Številka 53 - Odvetniška Zbornica Slovenije

Odvetnik 53 / oktober 2011 Avtorski sinopsis
59
dr. Primož Gorkič
Učinkovita obramba v kazenskem
postopku ali »v korist« obdolženca
Razvoj slovenskega kazenskega postopka je pripeljal do novih
ravnotežij med procesnimi udeleženci. To še posebej velja za
obrambo in njena procesna jamstva. Ustavno sodišče RS v svojih
odločbah pošilja jasno sporočilo obdolžencem in njihovim
zagovornikom: obstruktivna ali zavlačevalna dejanja je treba
šteti za nesprejemljivo zlorabo procesnih pravic. V takem okviru
je smiseln pristop k obrambi premišljeno maksimiranje obdolženčeve
udeležbe v kazenskem postopku. Namen je zmanjšati
asimetrijo informacij, ki je v kazenskem postopku posebej
opazna v razmerju med obdolžencem in organi kazenskega postopka,
zlasti policijo in državnim tožilcem.
dr. Primož Gorkič
Effective defence in criminal
procedure: for the benefit of the
defendant
Developments in Slovenian criminal procedure have led to a
newly established equilibrium in criminal procedure. This is
particularly evident with regard to the rights of defence. In its
case-law, the Constitutional Court of Slovenia has been sending
a clear message to defendants and their defence lawyers:
obstructive or delaying defence tactics will be labelled as abuse
of defence rights and will not be tolerated. In such a context, the
reasonable approach to effective defence is to carefully maximise
defendant's participation in criminal procedure in order to reduce
the information gap that is in place between competent
bodies of criminal procedure (most notably, the police and the
public prosecutor) and the defendant.
Jože Ilc
Upravljanje solastnine
Stvarnopravni zakonik predpisuje potrebno večino solastnikov,
da odločajo o poslih redne in izredne uprave. Odprto ostane
vprašanje redne in izredne uprave, zlasti pa razmejitve med
obema pojmoma. Upravljanje solastnine je odgovor na potrebe
ohranjanja solastnega premoženja. Zato sta koristni tudi smiselna
razlaga in primerjava predpisov, ki se dotikajo tega področja,
na primer Stanovanjskega zakona, Zakona o graditvi objektov in
Obligacijskega zakonika. Solastnina je lahko podlaga in izvir številnih
sporov med solastniki. Treba je podrobneje določiti obseg
redne uprave in izredne uprave, pa tudi ponovno predpisati
potrebno večino za odločanje. Še bolj nujno je, da se Zakon o
nepravdnem postopku pri vprašanjih solastninskih razmerij natančno
procesno uredi in stremi predvsem k hitrim odločitvam.
Dolgotrajni postopki imajo samo negativni učinek.
Jože Ilc
Joint property management
Law of Property Code defines the necessary majority which
should be met by co-owners to perform ordinary and extraordinary
transactions. This provision provides a way to achieve the
majority. Question of the meaning of ordinary and extraordinary
transactions remains, especially distinction between both
terms. Joint property management provides a way of maintaining
the joint property. For this reason it is useful to interpret and
compere the regulations which concern this area of law, as are
Housing Act, Construction Act and Code of Obligations, in a
logical manner. Joint property can be a source of numerous disputes
among co-owners. It is necessary to define exact meaning
of ordinary and extraordinary transactions as well as new majority
of decision adoption. More important, the Non-litigious Civil
Procedure Act should be amended and it should aim to a fast
decision-making. Long procedures have negative effect.
mag. Rudi Vouk
Člen 7 ADP je revidiran – kaj zdaj?
Avstrija je sprejela spremembe Zakona o narodnih skupinah
na ustavni ravni, spremembe se tičejo dvojezične topografije in
mož nosti uporabljanja slovenščine kot uradnega jezika na avstrijskem
Koroškem. Kljub dejstvu, da se je število dvojezičnih
krajevnih napisov povečalo, ureditev ne ustreza razsodbam avstrijskega
ustavnega sodišča in tudi ne 7. členu Avstrijske državne
pogodbe (ADP). Na področju uradnega jezika pomeni celo
poslabšanje v primerjavi s prejšnjim stanjem. Ureditev nima notranje
logike, v resnici gre za sprejemanje izvršnih določil na
ustavni ravni in s tem za zlorabo ustavne zakonodaje. Slovenija
bi ob tej priložnosti morala formalno urediti nasledstvo v ADP,
vendar je to možnost dokončno zamudila. Avstrija je popustljive
zastopniške organizacije koroških Slovencev nagradila, tiste,
ki so hotele vztrajati na pozicijah pravne države, pa kaznovala.
mag. Rudi Vouk
Article 7 of the Austrian
Independence Treaty is revised – What
now?
Austria has amended the Law on National Communities on a
constitutional level. The amendments concern bilingual topography
and right to use Slovenian language as an official language
in Austrian Carinthia. Although the number of bilingual local
sings has increased, the regulation is not in accordance with judgements
of Austrian Constitutional Court neither with the Article
7 of the Austrian Independence Treaty. Concerning the official
language the new regulation is less favourable than previous
regulation. The new regulation lacks inner consistency. In reality
we witness adoption of executive decisions on a constitutional
level, and this is misuse of constitutional legislation. On
this occasion Slovenia should have formally sorted out the succession
of Austrian Independence Treaty, but it has missed this
opportunity, finally. Austria has rewarded the indulgent representative
organizations of Slovenians of Carinthia, and punished
those who tried to defend the state of law.