Ganganalytische Bewertung der Eigenschaften von Orthesen für ...

3. Ergebnisse Abbildung 3.16 - 97 –
Ortheseneigenschaften .Schlechte vs. gute Muskelfunktion
Bemerkungen: Plantarflexions-Funktion schlecht (3) (Ref. ± VertrBer.= graues Band)
name oan0lld8
Datum R19971986 L19971986
Konfig. 16
errMean R 0.164 L 0.164 mm
errMax R 0.867 L 0.867 mm
errLength R 4.725 L 4.725 mm
ax R 1.9 L 1.9 S 2.2 mm
ay R 0.0 L 0.0 S 0.0 mm
az R 98.2 L 98.2 S 1.3 mm
angPlatez R -7.922 L -7.922 deg
angAxisx R 0.000 L 0.000 deg
angAxisz R 1.727 L 1.727 deg
angFy R 0.703 L 0.703 deg
angFz R 2.108 L 2.108 deg
nMean R 327 L 327 frames
orthType R 2 L 2 S 0
mass R 593 L 593 S 198 g
wCuff R 100 L 100 S 9 mm
tCuff R 136 L 136 S 2 mm
hCuff R 333 L 333 S 8 mm
leverArm R 235 L 235 S 10 mm
angPlantar R -671.3 L -671.3 S 3.0 deg
angDorsi R -662.0 L -662.0 S 3.4 deg
angRange R 9.9 L 9.9 S 1.4 deg
latPlay R 2.7 L 2.7 S 0.5 deg
frictStat R 0.814 L 0.814 S 0.279 N.m
frictDyn R -0.830 L -0.830 S 0.279 N.m
Fmax R 150 L 150 S 1 N
Mymax R 33.3 L 33.3 S 1.2 N.m
MyIndex R 94.5 L 94.5 S 5.5 %F.L
Mzmax R 7.0 L 7.0 S 1.8 N.m
Mxmax R -0.1 L -0.1 S 0.6 N.m
displMax R 21.0 L 21.0 S 1.0 mm
displIndex R 14.0 L 14.0 S 0.8 %L
angBendMax R 3.3 L 3.3 S 0.2 deg
angTorsMax R 4.1 L 4.1 S 0.4 deg
angFronMax R -0.0 L -0.0 S 0.3 deg
mBending R 11.443 L 11.443 S 4.483 N.m/de
mBendIndx R 32.345 L 32.345 S 12.239 %FL/de
mTorsion R 2.144 L 2.144 S 0.572 N.m/de
mTorsIndx R 6.024 L 6.024 S 1.824 %FL/de
mFrontal R -0.071 L -0.071 S 0.183 N.m/de
mFronIndx R -0.247 L -0.247 S 0.514 %FL/de
mDispl R 8.368 L 8.368 S 0.807 N/mm
mDisplIndx R 13.621 L 13.621 S 1.691 F/L
energy R 1.637 L 1.637 S 0.066 J
energyBend R 73.4 L 73.4 S 4.8 %enrgy
energyTors R 17.6 L 17.6 S 8.0 %enrgy
hyster R 11.1 L 11.1 S 0.7 %enrgy
hysterBend R 18.3 L 18.3 S 0.3 %hyst
hysterTors R 5.4 L 5.4 S 1.7 %hyst