25.02.2013 Views

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.5 Diffusion <strong>and</strong> Viscous Transport <strong>of</strong> <strong>Water</strong> 83<br />

infinity<br />

Pviscous = Pmaximum<br />

viscous<br />

θPmaximum viscous<br />

× rsolute<br />

. (4.14)<br />

Data can also be analysed assuming that Pviscous varies linearly with the reciprocal <strong>of</strong><br />

the solute radius. Dependence was in fact linear, as the coefficients <strong>of</strong> determination<br />

were 0.99 or better at all three pH values. The following regression equations were<br />

obtained:<br />

−7 1<br />

at pH 3: Pviscous = −1.34 × 10 + 1.87 × 10<br />

rsolute<br />

−6 (r 2 = 0.997),<br />

−7 1<br />

at pH 6: Pviscous = −1.21 × 10 + 1.27 × 10<br />

rsolute<br />

−6 (r 2 = 0.985),<br />

−8 1<br />

at pH 9: Pviscous = −6.05 × 10 + 7.38 × 10<br />

rsolute<br />

−7 (r 2 = 0.999).<br />

(4.15)<br />

The constants on the right h<strong>and</strong> side <strong>of</strong> the equations are the maximum values <strong>of</strong><br />

Pviscous when rsolute approaches infinity, that is, when 1/rsolute is zero. These equations<br />

were used to calculate Pviscous for selected solute radii <strong>and</strong> results (empty<br />

symbols) were plotted in Fig. 4.9b. Experimental data are included as filled symbols.<br />

Pviscous increased in the order urea < glucose < sucrose, showing that these<br />

solutes penetrated the MX membranes to some degree (Fig. 4.9). Inspection <strong>of</strong><br />

the figure might suggest that membranes were impermeable to raffinose, but the<br />

Pmaximum viscous<br />

values obtained from the hyperbola <strong>and</strong> inverse functions were slightly<br />

larger than the experimental values (Table 4.3). The difference is smallest at<br />

pH 3 (0.06 × 10 −6 ), but at pH 6 <strong>and</strong> 9 the difference amounts to 0.27 × 10 −6<br />

<strong>and</strong> 0.12 × 10 −6 respectively. This indicates that MX membranes were not totally<br />

impermeable to raffinose.<br />

According to our hypothesis, water <strong>and</strong> polar solutes can penetrate the membrane<br />

only in aqueous pores. This is confirmed by the fact that viscous flow increased with<br />

solute size. <strong>Solute</strong>s which dissolve in the polymer matrix, that is, solutes having a<br />

high partition coefficient (2.17) would not have induced viscous water flux. Clearly,<br />

large polar solutes are discriminated, <strong>and</strong> membranes should be impermeable to<br />

solutes larger than the size <strong>of</strong> the pores (Fig. 4.9).<br />

This was tested by measuring permeability at pH 9 <strong>of</strong> MX membranes to radiolabelled<br />

water, urea <strong>and</strong> glucose (Schönherr 1976a). Sucrose, raffinose or larger<br />

Table 4.3 Values <strong>of</strong> P experimental<br />

viscous (ms−1 ) obtained experimentally with raffinose, <strong>and</strong> values calculated<br />

by regression analysis (Pmaximum viscous ) based on a hyperbola or an inverse function. In the last<br />

column, the means <strong>of</strong> the fitted values are given<br />

pH P experimental<br />

viscous<br />

Pmaximum viscous hyperbola Pmaximum viscous inv. function Pmaximum viscous mean<br />

3.0 0.68 × 10 −6 0.80 × 10 −6 0.68 × 10 −6 0.74 × 10 −6<br />

6.0 1.08 × 10 −6 1.43 × 10 −6 1.27 × 10 −6 1.35 × 10 −6<br />

9.0 1.80 × 10 −6 1.97 × 10 −6 1.87 × 10 −6 1.92 × 10 −6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!