25.02.2013 Views

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

246 8 Effects <strong>of</strong> Temperature on Sorption <strong>and</strong> Diffusion <strong>of</strong> <strong>Solute</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Penetration <strong>of</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />

log k ∗<br />

infinite<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

- 5<br />

log k ∗<br />

infinite = - 3.27 + (1.44E D 10 -3 /R)<br />

MX<br />

-10<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18<br />

CM<br />

log k ∗<br />

infinite = - 5.24 +(1.37E D 10 -3 /R)<br />

Hedera helix/IAA<br />

Enthalpy <strong>of</strong> diffusion x 10 -3 x R -1<br />

Fig. 8.5 Dependence <strong>of</strong> Arrhenius y-intercepts (log k ∗<br />

infinite ) on slopes (ED/R) measured with<br />

IAA <strong>and</strong> ivy CM or MX membranes<br />

Theoretically, the mean free path <strong>of</strong> diffusion can be calculated using (8.11), but<br />

our y-intercept is not Do but rather log k ∗ infinite. In order to convert k ∗ to D we would<br />

need the thicknesses <strong>of</strong> the membrane compartments involved, which are not known<br />

<strong>and</strong> would have to be assumed (Sect. 6.3.2). This would result in arbitrary estimates<br />

<strong>of</strong> λ . Still, the y-intercept increased when waxes were extracted, <strong>and</strong> this increase is<br />

proportional to λ 2 <strong>and</strong> to entropy [exp(∆S/R)]. Flexibility <strong>of</strong> the cutin polymer may<br />

well be higher than in amorphous waxes, allowing for a more frequent formation <strong>of</strong><br />

larger voids in cutin than in amorphous waxes. This might have contributed to the<br />

differences in y-intercepts after extraction <strong>of</strong> waxes. However, an effect <strong>of</strong> extraction<br />

on ∆S cannot be precluded, <strong>and</strong> a separation <strong>of</strong> the two factors is not possible at<br />

this time. It is clear, however, that the micro-environment in which diffusion took<br />

place was not affected by extraction <strong>of</strong> waxes. The slopes, that is, the free energy<br />

relationship were not affected; only the free energy involved in diffusion was lower<br />

(Fig. 8.5). As in waxes, diffusion across MX membranes <strong>of</strong> lipophilic solutes takes<br />

place in the methylene group environment <strong>of</strong> cutin, but this differs structurally.<br />

Buchholz <strong>and</strong> Schönherr (2000) suggested that the difference in y-intercepts<br />

between CM <strong>and</strong> MX might be due in part to a much higher tortuosity in CM.<br />

From the difference in y-intercepts between MX <strong>and</strong> CM, tortuosity factors ranging<br />

from 25 to 5,000 can be calculated. Factors <strong>of</strong> 25–100 might be plausible, but a factor<br />

<strong>of</strong> 5,000 is incomprehensible. Waxes are expected to decrease the length <strong>of</strong> the<br />

diffusion path, because wax crystallites embedded in cutin represent excluded volume<br />

<strong>and</strong> solutes must diffuse around them. This concept <strong>of</strong> a barrier membrane was<br />

introduced by Riederer <strong>and</strong> Schreiber (1995). It is plausible, but some <strong>of</strong> the assumptions<br />

can be questioned (Fowler 1999). In some thin cuticles (e.g. Citrus) there is<br />

simply not enough space in the limiting skin to accommodate many superimposed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!