VI Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation.pdf - Blog Science ...
VI Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation.pdf - Blog Science ...
VI Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation.pdf - Blog Science ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
tors both for progression-free survival and for overall survival. Probability values<br />
for these five variables are respectively: (1) soft-tissue site (P=.047 and .013);<br />
(2) liver site (P=.007 and .007); (3) prior chemotherapy (P=.004 and .008); (4) disease-free<br />
interval from mastectomy to metastasis < 1 year (P=.027 and .047); (5)<br />
non-caucasian race (P=.0001 and .0002).<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
The observed overall complete remission rate of 55% is twice the (1%-21%)<br />
range observed using conventional chemotherapy for this unfavorable subgroup<br />
of patients. 0,2<br />
' 3<br />
' 4<br />
' 5<br />
' 6<br />
'<br />
This report identifies a subset of patients who benefit the most as having 1-2<br />
sites of disease primarily distributed to parenchymal lung or regional draining<br />
lymph nodes. Prognostic Factors predicting for poor survival by this analysis<br />
include liver site, soft-tissue site, >1 disease site, prior chemotherapy exposure,<br />
short DFI, and non-caucasian race.<br />
In this report progression-free survival and overall survival curves reveal a<br />
plateau that persists at 5 year follow-up. The encouraging observed "overall<br />
complete response" rate in this report (55%) is equivalent to most other reported<br />
high-dose protocols (range 20-64%). wwo,n,i2,i3,i4,i5> other high-dose protocols<br />
exclude patients over age 55, patients with stable disease, and report an early<br />
toxic death rate of range 3%-40%. (8<br />
' 9<br />
' 14<br />
' ,6<br />
' I7<br />
' ,8<br />
- 19<br />
> Our low mortality of 8% while including<br />
patients up to age 62 (in the pre-growth factor era), supports a double<br />
high-dose approach.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1. Falkson G, Gelman R, Falkson C, et al: Factors Predicting for Response, Time to<br />
Treatment Failure, and Survival in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated<br />
With DAVTH: A Prospective Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study. J Clin<br />
Oncol 9:2153-2161,1991.<br />
2. Vogel C, Azevedo S, Hilsenbeck S, et al: Survival After First Recurrence of Breast<br />
Cancer. Cancer 70:129-135,1992.<br />
3. Mick R, Colin B, Antman K, et al: Diverse prognosis in metastatic breast cancer: Who<br />
should be offered alternative initial therapies? Breast Cancer Research and Treatment<br />
13:33-38,1989.<br />
4. Kiang D, Gay J: A randomized trial of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy in<br />
advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 313:1241-1246,1985.<br />
5. Holmes F, Yap H: Mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, and fluorouracil in metastatic<br />
breast cancer unresponsive to hormonal therapy. Cancer 59:1992-1999,1987.<br />
6. Livingston R, Schulman S: Combination chemotherapy and systemic irradiation<br />
consolidation for poor prognosis breast cancer. Cancer 59:1249-1254,1987.<br />
7. Dunphy F, Spitzer G, Buzdar A, et al: Treatment of estrogen receptor-negative or<br />
hormonally refractory breast cancer with double high-dose chemotherapy intensification<br />
and bone marrow support. J Clin Oncol 8:1207-1216,1990.<br />
8. Peters W, Shpall E: High-dose combination alkylating agents with bone marrow<br />
support as initial treatment for metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 6:1368-1376,<br />
1988.<br />
9. Antman K, Ayash L, Elias A, et al: A phase II study of high-dose cyclophosphamide,<br />
thiotepa, and carboplatin with autologous marrow support in women with measurable<br />
advanced breast cancer responding to standard-dose therapy. J Clin Oncol<br />
10:102-110,1992.<br />
320<br />
SIXTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AUTOLOGOUS BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION