Welfare Reform Team Evaluation of European Social Fund pilot project 2014-2015
welfare_reform_european_social_fund_project_evaluation_report
welfare_reform_european_social_fund_project_evaluation_report
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
General comments on the above feedback<br />
Clearly the feedback is very positive in relation to the event location, timing and<br />
convenience. That level <strong>of</strong> agreement reduces slightly in relation to the appropriateness <strong>of</strong><br />
the advice/information/help provided but reduces significantly when it comes to the<br />
question did the event meet attendees individual needs.<br />
Overall in terms <strong>of</strong> execution and attendance the event can be seen as a success, but given<br />
the relatively modest levels <strong>of</strong> satisfaction in terms <strong>of</strong> meeting individual need there is<br />
clearly room for improvement. Obviously the main aim <strong>of</strong> the event was to help people into<br />
employment and if their needs in that respect aren’t being met then this aspect needs to be<br />
discussed in some depth before the next event.<br />
Listed at appendix three are the comments written by attendees on their feedback sheets<br />
which may throw some light on why needs weren’t met in some cases. A rough thematic<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> those comments coupled with verbal feedback on the day would suggest the<br />
main failings were;<br />
• Employers didn’t engage enough<br />
• There were very few basic administration roles on <strong>of</strong>fer<br />
• A high proportion <strong>of</strong> the jobs required some degree <strong>of</strong> specific qualification or recent<br />
relevant experience.<br />
• Lack <strong>of</strong> obvious or previously provided information about jobs/employers<br />
• Long queues and lack <strong>of</strong> seating may have resulted in people not being overly<br />
positive when they then met employers<br />
The job/employer related aspects above show a mismatch between what employers had on<br />
<strong>of</strong>fer and how they presented it, and the skills, experience and confidence <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> the<br />
clients who attended.<br />
This mismatch is however a gap that could be bridged over time if more extended<br />
introductions were made to employers with, and on behalf <strong>of</strong> clients and if employers were<br />
helped to be more flexible in terms <strong>of</strong> their recruitment criteria. This mismatch <strong>of</strong> people<br />
and jobs was also illustrated by some <strong>of</strong> the employers both verbally and on their feedback<br />
forms.<br />
Verbal feedback on the day, having spoken to other staff in attendance, would also suggest<br />
that rather than coaching attendees at workshops before the event it may in future be<br />
worth coaching employers as to how to effectively engage with the client group.<br />
Certain employers didn’t create an air <strong>of</strong> approachability and with many <strong>of</strong> our client group<br />
lacking confidence particularly in group situations barriers <strong>of</strong> this nature have to be broken<br />
down. It was also felt that a more relaxed approach from the employers, i.e. dressing less<br />
formally and perhaps standing in front <strong>of</strong> their tables not behind, might have helped put<br />
3