25.02.2013 Views

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

210 7 Accelerators Increase <strong>Solute</strong> <strong>Permeability</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cuticles</strong><br />

barley wax depends only on Ey (Burghardt et al. 1998). The contribution <strong>of</strong> Cx<br />

to maximum amounts <strong>of</strong> alcohol ethoxylates sorbed in the wax disappears from<br />

regression equations, because the increase in Kww by the addition <strong>of</strong> one C atom is<br />

compensated by the decrease <strong>of</strong> the cmc (Burghardt et al. 1998, 2006):<br />

logC max<br />

wax = 1.29 − 0.08Ey (barley wax) (7.4)<br />

A similar equation was obtained for Chenopodium wax (Burghardt et al. 2006).<br />

logC max<br />

wax = 1.61 − 0.104Ey (Chenopodium wax) (7.5)<br />

Maximum amounts <strong>of</strong> surfactant molecules which dissolve in wax are given by the<br />

product <strong>of</strong> the cmc <strong>and</strong> the Kww. In most experiments, concentrations <strong>of</strong> the alcohol<br />

ethoxylates far above the cmc are used. The variability in maximum amounts <strong>of</strong><br />

alcohol ethoxylates sorbed in reconstituted waxes is much lower than is suggested<br />

by the tremendous variability <strong>of</strong> Kww (Table 7.1).<br />

These considerations are valid only for aqueous solutions <strong>of</strong> alcohol ethoxylates.<br />

The situation changes when treatment solutions dry, which is the situation after<br />

spray applications in the field. Structures <strong>of</strong> these neat surfactant residues on the<br />

cuticle <strong>and</strong> penetration into the cuticle have not been investigated.<br />

7.1.2 Sorption <strong>of</strong> Alcohol Ethoxylates in Polymer Matrix<br />

Membranes<br />

Partition coefficients <strong>of</strong> alcohol ethoxylates for polymer matrix membranes (MX)<br />

Kmxw <strong>of</strong> Citrus aurantium (Riederer <strong>and</strong> Schreiber 1995) <strong>and</strong> Prunus laurocerasus<br />

(Burghardt et al. 2006) have also been determined. An equation which relates Cx<br />

<strong>and</strong> Ey to Kmxw for Citrus MX has been established.<br />

logKmxw = −1.78+0.52Cx − 0.17Ey<br />

(7.6)<br />

This equation resembles (7.1) <strong>and</strong> (7.2). For each C atom log Kmxw increases again<br />

by a factor <strong>of</strong> 0.52, <strong>and</strong> for each E unit log Kmxw decreases by a factor <strong>of</strong> 0.17<br />

(7.6). This is excellent evidence that the amorphous environments in cutin <strong>and</strong> wax<br />

in which alcohol ethoxylates are sorbed have similar physicochemical properties.<br />

Cutin <strong>and</strong> waxes are composed <strong>of</strong> methyl <strong>and</strong> methylene groups with small amounts<br />

<strong>of</strong> oxygen (Chap. 1). Kmxw values for alcohol ethoxylates are highly correlated with<br />

Kww values (Fig. 7.3), but the former are higher by about one order <strong>of</strong> magnitude.<br />

Linear regression equations quantitatively account for this correlation.<br />

Equation (7.7) applies to barley wax, <strong>and</strong> Citrus MX (Burghardt et al. 1998) <strong>and</strong><br />

(7.8) to Chenopodium wax <strong>and</strong> Prunus MX (Burghardt et al. 2006):<br />

logKww = −1.06+1.00log Kmxw<br />

logKww = −1.04+1.05log Kmxw<br />

(7.7)<br />

(7.8)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!