Welfare Reform Team Evaluation of European Social Fund pilot project 2014-2015

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Barton Job Fair July 2015 - Appendix 2 Summary of data from client feedback forms Was the location accessible? Reply Total % Agree 127 77 Slightly Agree 27 16 Slightly Disagree 8 5 Disagree 3 2 Was the time convenient? Reply Total % Agree 144 88 Slightly Agree 15 10 Slightly Disagree 2 1 Disagree 2 1 Was the day of the week suitable? Reply Total % Agree 141 86 Slightly Agree 17 11 Slightly Disagree 4 2 Disagree 2 1 Was the help/advice/information appropriate? Reply Total % Agree 128 78 Slightly Agree 26 16 Slightly Disagree 8 5 Disagree 1 1 Did the event meet your individual needs? Reply Total % Agree 92 57 Slightly Agree 41 25 Slightly Disagree 19 12 Disagree 10 6 How did you hear about the event? Source Total Job Centre 50 Poster 22 Local press 21 Other 18 Daily info 18 Leaflet 17 Staff 15 Direct Mail 12 Radio 2 6
Barton Job Fair July 2015 – Appendix 3 Summary of data from client feedback forms Written comments added to client feedback forms - Maybe more written information - Best jobs fair I have attended - Should be places to sit down and fill in job applications - Please could employers/recruiters have definite info re rates of pay for all positions available for attendees to use for comparison VERY IMPORTANT - I enjoyed the ambience and willingness of exhibitors - Not much of what I needed, no admin roles or receptionist, only 2 customer roles less than 30 hours - Everything was fine only the drinks machine broke - Would have been better at the weekend and the recruitment teams weren’t very engaging - Thought the event included vacancies re new build at Barton – Nothing! - Not enough driving opportunities - Nice to be offered drink and food and good to have a wide range of jobs to suit everyone - More approach from the employers - Some of the employer representatives seemed cold and they wanted to get rid of me - Have this more than once - There wasn’t many jobs I would be able to do without qualifications - Excellent service from all companies with stalls - Venue could have been larger, seemed a little cramped/crowded - Thank you – Great! - A large variety of employers - Considering the need to fill in forms more seating and table, very cramped and makes it difficult for those of us with mobility issues - More information on health i.e. promoting good health due to increase in obesity - Useful, friendly, well run and organised - Good, very good - This event was really good and helpful - Seems to be a lot of retail and construction, not many data admin or techy jobs - It was good - Would have been helpful to have the list of employers beforehand - Happy to be here - Staff seemed reluctant to engage me I had to ask for info despite it being obvious that I was interested, no-one seemed to want to provide info - Well organised, good idea to have food and drink, thank you! - The staff from Oxford City Council were very helpful 7
Page 1 and 2:
Welfare Reform Team Evaluation of E
Page 3 and 4:
The project in numbers 230 particip
Page 5 and 6:
found very difficult to cope with,
Page 7 and 8:
Partnerships This section outlines
Page 9 and 10:
• the setting up of the Welfare R
Page 11 and 12:
• two Welfare Reform Project Offi
Page 13 and 14:
Project milestones and changes to p
Page 15 and 16:
• ESF Department made an on the s
Page 17 and 18:
3. Marketing & Communications The t
Page 19 and 20:
The team has an active Twitter acco
Page 21 and 22:
4. Partnerships A key aim of the ES
Page 23 and 24:
nominated JCP work coaches, and a s
Page 25 and 26:
Customer selfrefers through DHP app
Page 27 and 28:
Customers gave lack of experience,
Page 29 and 30:
40 Confidence in finding work in th
Page 31 and 32:
DHP in future 11 . For project cust
Page 33 and 34:
Customer stories The best way to il
Page 35 and 36:
When Richard was benefit capped in
Page 37 and 38:
Ayesha Ayesha is a single parent wi
Page 39 and 40:
Laurence We helped Laurence as part
Page 41 and 42:
Mel and Ian agreed to follow both o
Page 43 and 44:
6. Performance & Documentation Meas
Page 45 and 46:
People on JSA who have not found wo
Page 47 and 48:
50% 45% 43% Confidence in ICT skill
Page 49 and 50:
Management information There was a
Page 51 and 52:
The team should consider whether da
Page 53 and 54:
There were 38 responses to the cust
Page 55 and 56:
“Want to do permitted work and ne
Page 57 and 58:
Appropriateness of referrals “Yes
Page 59 and 60:
“We supplied members of staff fro
Page 61 and 62: We met with our Communications team
Page 63 and 64: Status on leaving the project 6 6%
Page 65 and 66: funded by ESF to deliver the projec
Page 67 and 68: we felt least likely to engage with
Page 69 and 70: Appendices Appendix 1 Communication
Page 72 and 73: Questionnaire Summary Results This
Page 74 and 75: Questionnaire: Partner survey - Wel
Page 80 and 81: Respondent Name esfp18 Respondent E
Page 82: Appendix 4 DWP Unit Cost Savings fo
Page 85 and 86: | UnemployedMonths Gender | 12 - 23
Page 87 and 88: RECODE of | LeavgStat | (LeavingSta
Page 89 and 90: -------------------+---------------
Page 91 and 92: CHI SQUARE TESTS OF ASSOCIATION . t
Page 93 and 94: . tab LeavgStat2 Ethnicity3, row co
Page 95 and 96: . tab LeavgStat2 debt, row col exac
Page 97 and 98: Questionnaire Summary Results This
Page 99 and 100: The Job Fair was useful to encourag
Page 101 and 102: Questionnaire: Customer survey - We
Page 103 and 104: Questionnaire: Customer survey - We
Page 105 and 106: Respondent Name Respondent Email Ad
Page 107 and 108: Barton Neighbourhood Job Fair 15 th
Page 109 and 110: General comments on the above feedb
Page 111: Barton Job Fair July 2015 - Appendi
Page 115 and 116: Barton Job Fair July 2015 - Summary
Page 118: Welfare Reform Team Oxford City Cou
show all

Welfare Reform Team Evaluation of European Social Fund pilot project 2014-2015

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?