VI Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation.pdf - Blog Science ...
VI Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation.pdf - Blog Science ...
VI Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation.pdf - Blog Science ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Higher dose carboplatin with marrow rescue has been even more effective<br />
and the thrombocytopenia seen with lower doses is eliminated by the re-infusion<br />
of cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cells. Shea et al have shown that<br />
carboplatin can be escalated to 2000 mg/m 2<br />
with marrow rescue. He described<br />
in this single agent study, a response rate in patients with refractory ovarian carcinoma<br />
of 55% 7<br />
.<br />
Alkylating agents including melphalan, cyclophosphamide and thio-TEPA<br />
are active in ovarian carcinoma and these agents have also been successfully<br />
dose escalated with marrow rescue 8<br />
- 9<br />
. Stoppa reported a 75% response rate for<br />
patients treated with high dose melphalan who had failed cisplatin induction<br />
therapy. In this study 15/35 patients were alive and disease-free at a median follow-up<br />
of 23 months 10<br />
. Along the same lines Dauplat found a 36% 2 year disease-free<br />
survival for similarly treated patients failing standard induction<br />
therapy 18<br />
. This compares to a median survival of 6-9 months for other salvage<br />
therapies available to patients and a 2 year survival of less than 15%. Based on in<br />
vitro studies demonstrating synergism between cisplatin and either cyclophosphamide<br />
or thio-TEPA in ovarian carcinoma, investigators at Duke University<br />
performed and completed a pilot study of high dose cisplatin, cyclophosphamide<br />
and thio-TEPA with bone marrow rescue in ovarian carcinoma. Of the first<br />
9 patients who had failed at least 2 prior regimens, there was a 78% response<br />
rate, documented surgically even though all had progressed after receiving<br />
cisplatin 12<br />
.<br />
Similarly, mitoxantrone has been shown by Alberts et al to be the most effective<br />
anti-tumor agent at high doses against resistant ovarian carcinoma from<br />
patients in vitro 13<br />
. Because of this and the fact that the drug is nearly devoid of<br />
non-hematopoietic toxicity at conventional doses, several groups have completed<br />
studies of high dose mitoxantrone in patients with refractory ovarian<br />
carcinoma 1415<br />
. Mulder combined either cyclophosphamide or melphalan with<br />
high dose mitoxantrone. Of their initial 6 patients there was a 66% complete remission<br />
rate of up to and beyond 36 months post-therapy. A trial conducted at<br />
Loyola University treated 25 patients with primarily breast and ovarian carcinoma<br />
and demonstrated an overall response rate for ovarian carcinoma of 83%<br />
with 80% of the responses complete remissions 16<br />
. The complete remissions have<br />
lasted up to, and in fact longer than, 30 months, with the median survival for<br />
this heavily pre-treated group of 12 months.<br />
SURVEY RESULTS<br />
Based on enhanced responses to high dose chemotherapy with ABMT,<br />
many U.S. groups are now performing transplants for advanced ovarian carcinoma.<br />
Because of the small numbers treated to date at each center, very little has<br />
been published. Yet as in the pilot studies as above, it is the feeling of many investigators<br />
that this form of therapy is effective in treating end stage disease, and<br />
that this therapy should be used earlier in the course of the disease to improve<br />
results, as has been done for patients with leukemia and lymphoma. To provide<br />
additional support for this therapy in this country, a survey of the U.S. programs<br />
known to be active was conducted in November, 1992. The survey was designed<br />
to determine the number of patients treated, the regimens used, the remission<br />
status, several prognostic factors, as well as response rates and durations (Table<br />
SIXTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AUTOLOGOUS BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION 193