18.01.2013 Views

VI Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation.pdf - Blog Science ...

VI Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation.pdf - Blog Science ...

VI Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation.pdf - Blog Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RADIOIMMUNOTHERAPY FOR BONE MARROW<br />

TRANSPLANTATION PATIENTS<br />

Huibert M. Vriesendorp,* Karel A. Dicke,** Syed M. Quadri*<br />

* The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center<br />

Houston, Texas<br />

** Houston Cancer Institute<br />

Houston, Texas<br />

GENERAL PERSPECTIVE<br />

Radioimmunoglobulin therapy (RIT) is considered feasible and promising<br />

since the late 1950's but remains an investigational new cancer treatment modality<br />

till today. The relatively slow progress in RIT is caused by its complexity requiring<br />

participation of many different scientific disciplines and allocation of<br />

considerable resources. Continued interest in RIT appears justified for several<br />

reasons. RIT is an active single agent in patients with relapsed Hodgkin's disease<br />

or lymphoma.' 3<br />

<strong>Bone</strong> marrow damage is the only side effect of RIT regularly<br />

observed in human patients so far, which can be corrected by a bone marrow<br />

transplant or hemopoietic growth factors u<br />

~ 5<br />

. The most important remaining<br />

limitation to RIT is the relatively low uptake of radiolabeled antibody by tumor<br />

tissues in human patients. Currently, the best RIT reagents deliver approximately<br />

20 Gy to tumor in one week in human patients 6. Promising results have<br />

been obtained in preclinical animal models, indicating the possibility of tumor<br />

dose escalations in human patients by a factor 5 M<br />

.<br />

IMMUNOGLOBULIN PERMUTATIONS<br />

Theoretical considerations indicate that radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies<br />

deliver higher tumor doses than similarly labeled polyclonal antibodies. However,<br />

non-specific binding of the murine monoclonal antibodies or immune<br />

complexes to normal human liver prevents the realization of this principle in<br />

vivo.3 Enzymatic removal of the CF fragment will decrease liver uptake. The resulting<br />

F(ab')2 fragment will target the tumor, but rapidly split in two F(ab')<br />

fragments. This fragment is quickly released by tumor and taken up by kidney<br />

or excreted in urine 9<br />

. F(ab')2 fragments are good diagnostic reagents, but have<br />

tumor dwell times that are too short for the delivery of significant doses of radiation.<br />

Removal of the Fc fragment decreases the immunogenicity of the<br />

radioimmunoconjugate and increases the possibilities for repeated RIT cycles.<br />

Stabilized F(ab')2 fragments, in which the labile interchain disulfide bridges are<br />

replaced by more stable thioether linkages, appear to be more promising RIT<br />

reagents in experimental animal models and need further analysis in human pa-<br />

f j g j ^ g (9, and Quadri et al., submitted for publication)<br />

Another method to circumvent the application of the full immunogenic, Fc<br />

bearing mouse immunoglobulin is the use of "humanized" monoclonal antibod-<br />

98 SIXTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AUTOLOGOUS BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!