Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...
Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...
Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4.4 <strong>Water</strong> Vapour Sorption <strong>and</strong> <strong>Permeability</strong> as Affected by pH, Cations <strong>and</strong> Vapour Pressure 77<br />
in Citrus MX the reticulum contains carboxyl groups <strong>and</strong> is continuous across the<br />
entire polymer matrix, including the cuticle proper. This is convincing evidence,<br />
even though such a reticulum is rarely seen in TEM (Sect. 1.4). The aqueous pores<br />
across the polymer matrix formed by the reticulum are further characterised in<br />
Sect. 4.5. Comparable data for MX from other plant species, including those having<br />
a lamellated cuticle proper, are not available.<br />
Polar polymers sorb much more water than hydrophobic ones, <strong>and</strong> permeance<br />
increases with increasing partial pressure (Fig. 4.5) because <strong>of</strong> increased sorption<br />
<strong>of</strong> water (Barrie 1968). Sorption in the polymer matrix was measured with carboxyl<br />
groups in the hydrogen form, that is, in absence <strong>of</strong> inorganic cations (Chamel<br />
et al. 1991). Sorption isotherms are not linear (Fig. 4.7) <strong>and</strong> resemble B.E.T. type<br />
II isotherms. <strong>Water</strong> vapour sorption in tomato <strong>and</strong> Citrus MX was similar to that in<br />
EC. For the MX, sorption close to 100% humidity is not available, but extrapolation<br />
leads to figures somewhere between 70 <strong>and</strong> 80gkg −1 , which is 7–8% by weight.<br />
The plateau seen in Fig. 4.6 for permeance <strong>of</strong> MX is strikingly absent in sorption<br />
data (Fig. 4.7). This may be due to the fact that sorption in MX was measured with<br />
carboxyl groups in the hydrogen form <strong>and</strong> in the absence <strong>of</strong> inorganic counter ions.<br />
COOH <strong>and</strong> OH groups probably sorb similar amounts <strong>of</strong> water, because characteristic<br />
dipole moments for COOH <strong>and</strong> OH groups are similar <strong>and</strong> amount to 1.7 <strong>and</strong><br />
1.65 Debye respectively (Israelachvili 1991).<br />
Sorption in tomato fruit cutin was considerably lower, <strong>and</strong> the isotherm was linear.<br />
Sorption at 100% humidity was 19gkg −1 , which is only about 25% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
amount sorbed in the tomato MX. Cutin was generated by acid hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> tomato<br />
fruit MX (6 N HCl, 110 ◦ C, 12 h). This hydrolysis eliminates polysaccharides <strong>and</strong><br />
polypeptides, <strong>and</strong> probably also liberates phenolic compounds bound covalently to<br />
the MX (Schönherr <strong>and</strong> Bukovac 1973). The bulk (75%) <strong>of</strong> the water in the MX is<br />
sorbed by dipoles contributed by these compounds.<br />
Polyethylene also has a linear sorption isotherm, <strong>and</strong> maximum sorption at 100%<br />
humidity is 0.65kgm −3 (Table 4.1). With a specific gravity <strong>of</strong> 950kgm −3 maximum<br />
sorption is 0.68gkg −1 . Hence, cutin sorbed 28 times more water than PE. Most <strong>of</strong><br />
this water is probably bound to free hydroxyl groups <strong>of</strong> cutin acids. When 19 g water<br />
is sorbed in 1 kg cutin, this amounts to 1.06molkg −1 . Tomato fruit cutin is made up<br />
mainly <strong>of</strong> C16-dihydroxyfatty acids (Baker et al. 1982), which have a molecular<br />
weight around 300gmol −1 . This yields a concentration <strong>of</strong> 3.33 mol hydroxy fatty<br />
acids per kg <strong>of</strong> cutin. Hence, only a third <strong>of</strong> the mid-chain hydroxyl groups sorbed<br />
a water molecule at 100% humidity. Those hydroxyl groups that did not sorb water<br />
were probably engaged in intermolecular hydrogen bonds, <strong>and</strong> this indicates that<br />
they were not distributed at r<strong>and</strong>om but are arranged close to each other.<br />
At a partial pressure <strong>of</strong> 0.22, permeance was smaller by a factor <strong>of</strong> 0.5 than<br />
at p/p0 = 1. Sorption in MX at p/p0 = 0.22 is about 10gkg −1 , while at p/p0 = 1<br />
sorption amounted to about 70–80gkg −1 . With ethyl cellulose the difference is even<br />
larger (Fig. 4.7). It follows that permeance <strong>and</strong> water content <strong>of</strong> the membranes<br />
were not proportional. Apparently, not all water sorbed in the MX participated in<br />
transport.