Copyright by Gregory Krauss 2007 - The University of Texas at Austin

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Paul Wolfowitz agreed to a meeting. 126 The choice for regional bureaus was thus either to allow the human rights bureau to manage relationships with opposition leaders, or to engage the leaders themselves. If the former, the human rights bureau controlled an important aspect of diplomacy; if the regional bureau agreed to a meeting, then the human rights bureau won a policy victory. Either way, the human rights bureau gained. Another of Lister’s contributions, also furthered by his contacts with opposition leaders, was to help maintain the Carter administration’s focus on individual instances of human rights abuses. 127 The Reagan administration made a show of shifting away from dealing with individual human rights problems to the development of democratic institutions. As part of this approach, in December 1983, the administration created the National Endowment for Democracy, a privately funded corporation with the goal of strengthening democratic institutions worldwide. 128 Nevertheless, according to Abrams, Lister kept the policy balanced, reminding Reagan officials that “no one will believe you mean it if you don’t actually protect the people and work with the people who are trying to achieve these things.” 129 Abrams expressed early in his tenure that there was more continuity between the Carter and Reagan human rights policy than critics believed. 130 To the extent that this turned out to be true, Lister may deserve some of the credit. Lister kept the bureau as honest as possible—focused on human rights abuses wherever they 83
occurred. Lister’s own toughness and dedication to human rights would have made it difficult for Abrams, inside or outside the bureau, to treat human rights lightly, so long as Lister remained on staff. Contrary to perceptions that Abrams only considered human rights as a wedge against Communism, Abrams did care about victims of right-wing oppression. “It’s going to be a terrific place when these guys throw Pinochet out,” Abrams scribbled on one of Lister’s memorandums after one fruitful dialogue with Chilean dissidents in November 1983. 131 In July 1985, Abrams left the human rights bureau to become Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs. Lister continued a close working relationship with Abrams’ successor, Richard Schifter. Lister’s work, though, was less critical to the bureau as he grew older—mainly because the process he had furthered of institutionalizing human rights had been successful. Lister continued many of the same activities, but he also began to act as something of a bureau historian. “George was as much as anyone the institutional memory of the Human Rights Bureau,” said Harold Koh, leader of the bureau from 1998 to 2001. 132 “There is a lot of stuff that is not written down anywhere and he knew it. That was very valuable in making sure that we were staying on course.” 133 Impact on Human Rights Movement Both human rights country reports and the State Department’s human rights bureau were critical pieces of the institutional architecture that helped to create a 84
Page 1 and 2:
Copyright by Gregory Krauss 2007
Page 3 and 4:
Impacting Foreign Policy as a Mid-L
Page 5 and 6:
Impacting Foreign Policy as a Mid-L
Page 7 and 8:
Chile..............................
Page 9 and 10:
contributions to U.S. foreign polic
Page 11 and 12:
etween personalities and more as a
Page 13 and 14:
duties but not jeopardize his caree
Page 15 and 16:
21 Morton H. Halperin and Patricia
Page 17 and 18:
younger sister. As Lister’s long-
Page 19 and 20:
as an ideological battle that the U
Page 21 and 22:
February 1955, Lister received a le
Page 23 and 24:
wanted to bring the entire Socialis
Page 25 and 26:
Schlesinger soon began working toge
Page 27 and 28:
espects Saragat more than vice-vers
Page 29 and 30:
Socialist Party that this office ha
Page 31 and 32:
First, his contacts with Italian So
Page 33 and 34:
eceptive to the Italian Socialists
Page 35 and 36:
64 George Lister, “Political Less
Page 37 and 38:
As he frequently did though, Lister
Page 39 and 40: Impact in the Bureau of Inter-Ameri
Page 41 and 42: leaders,” Lister wrote in 1971. 1
Page 43 and 44: Latin Americans to watch out for [t
Page 45 and 46: Lister’s facility with explaining
Page 47 and 48: away from the Communists, much as h
Page 49 and 50: Domingo as part of an inter-departm
Page 51 and 52: the crisis was “interesting and i
Page 53 and 54: War effort. Besides his propaganda
Page 55 and 56: Affairs to ask that the U.S. press
Page 57 and 58: win the ideological battle against
Page 59 and 60: 31 Ibid. 32 Memo, George Lister to
Page 61 and 62: 104 Ibid. 105 Ibid. 106 Ibid. 107 C
Page 63 and 64: ights suddenly became a major U.S.
Page 65 and 66: international human rights experts
Page 67 and 68: Rights, Carter reiterated that U.S.
Page 69 and 70: Reagan’s human rights policy was,
Page 71 and 72: When, as a result of the hearings,
Page 73 and 74: Human rights were rhetorically usef
Page 75 and 76: substantial,” Shlaudeman said.
Page 77 and 78: a reporter as “Mr. Human Rights.
Page 79 and 80: encourage improvement. As if to und
Page 81 and 82: Lister won plaudits from Patricia D
Page 83 and 84: ut the hearings were the starting p
Page 85 and 86: moment. The bureau had already been
Page 87 and 88: democratic opposition leaders. List
Page 89: greater attention to human rights v
Page 93 and 94: ability to update the State Departm
Page 95 and 96: a wide open society, essentially de
Page 97 and 98: wing regimes, you had to be against
Page 99 and 100: convinced that clear, reliable info
Page 101 and 102: he had reduced mistrust, Lister hel
Page 103 and 104: 49 Telephone interview by Gregory K
Page 105 and 106: 117 Ibid., p. 13. 118 Report, Georg
Page 107 and 108: Chapter 5. Human Rights Case Studie
Page 109 and 110: The Carter administration had campa
Page 111 and 112: the Sandinista government became in
Page 113 and 114: the Sandinistas, but he did not cha
Page 115 and 116: of the 1980s. Lister’s relationsh
Page 117 and 118: opinion of the text. Lister suggest
Page 119 and 120: Lister wrote to Assistant Secretary
Page 121 and 122: that the USG is pro-Pinochet, you a
Page 123 and 124: concern about Chile, the Reagan adm
Page 125 and 126: violations by the Pinochet governme
Page 127 and 128: luncheons with the Chilean Congress
Page 129 and 130: how Lister managed to have such a l
Page 131 and 132: 62 Letter, Kim Dae Jung to George L
Page 133 and 134: 129 Library of Congress, Authoritar
Page 135 and 136: movement—in particular, by insist
Page 137 and 138: Lister’s other political base was
Page 139 and 140: State Department as well as human r
Page 141 and 142:
open a political conversation with
Page 143 and 144:
Archival Documents Bibliography Abr
Page 145 and 146:
Lister, George. Memo to Mr. William
Page 147 and 148:
Lister, George. Memo to ARA Office
Page 149 and 150:
Lister, George. Memo to Elliott Abr
Page 151 and 152:
U.S. State Department. Career Histo
Page 153 and 154:
Library of Congress, Chile: The Con
Page 155 and 156:
Shlaudeman, Harry. Former Assistant
Page 157 and 158:
Memorial Service for George Lister.
show all

Copyright by Gregory Krauss 2007 - The University of Texas at Austin

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?