Welfare Reform Team Evaluation of European Social Fund pilot project 2014-2015
welfare_reform_european_social_fund_project_evaluation_report
welfare_reform_european_social_fund_project_evaluation_report
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Management information<br />
There was a requirement to collect and report management information (MI) on all<br />
participants in the <strong>project</strong>. MI was collated and reported to the managing authority on<br />
a quarterly basis in accordance with the guidelines supplied to the team by the ESF<br />
department at the DWP.<br />
Primarily this information was recorded by caseworkers at the initial face to face<br />
meeting with each participant in the <strong>project</strong>. In certain instances this information was<br />
collected at a subsequent meeting, on a phone call, or was reported to us by a<br />
referring local partner with the participant’s permission.<br />
The participants’ questions fall into two distinct categories:<br />
i) MI that was required by the DWP to aggregate the outcomes <strong>of</strong> the <strong>pilot</strong><br />
<strong>project</strong>s and measure the diversity and demographics <strong>of</strong> the participants<br />
ii) A series <strong>of</strong> questions on entering the <strong>project</strong> expressing the participant’s<br />
confidence around work readiness, personal budgeting and financial<br />
management, IT skill levels and access to the internet.<br />
The required MI is date <strong>of</strong> birth, post code, level <strong>of</strong> qualifications passed,<br />
employment status on entering the <strong>project</strong> and ethnicity.<br />
Documentation<br />
Day to day <strong>project</strong> management was documented on Excel spreadsheets with drop<br />
down fields and standardised data capture.<br />
Participant data was collected in two ways. First, data from the participant when we<br />
first interviewed them (the triage process). Secondly, with consent we obtained data<br />
from the partners that participants are referred to.<br />
Performance data was captured in Excel files so validation could be carried out (e.g.<br />
ensuring all variables add up to the total number <strong>of</strong> participants). Participant data<br />
was also separately collated in our case management records.<br />
Data was held on a dedicated server within the City Council’s intranet, which can<br />
only be accessed by authorised users with a password. Any data provided by way <strong>of</strong><br />
evaluation was anonymised for reporting purposes.<br />
Physical copies <strong>of</strong> all documents are stored in logged and tagged storage boxes in<br />
the secure document storage facility at the council <strong>of</strong>fices in St Aldate’s.<br />
49