25.02.2013 Views

TCP/IP Tutorial and Technical Overview - IBM Redbooks

TCP/IP Tutorial and Technical Overview - IBM Redbooks

TCP/IP Tutorial and Technical Overview - IBM Redbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Anycasting<br />

Sometimes, the same <strong>IP</strong> services are provided by different hosts. For example, a<br />

user wants to download a file using FTP <strong>and</strong> the file is available on multiple FTP<br />

servers. Hosts that implement the same service provide an anycast address to<br />

other hosts that require the service. Connections are made to the first host in the<br />

anycast address group to respond. This process is used to guarantee the service<br />

is provided by the host with the best connection to the receiver.<br />

The anycast service is included in <strong>IP</strong>V6 (refer to 9.2.2, “<strong>IP</strong>v6 addressing” on<br />

page 339).<br />

3.1.5 The <strong>IP</strong> address exhaustion problem<br />

The number of networks on the Internet has been approximately doubling<br />

annually for a number of years. However, the usage of the Class A, B, <strong>and</strong> C<br />

networks differs greatly. Nearly all of the new networks assigned in the late<br />

1980s were Class B, <strong>and</strong> in 1990 it became apparent that if this trend continued,<br />

the last Class B network number would be assigned during 1994. However,<br />

Class C networks were hardly being used.<br />

The reason for this trend was that most potential users found a Class B network<br />

to be large enough for their anticipated needs, because it accommodates up to<br />

65534 hosts, while a Class C network, with a maximum of 254 hosts, severely<br />

restricts the potential growth of even a small initial network. Furthermore, most of<br />

the Class B networks being assigned were small ones. There are relatively few<br />

networks that would need as many as 65,534 host addresses, but very few for<br />

which 254 hosts would be an adequate limit. In summary, although the Class A,<br />

Class B, <strong>and</strong> Class C divisions of the <strong>IP</strong> address are logical <strong>and</strong> easy-to-use<br />

(because they occur on byte boundaries), with hindsight, they are not the most<br />

practical because Class C networks are too small to be useful for most<br />

organizations, while Class B networks are too large to be densely populated by<br />

any but the largest organizations.<br />

In May 1996, all Class A addresses were either allocated or assigned, as well as<br />

61.95 percent of Class B <strong>and</strong> 36.44 percent of Class C <strong>IP</strong> network addresses.<br />

The terms assigned <strong>and</strong> allocated in this context have the following meanings:<br />

► Assigned: The number of network numbers in use. The Class C figures are<br />

somewhat inaccurate, because the figures do not include many Class C<br />

networks in Europe, which were allocated to R<strong>IP</strong>E <strong>and</strong> subsequently<br />

assigned but which are still recorded as allocated.<br />

► Allocated: This includes all of the assigned networks <strong>and</strong> additionally, those<br />

networks that have either been reserved by IANA (for example, the 63 Class<br />

A networks are all reserved by IANA) or have been allocated to regional<br />

registries by IANA <strong>and</strong> will subsequently be assigned by those registries.<br />

86 <strong>TCP</strong>/<strong>IP</strong> <strong>Tutorial</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Overview</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!