13.02.2013 Views

Advanced Building Simulation

Advanced Building Simulation

Advanced Building Simulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and photometric properties, as well as the outdoor measurements at time interval t i<br />

were used as model input). Based on the simulation results and objective functions, it<br />

was possible to determine for each time-step the louver position that was considered<br />

most likely to maximize the light distribution uniformity or to minimize the deviation<br />

of average illuminance from the target value.<br />

Step 4. Device controller instructed the control device (louver) to assume the position<br />

identified in step 3 as most desirable.<br />

To evaluate the performance of the simulation-based control approach in this particular<br />

case, we measured during the test period at each time-step the resulting illuminance<br />

levels sequentially for all four louver positions and for all selected time<br />

intervals. To numerically evaluate the performance of this simulation-based control<br />

approach via a “control quality index”, we ranked the resulting (measured) average<br />

illuminance and the uniformity according to the degree to which they fulfilled the<br />

objective functions. We assigned 100 points to the instances when the model-based<br />

recommendation matched the position empirically found to be the best. In those cases<br />

where the recommendation was furthest from the optimal position, control quality<br />

index was assumed to be zero. Intermediate cases were evaluated based on interpolation.<br />

Control quality index was found to be 74 for illuminance and 99 for uniformity.<br />

The better performance in the case of the uniformity indicator is due to the<br />

“relative” nature of this indicator, which, in contrast to the illuminance, is less<br />

affected by the absolute errors in the predictions of the simulation model.<br />

7.4.5 Challenges<br />

Self-organizing models for sentient buildings 175<br />

7.4.5.1 Introduction<br />

In previous sections we described the simulation-based strategy toward building systems<br />

control and how this approach, supported by a self-organizing building model,<br />

could facilitate the operation of a sentient building. The practical realization of these<br />

methods and concepts, however, requires efficient solutions for various critical implementation<br />

issues. The appendices of the chapter include case studies involving<br />

demonstrative implementation efforts that illustrate some of these problems and their<br />

potential solutions.<br />

There are two basic problems of the proposed approach, which we briefly mention<br />

but will not pursue in detail, as they are not specific to simulation-based control<br />

methodology but represent basic problems related to simulation methods and<br />

technologies in general:<br />

1 First, the reliability of simulation algorithms and tools is always subject to<br />

validation, and this has been shown to be a difficult problem in the building performance<br />

simulation domain. In the context of sentient building implementations,<br />

there is an interesting possibility to improve on the predictive capability of<br />

the simulation applications by “on-line” calibration of simulation results. This<br />

can be done by continuous real-time monitoring of the performance indicator<br />

values (using a limited number of strategically located sensors) and comparing<br />

those with corresponding simulation results. Using the results of this comparison,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!