Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...
Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...
Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4.5 Diffusion <strong>and</strong> Viscous Transport <strong>of</strong> <strong>Water</strong> 83<br />
infinity<br />
Pviscous = Pmaximum<br />
viscous<br />
θPmaximum viscous<br />
× rsolute<br />
. (4.14)<br />
Data can also be analysed assuming that Pviscous varies linearly with the reciprocal <strong>of</strong><br />
the solute radius. Dependence was in fact linear, as the coefficients <strong>of</strong> determination<br />
were 0.99 or better at all three pH values. The following regression equations were<br />
obtained:<br />
−7 1<br />
at pH 3: Pviscous = −1.34 × 10 + 1.87 × 10<br />
rsolute<br />
−6 (r 2 = 0.997),<br />
−7 1<br />
at pH 6: Pviscous = −1.21 × 10 + 1.27 × 10<br />
rsolute<br />
−6 (r 2 = 0.985),<br />
−8 1<br />
at pH 9: Pviscous = −6.05 × 10 + 7.38 × 10<br />
rsolute<br />
−7 (r 2 = 0.999).<br />
(4.15)<br />
The constants on the right h<strong>and</strong> side <strong>of</strong> the equations are the maximum values <strong>of</strong><br />
Pviscous when rsolute approaches infinity, that is, when 1/rsolute is zero. These equations<br />
were used to calculate Pviscous for selected solute radii <strong>and</strong> results (empty<br />
symbols) were plotted in Fig. 4.9b. Experimental data are included as filled symbols.<br />
Pviscous increased in the order urea < glucose < sucrose, showing that these<br />
solutes penetrated the MX membranes to some degree (Fig. 4.9). Inspection <strong>of</strong><br />
the figure might suggest that membranes were impermeable to raffinose, but the<br />
Pmaximum viscous<br />
values obtained from the hyperbola <strong>and</strong> inverse functions were slightly<br />
larger than the experimental values (Table 4.3). The difference is smallest at<br />
pH 3 (0.06 × 10 −6 ), but at pH 6 <strong>and</strong> 9 the difference amounts to 0.27 × 10 −6<br />
<strong>and</strong> 0.12 × 10 −6 respectively. This indicates that MX membranes were not totally<br />
impermeable to raffinose.<br />
According to our hypothesis, water <strong>and</strong> polar solutes can penetrate the membrane<br />
only in aqueous pores. This is confirmed by the fact that viscous flow increased with<br />
solute size. <strong>Solute</strong>s which dissolve in the polymer matrix, that is, solutes having a<br />
high partition coefficient (2.17) would not have induced viscous water flux. Clearly,<br />
large polar solutes are discriminated, <strong>and</strong> membranes should be impermeable to<br />
solutes larger than the size <strong>of</strong> the pores (Fig. 4.9).<br />
This was tested by measuring permeability at pH 9 <strong>of</strong> MX membranes to radiolabelled<br />
water, urea <strong>and</strong> glucose (Schönherr 1976a). Sucrose, raffinose or larger<br />
Table 4.3 Values <strong>of</strong> P experimental<br />
viscous (ms−1 ) obtained experimentally with raffinose, <strong>and</strong> values calculated<br />
by regression analysis (Pmaximum viscous ) based on a hyperbola or an inverse function. In the last<br />
column, the means <strong>of</strong> the fitted values are given<br />
pH P experimental<br />
viscous<br />
Pmaximum viscous hyperbola Pmaximum viscous inv. function Pmaximum viscous mean<br />
3.0 0.68 × 10 −6 0.80 × 10 −6 0.68 × 10 −6 0.74 × 10 −6<br />
6.0 1.08 × 10 −6 1.43 × 10 −6 1.27 × 10 −6 1.35 × 10 −6<br />
9.0 1.80 × 10 −6 1.97 × 10 −6 1.87 × 10 −6 1.92 × 10 −6