6.3 Suspended Ceiling Design Process - Bilkent University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

6.5.3 A Comparison between the Assembly Level DSM and the System Level DSM ........................................................................................ 148 7. CASE STUDY 2: ELEVATOR DESIGN .............................................. 153 7.1 Introduction .................................................................................... 153 7.2 Elevator System Architecture......................................................... 153 7.3 Elevator Design Process................................................................ 157 7.4 Analyzing Elevator Design Process with Parameter-based DSM .. 160 7.4.1 Research Setting ..................................................................... 160 7.4.2 The Scope and Limitations of the Model.................................. 161 7.4.3 Objectives of the Analysis........................................................ 162 7.4.4 The Procedure ......................................................................... 162 7.4.4.1 Data Collection................................................................... 163 7.4.4.2 The IDEF0 Models ............................................................. 164 7.4.4.3 The Information Database ................................................. 171 7.4.4.4 Production of the Matrix and Analyses............................... 171 7.5 Results and Discussion.................................................................. 175 8. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS.................................................. 179 8.1 Implications on the Design Process drawn from the Case Studies 179 8.2 Conclusions ................................................................................... 183 8.2.1 Contributions of the Study to the Subject Field ........................ 183 8.2.2 Challenges of the Proposed Method........................................ 185 8.2.2.1 Data Collection................................................................... 186 8.2.2.2 Data Representation .......................................................... 187 8.2.2.3 Enabling the Widespread Use of the Method..................... 188 x
8.3 Suggestions for Further Research ................................................. 189 REFERENCES ....................................................................................... 191 APPENDIX A .......................................................................................... 203 A.1 Classification of Building Parts in UNIFORMAT II ......................... 204 A.2 A Classification of Building Design Performance Factors.............. 205 APPENDIX B .......................................................................................... 207 B.1 Suspended Ceiling Design Parameter Definitions......................... 208 B.2 Elevator Design Parameter Definitions.......................................... 212 APPENDIX C.......................................................................................... 217 C.1 A Computer Program For Building the Design Structure Matrix .... 218 C.2 A Computer Program For Partitioning and Banding the Design Structure Matrix ................................................................................... 223 xi
Page 1 and 2: REPRESENTING INFORMATION FLOW IN BU
Page 3 and 4: ABSTRACT REPRESENTING INFORMATION F
Page 5 and 6: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Foremost, I would
Page 7 and 8: 2.2.3.4 Types of Information Models
Page 9: 5.3.3.1 Classification According to
Page 13 and 14: LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1: A Gener
Page 15 and 16: Figure 6.13: Initial Parameter-base
Page 17 and 18: in many building projects. This is
Page 19 and 20: process modeling method for buildin
Page 21 and 22: educational approaches, studies of
Page 23 and 24: 2. COLLABORATIVE DESIGN RESEARCH IN
Page 25 and 26: graphical interface to the Internet
Page 27 and 28: member are not agreed to by other m
Page 29 and 30: There is also considerable interest
Page 31 and 32: models are interdependent and they
Page 33 and 34: 5. Incomplete, uncertain, and untim
Page 35 and 36: 2.2.3.3 Advantages of the Informati
Page 37 and 38: process development effort is highl
Page 39 and 40: emerge at the early 1970s, moved aw
Page 41 and 42: the GDCPP. From the point of view o
Page 43 and 44: 3.2.1 Network Models Network models
Page 45 and 46: interpreted as resources. The idea
Page 47 and 48: (1999) applied these concepts to a
Page 49 and 50: Input Figure 3.5: A Generic IDEF0 D
Page 51 and 52: world with an independent existence
Page 53 and 54: Figure 3.7: A Generic UML Activity
Page 55 and 56: side indicating the scheduled start
Page 57 and 58: 4. DESIGN STRUCTURE MATRIX METHOD T
Page 59 and 60: need to be made. No optimal method
Page 61 and 62:
aim is to move the above diagonal m
Page 63 and 64:
is built, it can serve as a platfor
Page 65 and 66:
4.2.1 Component-based DSM System en
Page 67 and 68:
epresenting them as connections bet
Page 69 and 70:
Kusiak, 1996). While the DSM can be
Page 71 and 72:
since high-level processes sometime
Page 73 and 74:
(a) (b) Figure 4.6: A Parameter-bas
Page 75 and 76:
2. Importance ratings: A scale can
Page 77 and 78:
Besides adding extra attributes to
Page 79 and 80:
versions of the model a binary info
Page 81 and 82:
problem without the framework model
Page 83 and 84:
select a task for decomposition and
Page 85 and 86:
developed such as interaction chart
Page 87 and 88:
contracts. In current practice for
Page 89 and 90:
completed. The former is called une
Page 91 and 92:
Browning, 1998) found that addition
Page 93 and 94:
A parameter-based DSM may provide i
Page 95 and 96:
5.2.2 Process Integration The situa
Page 97 and 98:
Figure 5.1: Two Coupled Activities
Page 99 and 100:
Although representing parameter val
Page 101 and 102:
5.3.1 Assumptions and Scope of the
Page 103 and 104:
In order to develop the IFC specifi
Page 105 and 106:
object must support a variety of AE
Page 107 and 108:
Figure 5.6: Four different Views of
Page 109 and 110:
countries which have a classificati
Page 111 and 112:
process integration. Therefore, in
Page 113 and 114:
technical terms. Furthermore, some
Page 115 and 116:
the DSM and to denote the performan
Page 117 and 118:
ased DSM. Since such DSMs are low-l
Page 119 and 120:
modeling of information management
Page 121 and 122:
Architect Design Engineers User Int
Page 123 and 124:
Figure 5.12: A Workflow Proposal fo
Page 125 and 126:
study, which analyzes elevator desi
Page 127 and 128:
parameters were defined according t
Page 129 and 130:
plenum, hangers, and wall angles. T
Page 131 and 132:
suspension system. Fittings support
Page 133 and 134:
constraints to the integrated syste
Page 135 and 136:
leaded by a chief engineer. Design
Page 137 and 138:
P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 180 90 180
Page 139 and 140:
Infrastructure design: 2 people At
Page 141 and 142:
6.4.4.1 The Design Configuration Th
Page 143 and 144:
parameter relationships. However, o
Page 145 and 146:
Study Feasibility A1 Select Suspend
Page 147 and 148:
Figure 6.7: An IDEF0 Model of Suspe
Page 149 and 150:
Figure 6.9: An IDEF0 Model of Suspe
Page 151 and 152:
Figure 6.10: An Example System Desc
Page 153 and 154:
Performance Requirements System Lev
Page 155 and 156:
Performance Requirements System Lev
Page 157 and 158:
Thermal Performance Lighting Perfor
Page 159 and 160:
6.5 Results and Discussion 6.5.1 Ob
Page 161 and 162:
plenum. Several different schemes m
Page 163 and 164:
6.5.3 A Comparison between the Asse
Page 165 and 166:
performance requirements drive desi
Page 167 and 168:
finding supports the comments made
Page 169 and 170:
applied by an electric driving mach
Page 171 and 172:
surfaces. One rail is installed on
Page 173 and 174:
Elevator design process begins with
Page 175 and 176:
Having decided the car, hoistway, a
Page 177 and 178:
4. It is assumed that there is no n
Page 179 and 180:
2. Occasionally, different design p
Page 181 and 182:
Figure 7.2: The Context Diagram of
Page 183 and 184:
Figure 7.4: An IDEF0 Model of Eleva
Page 185 and 186:
Figure 7.6: An IDEF0 Model of Detai
Page 187 and 188:
System Level Parameters Analyze Ele
Page 189 and 190:
Building Type Building Style Tenanc
Page 191 and 192:
time, round trip time, and number o
Page 193 and 194:
there are large cycles. This sugges
Page 195 and 196:
such formulas than suspended ceilin
Page 197 and 198:
Furthermore, it was observed in the
Page 199 and 200:
3. In order to deal with large DSMs
Page 201 and 202:
observed in the case studies includ
Page 203 and 204:
while an aircraft or ship may have
Page 205 and 206:
developers can use the method to in
Page 207 and 208:
Baldwin, A. N., Austin, S., Hassan,
Page 209 and 210:
Denker, S., Steward, D. and Brownin
Page 211 and 212:
Karhu, V. (2001). A Model based App
Page 213 and 214:
Problematics. (2003). Problematics
Page 215 and 216:
Suh, N. P. (1998). Axiomatic Design
Page 217 and 218:
January 20, 2003, from http://www.c
Page 219 and 220:
A.1 Classification of Building Part
Page 221 and 222:
• Time (aesthetic service life)
Page 223 and 224:
B.1 Suspended Ceiling Design Parame
Page 225 and 226:
Panel Acoustics NRC: Noise Reductio
Page 227 and 228:
B.2 Elevator Design Parameter Defin
Page 229 and 230:
Floor Area: The areas of the floors
Page 231 and 232:
UpPeak Interval: The interval betwe
Page 233 and 234:
C.1 A Computer Program For Building
Page 235 and 236:
Figure 3. Unpartitioned Matrix The
Page 237 and 238:
'fill in matrix titles For counter
Page 239 and 240:
4. Open the sheet “partitioned DS
Page 241 and 242:
End With For i = 1 To n Cells(i + 2
Page 243 and 244:
End If Next j total_row(i) = k 'ass
show all

6.3 Suspended Ceiling Design Process - Bilkent University

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?