09.02.2013 Views

WATER JET CONFERENCE - Waterjet Technology Association

WATER JET CONFERENCE - Waterjet Technology Association

WATER JET CONFERENCE - Waterjet Technology Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Materials Tested<br />

Four different soils with a substantial variation in engineering properties and<br />

behavior were subjected to the jet cutting experiments. The grain size distributions of<br />

these soils are shown in Figure 1.<br />

Soil 1 is a readily available clean sand (Ottawa sand); soil 2 is a mixture by weight<br />

of 85% locally available sand (torpedo sand) and 15% natural silty soil (Vicksburg loess);<br />

soil 3 is a naturally occurring silty soil (Vicksburg loess); and soil 4 is a mixture by weight<br />

of 50% naturaliv occurring clayey soil (Chicaqo area clay) and 50% commercially<br />

available kaolinite. According to the Unified Soil Classification System these materials<br />

are classified as SP, SW, ML, and CL, respectively.<br />

Sample Preparation and Testing Procedures<br />

The following factors were taken into consideration for the selection of an<br />

adequate sample container:<br />

(a) the container should be impervious as soil samples in a saturated and partially<br />

saturated state would be tested;<br />

(a) the container should be large enough to avoid any adverse interference from the<br />

container walls while the sample was being exposed to the jet;<br />

(a) the total weight of container and sample should be small enough to allow its<br />

convenient handlinq and transportation from an area of preparation to the location of<br />

the water jet system; and<br />

(a) the container should be able to be placed upon the lathe which was utilized to traverse<br />

the samples.<br />

Therefore, various lengths of six inch inside diameter PVC (plastic) pipe were chosen as<br />

appropriate sample containers This sample container also lended itself very nicely to the<br />

compaction of samples with a manually operated drop hammer.<br />

To prepare a sample, dry pulverized soil was weighed and mixed with a<br />

predetermined amount of water to attain the desired degree of saturation. Frequent checks<br />

of moisture content were made to insure adequate control. Then a specific weight of the<br />

moist soil was placed in the container and was compacted (by vibration or using a drop<br />

hammer) to a predetermined layer thickness in order to attain the desired dry density.<br />

Enough layers were thus compacted to obtain the desired length of sample. Deviations<br />

from this procedure were necessary onlv when preparing samples of Soil 1. In this case, a<br />

sample of the desired length and dry density was first formed and was then saturated by<br />

allowing water to flow up through the sample by means of a valve at the base of the<br />

container; to obtain a partially saturated sample, some of the water was allowed to drain<br />

through the bottom of the container.<br />

Soils 1 and 2 were placed in the containers in two inch lifts and between each lift<br />

was placed a four inch square paper marker which was numbered. The thickness of each<br />

layer was checked in order to insure adequate density control. The paper markers were<br />

used with these cohesionless soils since the holes or slots excavated by the water jet had a<br />

tendency to collapse. At the end of each test the depth of jet penetration could be<br />

established to within one inch by gradually emptying the container and inspecting the<br />

markers for signs of penetration by the jet. The diameter of the hole excavated was<br />

estimated as the average of the diameter of the holes present on the markers penetrated by<br />

123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!