13.02.2013 Views

Advanced Building Simulation

Advanced Building Simulation

Advanced Building Simulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

166 Mahdavi<br />

practice, however, controllers for various systems and components are often interdependent.<br />

A controller may need the information from another controller in order to<br />

devise and execute control decisions. For example, the building lighting system may<br />

need information on the building’s thermal status (e.g. heating versus cooling mode)<br />

in order to identify the most desirable combination of natural and electrical lighting<br />

options. Moreover, two different controllers may affect the same control parameter<br />

of the same impact zone. For example, the operation of the window and the operation<br />

of the heating system can both affect the temperature in a room. In such cases,<br />

controllers of individual systems cannot identify the preferable course of action independently.<br />

Instead, they must rely on a higher-level controller instance (a “metacontroller”,<br />

(MC) as it were), which can process information from both systems<br />

toward a properly integrated control response.<br />

We conclude that the multitude of controllers in a complex building controls<br />

scheme must be coupled appropriately to facilitate an efficient and user-responsive<br />

building operation regime. Thus, control system features are required to integrate and<br />

coordinate the operation of multiple devices and their controllers. Toward this end,<br />

control functionalities must be distributed among multiple higher-level controllers or<br />

MCs in a structured and distributed fashion. The nodes in the network of DCs and<br />

MCs represent points of information processing and decision-making.<br />

In general, “first-order” MCs are required: (i) to coordinate the operation of<br />

identical, separately controllable devices and (ii) to enable cooperation between different<br />

devices in the same environmental service domain. A simple example of the<br />

first case is shown in Figure 7.5 (left), where an MC is needed to coordinate the operation<br />

of two electric lights to achieve interior illuminance goals in a single control<br />

zone. In the second case (see Figure 7.5, right), movable blinds and electric lights are<br />

coordinated to integrate daylighting with electric lighting.<br />

In actual building control scenarios, one encounters many different combinations of<br />

the cases discussed here. Thus, the manner in which the control system functionality<br />

DC<br />

Light 1<br />

MC<br />

Lights<br />

DC<br />

Light 2<br />

Light 1 Light 2<br />

Sensor<br />

DC<br />

Light<br />

MC<br />

Visual<br />

DC<br />

Blinds<br />

Light Blinds<br />

Sensor<br />

Figure 7.5 Left: MC for individually controllable identical devices; Right: MC for different devices<br />

addressing the same control parameter.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!