25.02.2013 Views

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.1 Sorption <strong>of</strong> Plasticisers in Wax <strong>and</strong> Cutin 209<br />

Table 7.1 Wax/water partition coefficients Kww <strong>of</strong> monodisperse alcohol ethoxylates in reconstituted<br />

wax <strong>of</strong> Hordeum vulgare, Stephanotis floribunda <strong>and</strong> Chenopodium album. Cx gives the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> carbon atoms <strong>of</strong> the fatty alcohol, <strong>and</strong> Ey refers to the number <strong>of</strong> ethylene oxide units<br />

in the polar part <strong>of</strong> the alcohol ethoxylates<br />

Compound cmc(mol kg −1 ) a Kww<br />

H. vulgare S. floribunda b C. album c<br />

C4E2 0.589 0.083 d – –<br />

C6E 3 0.06 0.83 d – –<br />

C8E 4 0.0062 4.9 d – –<br />

C10E 5 0.00063 35.7 d – –<br />

C10E 8 0.0012 5.6 e – –<br />

C12E2 0.000028 2,000 e 21,125 –<br />

C12E3 0.000035 1,300 e – 1,610<br />

C12E4 0.000043 670 e 7,909 –<br />

C12E5 0.000053 400 e 4,439 687<br />

C12E6 0.000066 201 d 2,626 268<br />

C12E7 0.000079 160 e – 203<br />

C12E8 0.000098 104 b 962 109<br />

C14E3 0.0000029 – – 19,700<br />

C14E5 0.0000044 – – 8,040<br />

C14E6 0.0000054 – – 3,700<br />

C14E7 0.0000066 1,561 d – –<br />

C14E8 0.0000081 1,200 e – 1,410<br />

C16E 3 0.00000024 – – 231,000<br />

C16E 8 0.00000068 12,350 d 13,700<br />

a Calculated according to Riederer <strong>and</strong> Schreiber (1995)<br />

b Data from Simanova et al. (2005)<br />

c Data from Burghardt et al. (2006)<br />

d Data from Schreiber et al. (1996b)<br />

e Data from Burghardt et al. (1998)<br />

With all three wax samples, log Kww decreased by the factor <strong>of</strong> −0.23 to −0.24<br />

for each additional ethylene oxide (E) unit. For barley (7.1) <strong>and</strong> Chenopodium wax<br />

(7.2), log Kww increased by the factor <strong>of</strong> 0.53–0.54 for each additional C atom.<br />

Equations for barley <strong>and</strong> Chenopodium wax are identical within experimental error<br />

(Burghardt et al. 1998, 2006). With Stephanotis the number <strong>of</strong> C atoms was constant<br />

(C12), <strong>and</strong> only Ey was varied (Simanova et al. 2005). Hence, (7.3) is only available<br />

in a reduced form describing the influence <strong>of</strong> Ey units on Kww. These results are<br />

consistent with data published for linear alcohols <strong>and</strong> fatty acids by Dunn et al.<br />

(1986), from which it can be calculated that for each -CH2 group added log Kow<br />

increased by a factor 0.55–0.52. Thus, the influence <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> E <strong>and</strong> C units<br />

on log Kww is similar for all three wax samples; however, the absolute values can<br />

vary by a factor <strong>of</strong> 10 depending on plant species. Using (7.1)–(7.3), Kww can be<br />

estimated accurately for other monodisperse alcohol ethoxylates.<br />

Cmc <strong>of</strong> surfactants <strong>and</strong> their lipophility (i.e., Kww) are related (Table 7.1). With<br />

increasing lipophility <strong>of</strong> the surfactants, micelles form at lower concentrations. The<br />

maximum concentration (g kg −1 ) <strong>of</strong> alcohol ethoxylates sorbed in reconstituted

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!