6.3 Suspended Ceiling Design Process - Bilkent University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Hew, K. P., Fisher, N., & Awbi, H. B. (2001). Towards an Integrated Set of Design Tools based on a Common Data Format for Building and Services Design. Automation in Construction, 10, 459-476. Hirschi, N. W., & Frey, D. D. (2002). Cognition and Complexity: An Experiment on the Effect of Coupling in Parameter Design. Research in Engineering Design, 13, 123-131. Hong, N. K., & Hong, S. (2001). Application of Entity-based Approach for Unified Representation of Design Alternatives for Structural Design. Advances in Engineering Software, 32, 599-610. Howell, G. A. (1999). What is Lean Construction? Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 26-28 July 1999, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. 1-10. Retrieved January 9, 2001, from http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/IGLC- 7/PDF/Howell.pdf Hubka, V. (1982). Principles of Engineering Design. Guildford, Surrey: Butterworth Scientific Press. Huovila, P., & Seren, K. J. (1998). Customer-oriented Design Methods for Construction Projects. Journal of Engineering Design, 9 (3), 225-238. International Alliance for Interoperability (IAI), the North America Chapter. (2003). Projects Web Page. Retrieved June 9, 2003, from http://www.iaina.org/technical/projects.php International Alliance for Interoperability (IAI), the UK Chapter. (1999). Elevator Design Model. Retrieved February 18, 2003, from http://www.iai.org.uk/design_integration/technical_documentation/R3_bs_e levators.pdf Jackson, B. (1997). The Development of TOTAL Studio: A Comprehensive Computer-Mediated Studio Environment for Architecture and Engineering. Retrieved December 16, 1999, from http://wwwec.njit.edu/ec_info/image1/text_files/jax/papers/total_97.html Jones, J. C. (1970). Design Methods: Seeds of Human Futures. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Kalay, Y. E., Khemlani, L., & Choi, J. W. (1998). An Integrated Model to Support Distributed Collaborative Design of Buildings. Automation in Construction, 7, 177-188. Karhu, V. (2000). Proposed New Method for Construction Process Modelling. International Journal of Computer Integrated Design and Construction, 2 (3), 166-182. 195
Karhu, V. (2001). A Model based Approach for Construction Process Modelling. Retrieved May 6, 2003, from www.lib.kth.se/Sammanfattningar/karhu011109.pdf Karstila, K. (2000). About Process Modelling: Methods and Tools for Construction Process Support. Retrieved June 9, 2002, from http://www.arcada.fi/personal/heffe/04%20hut%20it%20tfif%20merit/itecon _course/TKK_Rak-63_200_Lecture2_ProcessModelling_KKa_200-02- 04.pdf [sic] Krishnan, W. (1993). Design Process Improvement: Sequencing and Overlapping Activities in Product Development. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved February 6, 2002, from http://theses.mit.edu Kvan, T. (2000). “Collaborative Design: What is it?” Automation in Construction, 9, 409-415. Larson, N., & Kusiak, A. (1996). Managing Design Processes: A Risk Assessment Approach. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 26 (1), 749-759. Lean Aerospace Initiative (LAI). (2002). Lean Aerospace Initiative Web Site. Retrieved January 10, 2002, from http://lean.mit.edu Lean Construction Institute (LCI). (2002). Lean Construction Institute Web Site. Retrieved January 10, 2002, from http://www.leanconstruction.org Lee, E., Woo, S., & Sasada, T. (2001). The Evaluation System for Design Alternatives in Collaborative Design. Automation in Construction, 10, 295- 301. Liebich, T., & Wix, J. (2003). Highlights of the Development Process of Industry Foundation Classes. Retrieved January 14, 2003, from http://www.iaina.org/technical/highlights_ifc.pdf Lockledge, J. C., & Salustri, F. A. (2001). Design Communication Using a Variation of the Design Structure Matrix. International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 01 Glasgow, August 21-23. Retrieved March 16, 2003, from http://www.dig.bris.ac.uk/iced/iced01/webpages/HTML/204- Lockledge.html Lottaz, C. (2000). Increasing Understanding during Collaboration through Advanced Representations. Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon). Retrieved March 1, 2000, from http://www.itcon.org/2000/1/paper.htm 196
Page 1 and 2:
REPRESENTING INFORMATION FLOW IN BU
Page 3 and 4:
ABSTRACT REPRESENTING INFORMATION F
Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Foremost, I would
Page 7 and 8:
2.2.3.4 Types of Information Models
Page 9 and 10:
5.3.3.1 Classification According to
Page 11 and 12:
8.3 Suggestions for Further Researc
Page 13 and 14:
LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1: A Gener
Page 15 and 16:
Figure 6.13: Initial Parameter-base
Page 17 and 18:
in many building projects. This is
Page 19 and 20:
process modeling method for buildin
Page 21 and 22:
educational approaches, studies of
Page 23 and 24:
2. COLLABORATIVE DESIGN RESEARCH IN
Page 25 and 26:
graphical interface to the Internet
Page 27 and 28:
member are not agreed to by other m
Page 29 and 30:
There is also considerable interest
Page 31 and 32:
models are interdependent and they
Page 33 and 34:
5. Incomplete, uncertain, and untim
Page 35 and 36:
2.2.3.3 Advantages of the Informati
Page 37 and 38:
process development effort is highl
Page 39 and 40:
emerge at the early 1970s, moved aw
Page 41 and 42:
the GDCPP. From the point of view o
Page 43 and 44:
3.2.1 Network Models Network models
Page 45 and 46:
interpreted as resources. The idea
Page 47 and 48:
(1999) applied these concepts to a
Page 49 and 50:
Input Figure 3.5: A Generic IDEF0 D
Page 51 and 52:
world with an independent existence
Page 53 and 54:
Figure 3.7: A Generic UML Activity
Page 55 and 56:
side indicating the scheduled start
Page 57 and 58:
4. DESIGN STRUCTURE MATRIX METHOD T
Page 59 and 60:
need to be made. No optimal method
Page 61 and 62:
aim is to move the above diagonal m
Page 63 and 64:
is built, it can serve as a platfor
Page 65 and 66:
4.2.1 Component-based DSM System en
Page 67 and 68:
epresenting them as connections bet
Page 69 and 70:
Kusiak, 1996). While the DSM can be
Page 71 and 72:
since high-level processes sometime
Page 73 and 74:
(a) (b) Figure 4.6: A Parameter-bas
Page 75 and 76:
2. Importance ratings: A scale can
Page 77 and 78:
Besides adding extra attributes to
Page 79 and 80:
versions of the model a binary info
Page 81 and 82:
problem without the framework model
Page 83 and 84:
select a task for decomposition and
Page 85 and 86:
developed such as interaction chart
Page 87 and 88:
contracts. In current practice for
Page 89 and 90:
completed. The former is called une
Page 91 and 92:
Browning, 1998) found that addition
Page 93 and 94:
A parameter-based DSM may provide i
Page 95 and 96:
5.2.2 Process Integration The situa
Page 97 and 98:
Figure 5.1: Two Coupled Activities
Page 99 and 100:
Although representing parameter val
Page 101 and 102:
5.3.1 Assumptions and Scope of the
Page 103 and 104:
In order to develop the IFC specifi
Page 105 and 106:
object must support a variety of AE
Page 107 and 108:
Figure 5.6: Four different Views of
Page 109 and 110:
countries which have a classificati
Page 111 and 112:
process integration. Therefore, in
Page 113 and 114:
technical terms. Furthermore, some
Page 115 and 116:
the DSM and to denote the performan
Page 117 and 118:
ased DSM. Since such DSMs are low-l
Page 119 and 120:
modeling of information management
Page 121 and 122:
Architect Design Engineers User Int
Page 123 and 124:
Figure 5.12: A Workflow Proposal fo
Page 125 and 126:
study, which analyzes elevator desi
Page 127 and 128:
parameters were defined according t
Page 129 and 130:
plenum, hangers, and wall angles. T
Page 131 and 132:
suspension system. Fittings support
Page 133 and 134:
constraints to the integrated syste
Page 135 and 136:
leaded by a chief engineer. Design
Page 137 and 138:
P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 180 90 180
Page 139 and 140:
Infrastructure design: 2 people At
Page 141 and 142:
6.4.4.1 The Design Configuration Th
Page 143 and 144:
parameter relationships. However, o
Page 145 and 146:
Study Feasibility A1 Select Suspend
Page 147 and 148:
Figure 6.7: An IDEF0 Model of Suspe
Page 149 and 150:
Figure 6.9: An IDEF0 Model of Suspe
Page 151 and 152:
Figure 6.10: An Example System Desc
Page 153 and 154:
Performance Requirements System Lev
Page 155 and 156:
Performance Requirements System Lev
Page 157 and 158:
Thermal Performance Lighting Perfor
Page 159 and 160: 6.5 Results and Discussion 6.5.1 Ob
Page 161 and 162: plenum. Several different schemes m
Page 163 and 164: 6.5.3 A Comparison between the Asse
Page 165 and 166: performance requirements drive desi
Page 167 and 168: finding supports the comments made
Page 169 and 170: applied by an electric driving mach
Page 171 and 172: surfaces. One rail is installed on
Page 173 and 174: Elevator design process begins with
Page 175 and 176: Having decided the car, hoistway, a
Page 177 and 178: 4. It is assumed that there is no n
Page 179 and 180: 2. Occasionally, different design p
Page 181 and 182: Figure 7.2: The Context Diagram of
Page 183 and 184: Figure 7.4: An IDEF0 Model of Eleva
Page 185 and 186: Figure 7.6: An IDEF0 Model of Detai
Page 187 and 188: System Level Parameters Analyze Ele
Page 189 and 190: Building Type Building Style Tenanc
Page 191 and 192: time, round trip time, and number o
Page 193 and 194: there are large cycles. This sugges
Page 195 and 196: such formulas than suspended ceilin
Page 197 and 198: Furthermore, it was observed in the
Page 199 and 200: 3. In order to deal with large DSMs
Page 201 and 202: observed in the case studies includ
Page 203 and 204: while an aircraft or ship may have
Page 205 and 206: developers can use the method to in
Page 207 and 208: Baldwin, A. N., Austin, S., Hassan,
Page 209: Denker, S., Steward, D. and Brownin
Page 213 and 214: Problematics. (2003). Problematics
Page 215 and 216: Suh, N. P. (1998). Axiomatic Design
Page 217 and 218: January 20, 2003, from http://www.c
Page 219 and 220: A.1 Classification of Building Part
Page 221 and 222: • Time (aesthetic service life)
Page 223 and 224: B.1 Suspended Ceiling Design Parame
Page 225 and 226: Panel Acoustics NRC: Noise Reductio
Page 227 and 228: B.2 Elevator Design Parameter Defin
Page 229 and 230: Floor Area: The areas of the floors
Page 231 and 232: UpPeak Interval: The interval betwe
Page 233 and 234: C.1 A Computer Program For Building
Page 235 and 236: Figure 3. Unpartitioned Matrix The
Page 237 and 238: 'fill in matrix titles For counter
Page 239 and 240: 4. Open the sheet “partitioned DS
Page 241 and 242: End With For i = 1 To n Cells(i + 2
Page 243 and 244: End If Next j total_row(i) = k 'ass
show all

6.3 Suspended Ceiling Design Process - Bilkent University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?