24.02.2013 Views

Qualification of the Assembly Process of Flip-Chip BGA Packages ...

Qualification of the Assembly Process of Flip-Chip BGA Packages ...

Qualification of the Assembly Process of Flip-Chip BGA Packages ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.1 Results<br />

Texas Tech University, Nivetha Shivan, May 2012<br />

CHAPTER 6<br />

DATA AND ANALYSIS<br />

6.1.1 Pre-engineering <strong>Qualification</strong> Phase I<br />

6.1.1.1 Stress Test Results<br />

44 units were subjected to MSL3 pre-conditioning. These units were <strong>the</strong>n divided into 2<br />

lots and each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se lots were subjected to temperature cycling and pressure cooker test<br />

respectively. The full qual and FYI read points were taken. Since <strong>the</strong> quality level chosen<br />

for this project is LTPD=10, 22 devices were considered from each DOE for <strong>the</strong> stress<br />

tests with an acceptance number <strong>of</strong> 0. Table 6.1 shows <strong>the</strong> stress test results from Phase I.<br />

Table 6.1: Stress Test Results from Phase I<br />

CSAM analysis post MSL3 soak and TCT showed no abnormality. All four DOEs<br />

showed suspected failure locations in <strong>the</strong> CSAM image after PCT 288 Hours which is <strong>the</strong><br />

robustness readpoint. This tells us <strong>the</strong> part may not be robust after 288 hours <strong>of</strong> applying<br />

<strong>the</strong> pressure cooker conditions. Fur<strong>the</strong>r analysis during electrical verification in Phase II<br />

was required. The three major anomalies seen in <strong>the</strong>se CSAM images were:<br />

� A white area in <strong>the</strong> underfill region<br />

This was suspected to be a delamination in <strong>the</strong> underfill region. Cross-section was<br />

performed to validate <strong>the</strong> suspected failure. Figure 6.1 shows CSAM image <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

suspected failure location. Figure 6.2 shows <strong>the</strong> SEM image <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bump after cross<br />

section.<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!