30.01.2013 Views

Copyright by Gregory Krauss 2007 - The University of Texas at Austin

Copyright by Gregory Krauss 2007 - The University of Texas at Austin

Copyright by Gregory Krauss 2007 - The University of Texas at Austin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

opinion <strong>of</strong> the text. Lister suggested several changes which made the text less<br />

confront<strong>at</strong>ional but probably more likely to garner support from St<strong>at</strong>e Department<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficials for Korean democracy. 64 Kim accepted Lister’s changes, and he gave the<br />

speech to a standing room crowd on January 23, 1985. <strong>The</strong> speech was a “gre<strong>at</strong><br />

success” and was met <strong>by</strong> “much applause” Lister reported to Abrams th<strong>at</strong> day. 65 After<br />

the speech, Kim lunched <strong>at</strong> the eighth floor restaurant with various <strong>of</strong>ficials, mainly<br />

from the East Asian and human rights bureaus. 66<br />

Soon after the speech Kim returned to South Korea and was placed under<br />

house arrest. His return, however, helped intensify the pro-democracy movement. 67<br />

At the human rights bureau, Lister became “inund<strong>at</strong>ed” with visits from Korean<br />

democr<strong>at</strong>ic groups. 68 U.S. policy towards the South Korean regime finally started to<br />

change. Ambassador David Walker, who had refused to meet with the democr<strong>at</strong>ic<br />

opposition, was replaced in 1986. 69 In February 1987, Assistant Secretary <strong>of</strong> St<strong>at</strong>e<br />

Gaston Sigur, Wolfowitz’s successor <strong>at</strong> the East Asian bureau gave a speech in which<br />

he called on the Korean government to democr<strong>at</strong>ize or face losing U.S. support. 70<br />

Sigur’s comments were followed <strong>by</strong> more U.S. pressure. 71 In June 1987, Chun agreed<br />

to relinquish the South Korean presidency and allow direct elections. 72 Kim Dae Jung<br />

ran in those elections and lost, but democracy in South Korea had been largely<br />

restored.<br />

James Fowler has written th<strong>at</strong> U.S. public pressure was one <strong>of</strong> the keys to<br />

Chun’s decision to permit elections in 1987. 73 Attempting to explain U.S. policy,<br />

110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!