in urine 9<br />
. F(ab')2 fragments are good diagnostic reagents, but have<br />
tumor dwell times that are too short for the delivery of significant doses of radiation.<br />
Removal of the Fc fragment decreases the immunogenicity of the<br />
radioimmunoconjugate and increases the possibilities for repeated RIT cycles.<br />
Stabilized F(ab')2 fragments, in which the labile interchain disulfide bridges are<br />
replaced by more stable thioether linkages, appear to be more promising RIT<br />
reagents in experimental animal models and need further analysis in human pa-<br />
f j g j ^ g (9, and Quadri et al., submitted for publication)<br />
Another method to circumvent the application of the full immunogenic, Fc<br />
bearing mouse immunoglobulin is the use of "humanized" monoclonal antibod-<br />
98 SIXTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AUTOLOGOUS BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION