25.02.2013 Views

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.1 Models for Analysing Mass Transfer 37<br />

2.1.3 Model 3<br />

Mass transfer across a membrane may also be analysed in analogy to a first order<br />

chemical reaction. In this case, the change in urea concentration in the receiver with<br />

time (molm −3 s −1 ) is taken to be proportional to donor concentration:<br />

∆Creceiver<br />

∆t<br />

= kCdonor. (2.6)<br />

This proportionality coefficient (k) is a rate constant having the dimension s −1 .<br />

Membrane area <strong>and</strong> thickness do not enter into calculation. Example calculations<br />

will be presented below.<br />

All <strong>of</strong> these three models have been used in studies <strong>of</strong> permeability <strong>of</strong> cuticles.<br />

The choice among the models depends on the particular situation. P, D or k are<br />

parameters which contain information about properties <strong>of</strong> cuticles <strong>and</strong> solutes <strong>and</strong><br />

their interactions. They are essential when we want to find out why permeability <strong>of</strong><br />

cuticles from different genotypes differs, <strong>and</strong> why it depends on the type <strong>of</strong> solute<br />

<strong>and</strong> on environmental factors. These models <strong>and</strong> equations are simple <strong>and</strong> straightforward<br />

to use. In spite <strong>of</strong> this, most researchers in the past measured penetration or<br />

“uptake” during only a single time interval. From these data P, D or k can not be<br />

calculated, <strong>and</strong> we are left with huge amounts <strong>of</strong> uncorrelated data.<br />

2.1.4 Conductance <strong>and</strong> Resistance<br />

Most students are familiar with Ohm’s law, which is analogous to models 1 <strong>and</strong> 2<br />

except that it deals with electrons rather than molecules (mass transfer). If the ends<br />

<strong>of</strong> a piece <strong>of</strong> wire (a conductor <strong>of</strong> electricity) are connected to a battery, a current<br />

will flow. Current is the number <strong>of</strong> electrons that flow per unit cross-section <strong>of</strong> the<br />

wire under a difference <strong>of</strong> electrical potential (volt):<br />

current = conductance× potential difference. (2.7)<br />

If the length <strong>of</strong> the conductor is also considered, the factor <strong>of</strong> proportionality is<br />

called conductivity:<br />

current× lenght = conductivity× potential difference. (2.8)<br />

These equations are <strong>of</strong> the same type as (2.2) <strong>and</strong> (2.3), which state that mass flux<br />

(2.2) or mass flux times membrane thickness (2.3) are proportional to concentration<br />

difference. This analogy may ease the apprehension some biologists experience<br />

when dealing with Fick’s law.<br />

The reciprocal <strong>of</strong> conductance is the electrical resistance, <strong>and</strong> 1/conductivity is<br />

called resistivity. This convention can also be used with mass conduction. For a<br />

perfect analogy, we rename the permeability coefficient (P) from (2.2) <strong>and</strong> call it

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!