25.02.2013 Views

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

248 8 Effects <strong>of</strong> Temperature on Sorption <strong>and</strong> Diffusion <strong>of</strong> <strong>Solute</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Penetration <strong>of</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />

relationship between EP, ED <strong>and</strong> ∆HS as determined with homogeneous synthetic<br />

polymer membranes.<br />

Using the system buffer/CM/buffer <strong>and</strong> tritiated water, Pw was measured at<br />

various temperatures (Schönherr et al. 1979).<br />

<strong>Water</strong> permeance <strong>of</strong> CM increased with temperature, <strong>and</strong> Arrhenius plots ln<br />

Pw vs 1/T had two linear portions which intersected at about 44 ◦ C. EP was<br />

52kJ mol −1 (5–40 ◦ C) <strong>and</strong> 185kJ mol −1 (50–65 ◦ C) respectively. The plot for MX<br />

was slightly convex to the abscissa, <strong>and</strong> Pw was much higher. The differences<br />

between the plots for CM <strong>and</strong> MX decrease with increasing temperature. If the<br />

straight line for the CM is extrapolated to 72 ◦ C, the plots for CM <strong>and</strong> MX converge<br />

(Fig. 8.6). The melting range <strong>of</strong> Citrus wax is 72–77 ◦ C (Reynhardt <strong>and</strong> Riederer<br />

1991), <strong>and</strong> when waxes are molten <strong>and</strong> fluid the waxy transport barrier breaks<br />

down completely. Above 44 ◦ C the slope <strong>of</strong> the Arrhenius plot for the CM suddenly<br />

increases, <strong>and</strong> a kink is clearly visible. There is no discontinuity or kink in the<br />

Arrhenius plot for the MX. Similarly, the Arrhenius plot for solute mobility in CM<br />

<strong>of</strong> Citrus (IAA) is linear up to 50. With Hedera CM/bifenox, linearity was maintained<br />

up to 75 ◦ C. The kink or bend in the Arrhenius plot occurred only with Pw<br />

<strong>and</strong> CM, but not with Pw for MX or with solute mobility in CM.<br />

ln P w (m/s)<br />

-7<br />

-8<br />

-9<br />

-10<br />

-11<br />

-12<br />

-13<br />

-14<br />

-15<br />

-16<br />

-17<br />

-18<br />

72<br />

60 50 40 30 21 13 5<br />

Hedera k ∗<br />

(bifenox)<br />

Citrus CM (P w)<br />

Temperature (∞C )<br />

2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7<br />

1/T x 1000 (Kelvin -1 )<br />

Citrus MX (P w)<br />

Citrus k ∗ (IAA)<br />

Fig. 8.6 Arrhenius plots showing the effects <strong>of</strong> temperature on water permeance (Pw) <strong>of</strong> Citrus<br />

aurantium CM <strong>and</strong> MX. The membranes separated aqueous buffers at pH 6 containing<br />

CaCl2 (0.01mol l −1 ) <strong>and</strong> water fluxes were measured using tritiated water. For comparison rate<br />

constants (k ∗ ) determined with Hedera/bifenox <strong>and</strong> Citrus IAA were included. <strong>Water</strong> permeance<br />

data were taken from Schönherr et al. (1979). Rate constants were taken from Fig. 8.3<br />

-8<br />

-10<br />

-12<br />

-14<br />

-16<br />

-18<br />

ln Rate constant k ∗ (s -1 )

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!