25.02.2013 Views

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

Water and Solute Permeability of Plant Cuticles: Measurement and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.3 Effects <strong>of</strong> Plasticisers on Diffusion <strong>of</strong> Lipophilic <strong>Solute</strong>s in Wax 221<br />

log D (m 2 /s)<br />

1e-15<br />

1e-16<br />

1e-17<br />

1e-18<br />

SA<br />

2,4-D<br />

MET<br />

100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260<br />

V x (cm 3 /mol)<br />

TRI TB<br />

control<br />

C 8E 4<br />

C 12E 8<br />

Fig. 7.11 Plots <strong>of</strong> the log D <strong>of</strong> lipophilic solutes as a function <strong>of</strong> their molar volumes Vx. D<br />

was determined either using a phospholipid suspension as inert desorption medium (control; blue<br />

symbols) or in the presence <strong>of</strong> the accelerators octaethylene glycol monododecyl ether (C12E8;<br />

green symbols) <strong>and</strong> tetraethylene glycol monooctyl ether (C8E 4; red symbols). Salicylic acid (SA),<br />

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), metribuzin (MET), triadimenol (TRI), tebuconazole (TB),<br />

bitertanol (BIT). Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Data redrawn from Burghardt et al.<br />

(1998)<br />

Table 7.3 Slopes β ′ , y-intercepts D0 <strong>and</strong> coefficients <strong>of</strong> determination r 2 <strong>of</strong> the regression<br />

equations fitted to data <strong>of</strong> Fig. 7.11<br />

Desorption medium β ′ (mol cm −3 ) log D0(m 2 s −1 ) r 2<br />

PLS −0.0065 −15.94 0.91<br />

C12E8 −0.0023 −15.85 0.76<br />

C8E4 −0.0011 −15.51 0.67<br />

Data from Burghardt et al. (1998)<br />

tortuosity <strong>and</strong> wax crystallinity were not affected by C12E 8 <strong>and</strong> C8E 4. This result<br />

is consistent with results <strong>of</strong> ESR experiments (Fig. 7.4) <strong>and</strong> reversibility <strong>of</strong> the<br />

plasticising effect <strong>of</strong> C12E8 on barley wax (Fig. 7.8) described in Sects 7.2 <strong>and</strong> 7.3.<br />

Figure 7.11 also indicates that the plasticising effect <strong>of</strong> the alcohol ethoxylates is<br />

larger with larger solutes having a lower D. This is also seen when the effect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

plasticisers (D/Dcontrol) is plotted against the reciprocal <strong>of</strong> Dcontrol (Fig. 7.12). The<br />

largest effects are obtained with bitertanol (which has the lowest Dcontrol) while<br />

the smallest effect is obtained with salicylic acid (which has the highest Dcontrol).<br />

Thus, diffusion <strong>of</strong> small solutes having a large D is less affected by plasticisers.<br />

All the above experiments were conducted using reconstituted cuticular waxes.<br />

These data provide insights into the molecular architecture <strong>of</strong> waxes, <strong>and</strong> show that<br />

plasticisers increase fluidity <strong>of</strong> amorphous waxes. Can these findings be extrapolated<br />

to cuticles <strong>of</strong> intact leaves?<br />

BIT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!