25.02.2013 Views

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.6 <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Permeability</strong> <strong>of</strong> Isolated Astomatous Cuticular Membranes 103<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> humidity<br />

2.4 a CM control<br />

2.0<br />

CM methylated<br />

1.6<br />

1.2<br />

0.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

b<br />

MX control<br />

MX methylated<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

Relative humidity (%)<br />

Fig. 4.18 Effect <strong>of</strong> relative humidity in the receiver on water permeance (Pw) <strong>of</strong> Prunus laurocerasus<br />

CM <strong>and</strong> MX at 25 ◦ C. Permeance was measured using tritiated water in the donor <strong>and</strong><br />

isolated astomatous cuticular membranes (CM), or polymer matrix membranes (MX). Methylation<br />

<strong>of</strong> membranes was obtained by diazomethane. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals. Data<br />

were taken from Schreiber et al. (2001)<br />

equal to 9.72 ×10 −10 ms −1 , Pw <strong>and</strong> PBA are numerically equal. If PBA is lower, then<br />

Pw > PBA, <strong>and</strong> if PBA is larger than 9.72×10 −10 ms −1 , Pw < PBA. For example, when<br />

PBA = 10 −8 ms −1 , Pw is 6.3 × 10 −9 ms −1 . With species having PBA <strong>of</strong> 10 −10 ms −1 ,<br />

the calculated Pw is a little higher (1.2 × 10 −10 ms −1 ). This could be taken as evidence<br />

that in CM from species having a low permeance for benzoic acid, some water<br />

diffused in aqueous pores, while in CM having a high BA permeance, all or most<br />

water diffuses in the waxy path, <strong>and</strong> the contribution <strong>of</strong> a parallel aqueous paths<br />

goes unnoticed. In view <strong>of</strong> the large error bars seen in Fig. 4.17, this conclusion<br />

may very well be wrong.<br />

Both permeances are related to D, K <strong>and</strong> ℓ, <strong>and</strong> this can be written as<br />

logPw<br />

logPBA<br />

= log(DwKww)/ℓ<br />

= 0.86. (4.20)<br />

log(DBAKBA)/ℓ<br />

If water <strong>and</strong> benzoic acid use the same waxy pathway,ℓ is the same <strong>and</strong> cancels. Kww<br />

for benzoic acid is around 20 for waxes <strong>of</strong> P. laurocerasus, G. biloba <strong>and</strong> J. regia.<br />

The respective DBA values in waxes <strong>of</strong> these species are 3.5 × 10 −17 , 4.4 × 10 −17<br />

<strong>and</strong> 5.6×10 −17 m 2 s −1 . This is the sequence seen on the regression line in Fig. 4.17.<br />

Dw × Kww is not known for these three species, but their products should be smaller<br />

by a factor <strong>of</strong> 7.2 (10 0.86 ). The wax–water partition coefficient for water is much<br />

smaller than for benzoic acid, which implies that D for water must be considerably<br />

larger than for benzoic acid.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!