30.01.2013 Views

6.3 Suspended Ceiling Design Process - Bilkent University

6.3 Suspended Ceiling Design Process - Bilkent University

6.3 Suspended Ceiling Design Process - Bilkent University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7. Construct and analyze the matrix and comment on the design<br />

process.<br />

8. Evaluate the results with the participants.<br />

7.4.4.1 Data Collection<br />

The data was collected through inspection of design documents and<br />

interviews with designers. Since all of the participants except the<br />

elevator design engineer from OTIS were familiar with the DSM<br />

method, the early steps of the data collection process (explanation of<br />

the aim and the procedure of the study and of how DSMs work) were<br />

relatively short. The early interviews were open-ended type and<br />

recorded. Besides these interviews, some design documents such as<br />

manufacturers’ information, drawings, and design guides have been<br />

examined. A draft version of elevator design process model was<br />

produced according to the collected data. In the later phases of the data<br />

collection process, the matrix was revised according to the comments<br />

from the participants. In addition to the observations on the data<br />

collection process discussed in the previous case study, the following<br />

points were identified in this study:<br />

1. The design participants might have different perspectives on the<br />

issues due to their different disciplinary backgrounds. In this case,<br />

the interviewer had to act as a mediator. Thus, this study revealed<br />

that in data collection for DSM analyses the interviewer should<br />

posses the knowledge of the system to some degree and be able to<br />

discuss different aspects of the process.<br />

163

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!