27.02.2013 Views

The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog

The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog

The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

132 THE LOCOMOTIVE. [September,.<br />

iug in use for a sufficient length of time. Certain facts observed by Mr. Nicholls in<br />

connection with the heads described above indicate, however, that this is not the case.<br />

For instance, in the third experiment, when the pressure reached 10 lbs. the end had<br />

bulged -^^ of an inch; at 20 lbs., it had bulged jig inch; at 40 lbs., ^ inch; at 60 lbs.,<br />

T^g inch; at 80 lbs., ^ inch; at 100 lbs., ^ inch; at 120 lbs., | inch; at 140 lbs., ^ inch;<br />

at 155 lbs., -/g inch; at 170 lbs., | inch; at 185 lbs., ii inch; at 200 lbs., the bulge-A\-as.<br />

exactly | of an inch. "<strong>The</strong> pressure was now reduced to zero," says Mr. Nicholls,<br />

" and the end sjjrang back ^^ inch, leaving it with a permanent set of -f^ inch. <strong>The</strong><br />

pressure of 200 pounds was again applied on 36 separate occasions during an interval of<br />

five days, the bulging and permanent set being noted on each occasion, but without any<br />

appreciable difference from that noted above." That is, as we understand it, no<br />

tendency to increase in the set could be detected.<br />

It must be remarked, however, that the experiments we have described were con-<br />

fined to plates not very widely diff'erent in their dimensions, so that even Mr. Nicholls'<br />

rule cannot be relied upon for heads that depart very much from the proportions given<br />

in the example above.<br />

It will be seen that, considering the discrepancy in the various rules, and the insufiiciency<br />

of the data available, our knowledge<br />

of the strength of flat unstayed heads is<br />

very meager; and the moral is, as in all other<br />

such cases in engineering practice, that<br />

we should avoid such heads whenever it is<br />

possible to do so, and should use in the place<br />

of them something that we know more about.<br />

Bumped up heads are therefore recommended<br />

'<br />

in cases where braces cannot be used. ^ 'i \ v_J<br />

Fig. 4. Fig. 5.<br />

In horizontal tubular boilers a considerable part of the head is held by the tubes;<br />

and as it is of the highest importance to know to what extent we can rely upon the<br />

holding power of tubes, numerous experiments have been made, with tubes set in various-<br />

ways, to determine this point. In 1880 we instituted two series of tests on tubes rolled<br />

with the Dudgeon expander, as there was some question among engineers, at that time,<br />

about the effectiveness of this tool. We arranged with Messrs. H. B. Beach & Son,<br />

boiler-makers in this city, to prepare for us three specimens composed of tubes three-<br />

inches in external diameter, rolled into f-inch plate in the ordinary way, without any<br />

expanding other than that produced by the apparatus. Figure 1 shows one of these<br />

tubes as it appears in section, the cut being one-half the original size. (It should be<br />

stated that f-inch plate is thinner than is ordinarily used for boilers of usual dimensions,<br />

and that thicker heads would give more frictional surface, and consequently more hold-<br />

ing power.) <strong>The</strong>se specimens were delivered to Prof. Charles B. Richards, then consulting<br />

engineer at Colt's Armory in this city, with the request that he would subject them<br />

to the required test. In his report Mr. Richards says: "<strong>The</strong> external diameter of the<br />

tubes was three inches, and the thickness .109 of an inch. One end of each tube was-<br />

fasteued in an iron plate 6 inches square, being simply expanded into the plate without

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!