Tecnociencia_Deporte_Sociedad_Vol3

Tecnociencia, Deporte y Sociedad: ¿victorias de laboratorio? | 91
REFERENCIAS
• Andreff, W. (2008) Globalization of the Sports Economy.
Rivista di Diritto ed Economia dello Sport, 4
(3): 13-32.
• Amer Sports web page http://www.amersports.com/
about-us/r-d
• Bergeron, S., Lallich, S., Bas, C.L., 1998. Location of
innovating activities, industrial structure and techno-industrial
clusters in the French economy,
1985–1990: evidence from US patenting, Research
Policy 26, 733–751.
• Bhidé, A.V. (2000) Origen y evolución de nuevas empresas.
México: Oxford University Press. 528 págs.
• Breschi, S., Malerba, F. & Orsenigo, L. (2000) Technological
Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of
Innovation, Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society,
vol. 110(463), pages 388-410, April.
• Buesa, M. y Molero, J. (1998). Economía Industrial de
España. Madrid: Civitas.
• Businessweek web page (2014) http://investing.
businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=1890054;
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.
asp?privcapId=73020347; http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.
asp?privcapId=25005369
• Brynjolfsson, E. y Hitt, L. (1996). Paradox lost?
Firm-level evidence on the returns to information
systems spending, Management Science, vol. 42,
4, pp. 541-558.
• Chandler, A.D. (1990). Scale and Scope: The Dynamics
of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge: Belknap Press
• Chen M-N & Chang Y-Ch (2011) Service Regime and
Sectoral Patterns of Innovation in Services: a Reinvestigation
using Miozzo & Soete Taxonomy. DRUID
2011. Copenhagen Business School, Denmark, June
15-17.
• Crépon, B. (1993). Taille des firmes et activité innovative.
Une analyse sur donées individuelles. Insse
Méthodes, 37-38, novembre.
• Dewan, S. y Min, C. (1997). “The substitution of information
technology for other factors of production:
A firm level analysis”, Management Science, 43 (12):
1660-75.
• EC (2013). Research and Innovation performance in
EU Member States and Associated countries –Innovation
Union progress at country level. COM-
MISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT State of
the Innovation Union 2012 - Accelerating change
{COM(2013) 149 final}.
• Goss, E. (2001). The Internet´s contribution to U.S.
productivity growth, Business Economics, 36 (4):
32-42.
• Gover, J.E., 1993. Strengthening the competitiveness
of US microelectronics. IEEE Transactions on Engineering
Management EM-40 (1), 3–13.
• Gumbau, M. (1994). Los determinantes de la innovación:
el papel del tamaño de la empresa. Información
Comercial Española, 726, febrero.
• Head, N.V. (2014) Annual Report 2013. En https://
www.head.com/corporate/investors/annual_reports.php
recuperado el 26 de septiembre de 2014.
• Heinemann, K. (2001) Los valores del deporte. Una
perspectiva sociológica. Apunts, (64): 17-25.
• Khorshidi A. (2010). Investigating the Relation of
Sport and Economy, Majlis’s Research Center.
• Li, J. (2012). Erawatch Country Reports 2012: China.
EraWatch Reports. Directorate General for Research
and Innovation and Joint Research Centre - Institute
for Prospective Technological Studies (JRC-IPTS).
En http://erawatch.jrc.ec.europa.eu recuperado el
26 de septiembre de 2014.
• Liang, Z. (2011).The Research of Identification and
Determination for Sports Industry Cluster. 978-1-
4244-6581-1/11/$26.00-IEEE
• Malerba, F. & Orsenigo, L. (1996) Schumpeterian patters
of innovation are technology specific. Research
Policy, 25 (3): 451-78.
• Marsili, O. & Verspagen, B. (2001) Technological Regimes
and Innovation: Looking for Regularities
in Dutch Manufacturing. ECIS. Working Paper. En
http://rtd-sectors.eu/files/assets/WP1/THEORY%20
Taxonomies/Marsili%202001.pdf accesado el 28 de
septiembre de 2014.
• McCraw, T.K. (1997). American Capitalism. En McCraw,
T.K. (ed.) Creating Modern Capitalism. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
• Navarro, M. (2003) Análisis y Política de Cluster: Teoría