25.02.2013 Views

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Solutions 51<br />

2.7 Summary<br />

In this chapter we have presented three basic transport models, <strong>and</strong> we have shown<br />

how permeance (P), diffusion coefficients (D) <strong>and</strong> first-order rate constants (k) can<br />

be calculated from measurements <strong>of</strong> mass flux <strong>and</strong> membrane thickness. We have<br />

pointed out that it is not a good practice to compare data on mass transfer across<br />

cuticles from different species <strong>and</strong> various solutes when data are given as percent<br />

penetrated during a single arbitrary time interval. Such data can not be related to<br />

properties <strong>of</strong> cuticles or solutes.<br />

Most problems can be h<strong>and</strong>led by analogy to the above models <strong>and</strong> equations.<br />

In the chapters to follow, some additional equations are presented for analysing flux<br />

data. If new problems should arise which have not been treated here, the readers<br />

will find assistance in the books by Crank (1975), Crank <strong>and</strong> Park (1968), Cussler<br />

(1984), Hartley <strong>and</strong> Graham-Bryce (1980) <strong>and</strong> Vieth (1991).<br />

Problems<br />

1. What are the numerical values <strong>of</strong> the resistance in cell wall (P = 1.38 ×<br />

10 −4 ms −1 ) <strong>and</strong> cuticle (P = 1.46×10 −7 ms −1 ), <strong>and</strong> what is the total resistance?<br />

2. What are the steady state fluxes <strong>of</strong> urea <strong>and</strong> sucrose across a cell wall with<br />

ℓ = 1µm when the concentration difference between donor <strong>and</strong> receiver is<br />

1 × 10 −3 moll −1 ? The diffusion coefficient <strong>of</strong> sucrose in water is 5.23 × 10 −10<br />

m 2 s −1 .<br />

3. In calculations (2.15), we assumed that 2,4-D was either in the donor or in the<br />

receiver solutions. Since K is 600, some <strong>of</strong> the 2,4-D must have been in the<br />

cuticle. How much was it, <strong>and</strong> did this omission significantly affect permeance?<br />

Use a specific weight <strong>of</strong> the cuticle <strong>of</strong> 1,000kgm −3 .<br />

4. If the experiment shown in Fig. 2.9 had been terminated after 2 or 3 days, which<br />

permeance would have resulted using the steady state assumption, <strong>and</strong> how much<br />

would it differ from the true value?<br />

5. Diffusion <strong>of</strong> lipophilic solutes in cuticular waxes is a very slow process, <strong>and</strong><br />

diffusion coefficients in the range <strong>of</strong> 10 −18 to 10 −21 m 2 s −1 have been measured.<br />

How long would it take to reach Mt/M0 = 0.5 if the wax layer is 2µm thick?<br />

Solutions<br />

1. The resistance <strong>of</strong> the cell wall is 7,246sm −1 , <strong>and</strong> the resistance <strong>of</strong> the cuticle<br />

is 6.849 × 10 6 sm −1 . The sum <strong>of</strong> the two resistances is 6.857 × 10 6 sm −1 , <strong>and</strong><br />

this is not significantly different from the resistance <strong>of</strong> the cuticle. Hence, the<br />

resistance <strong>of</strong> the cell wall is negligible.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!