06.06.2016 Views

Welfare Reform Team Evaluation of European Social Fund pilot project 2014-2015

welfare_reform_european_social_fund_project_evaluation_report

welfare_reform_european_social_fund_project_evaluation_report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

General comments on the above feedback<br />

Clearly the feedback is very positive in relation to the event location, timing and<br />

convenience. That level <strong>of</strong> agreement reduces slightly in relation to the appropriateness <strong>of</strong><br />

the advice/information/help provided but reduces significantly when it comes to the<br />

question did the event meet attendees individual needs.<br />

Overall in terms <strong>of</strong> execution and attendance the event can be seen as a success, but given<br />

the relatively modest levels <strong>of</strong> satisfaction in terms <strong>of</strong> meeting individual need there is<br />

clearly room for improvement. Obviously the main aim <strong>of</strong> the event was to help people into<br />

employment and if their needs in that respect aren’t being met then this aspect needs to be<br />

discussed in some depth before the next event.<br />

Listed at appendix three are the comments written by attendees on their feedback sheets<br />

which may throw some light on why needs weren’t met in some cases. A rough thematic<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> those comments coupled with verbal feedback on the day would suggest the<br />

main failings were;<br />

• Employers didn’t engage enough<br />

• There were very few basic administration roles on <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

• A high proportion <strong>of</strong> the jobs required some degree <strong>of</strong> specific qualification or recent<br />

relevant experience.<br />

• Lack <strong>of</strong> obvious or previously provided information about jobs/employers<br />

• Long queues and lack <strong>of</strong> seating may have resulted in people not being overly<br />

positive when they then met employers<br />

The job/employer related aspects above show a mismatch between what employers had on<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer and how they presented it, and the skills, experience and confidence <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> the<br />

clients who attended.<br />

This mismatch is however a gap that could be bridged over time if more extended<br />

introductions were made to employers with, and on behalf <strong>of</strong> clients and if employers were<br />

helped to be more flexible in terms <strong>of</strong> their recruitment criteria. This mismatch <strong>of</strong> people<br />

and jobs was also illustrated by some <strong>of</strong> the employers both verbally and on their feedback<br />

forms.<br />

Verbal feedback on the day, having spoken to other staff in attendance, would also suggest<br />

that rather than coaching attendees at workshops before the event it may in future be<br />

worth coaching employers as to how to effectively engage with the client group.<br />

Certain employers didn’t create an air <strong>of</strong> approachability and with many <strong>of</strong> our client group<br />

lacking confidence particularly in group situations barriers <strong>of</strong> this nature have to be broken<br />

down. It was also felt that a more relaxed approach from the employers, i.e. dressing less<br />

formally and perhaps standing in front <strong>of</strong> their tables not behind, might have helped put<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!