AT BEFORDRE ELEVERNES FÆLLES DIALOG - Opgavebank
AT BEFORDRE ELEVERNES FÆLLES DIALOG - Opgavebank
AT BEFORDRE ELEVERNES FÆLLES DIALOG - Opgavebank
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Abstract<br />
Promoting common dialogue between pupils.<br />
- An action research project in an 8th grade class<br />
Master Thesis by Tomas Breinholdt Madariaga.<br />
This thesis deals with Danish teachers’ reasons for and ways of promoting common dialogue<br />
between pupils in the 8th grade in the Danish lower secondary school. In this context collective class<br />
conversations on prose fiction are brought into focus. The thesis consists of a theoretical part and a<br />
pragmatic action research project with an emphasis on the latter.<br />
The first part of this thesis is a study of theoretical concepts regarding dialogic teaching. First of all<br />
it describes how the dialogic researchers Martin Nystrand and Olga Dysthe have put forward a<br />
series of techniques to encourage common dialogue among pupils. Three of their most central<br />
techniques are authentic questions, uptake, and high evaluation which aim at promoting pupils’ own<br />
oral statements. In Dysthe’s and Nystrand’s view dialogic teaching is predominantly a matter of<br />
encouraging the pupils to participate in the construction of knowledge. The argument Nystrand and<br />
Dysthe put forward in favor of promoting common dialogue is that pupils can learn to express their<br />
view in many ways through oral interaction with each other. Also Nystrand has added dialogic<br />
spells, student questions, and open discussion as concepts which can support the teacher’s<br />
promotion of- and reflections on - dialogic teaching. Dysthe has added Jean Lave’s & Etienne<br />
Wenger’s situated learning theory in order to stress that learning and dialogue among pupils is a<br />
matter of joining communities of practice.<br />
In addition to Nystrand’s and Dysthe’s research, this thesis examines Robin Alexander’s<br />
characterization of dialogic teaching as well as Rupert Wegerif’s argument for promoting common<br />
dialogue among pupils. Furthermore, the thesis emphasizes Louise Rosenblatt’s theory about the<br />
efferent stance and the aesthetic stance since these describe how the target of readings affects the<br />
subsequent collective class conservation. Finally, central and theoretical viewpoints on dialogic<br />
teaching are discussed. This discussion draws attention to the fact that according to Dysthe teacher<br />
monologues are to a certain extent part of every teaching practice in Danish schools. The discussion