The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
132 THE LOCOMOTIVE. [September,.<br />
iug in use for a sufficient length of time. Certain facts observed by Mr. Nicholls in<br />
connection with the heads described above indicate, however, that this is not the case.<br />
For instance, in the third experiment, when the pressure reached 10 lbs. the end had<br />
bulged -^^ of an inch; at 20 lbs., it had bulged jig inch; at 40 lbs., ^ inch; at 60 lbs.,<br />
T^g inch; at 80 lbs., ^ inch; at 100 lbs., ^ inch; at 120 lbs., | inch; at 140 lbs., ^ inch;<br />
at 155 lbs., -/g inch; at 170 lbs., | inch; at 185 lbs., ii inch; at 200 lbs., the bulge-A\-as.<br />
exactly | of an inch. "<strong>The</strong> pressure was now reduced to zero," says Mr. Nicholls,<br />
" and the end sjjrang back ^^ inch, leaving it with a permanent set of -f^ inch. <strong>The</strong><br />
pressure of 200 pounds was again applied on 36 separate occasions during an interval of<br />
five days, the bulging and permanent set being noted on each occasion, but without any<br />
appreciable difference from that noted above." That is, as we understand it, no<br />
tendency to increase in the set could be detected.<br />
It must be remarked, however, that the experiments we have described were con-<br />
fined to plates not very widely diff'erent in their dimensions, so that even Mr. Nicholls'<br />
rule cannot be relied upon for heads that depart very much from the proportions given<br />
in the example above.<br />
It will be seen that, considering the discrepancy in the various rules, and the insufiiciency<br />
of the data available, our knowledge<br />
of the strength of flat unstayed heads is<br />
very meager; and the moral is, as in all other<br />
such cases in engineering practice, that<br />
we should avoid such heads whenever it is<br />
possible to do so, and should use in the place<br />
of them something that we know more about.<br />
Bumped up heads are therefore recommended<br />
'<br />
in cases where braces cannot be used. ^ 'i \ v_J<br />
Fig. 4. Fig. 5.<br />
In horizontal tubular boilers a considerable part of the head is held by the tubes;<br />
and as it is of the highest importance to know to what extent we can rely upon the<br />
holding power of tubes, numerous experiments have been made, with tubes set in various-<br />
ways, to determine this point. In 1880 we instituted two series of tests on tubes rolled<br />
with the Dudgeon expander, as there was some question among engineers, at that time,<br />
about the effectiveness of this tool. We arranged with Messrs. H. B. Beach & Son,<br />
boiler-makers in this city, to prepare for us three specimens composed of tubes three-<br />
inches in external diameter, rolled into f-inch plate in the ordinary way, without any<br />
expanding other than that produced by the apparatus. Figure 1 shows one of these<br />
tubes as it appears in section, the cut being one-half the original size. (It should be<br />
stated that f-inch plate is thinner than is ordinarily used for boilers of usual dimensions,<br />
and that thicker heads would give more frictional surface, and consequently more hold-<br />
ing power.) <strong>The</strong>se specimens were delivered to Prof. Charles B. Richards, then consulting<br />
engineer at Colt's Armory in this city, with the request that he would subject them<br />
to the required test. In his report Mr. Richards says: "<strong>The</strong> external diameter of the<br />
tubes was three inches, and the thickness .109 of an inch. One end of each tube was-<br />
fasteued in an iron plate 6 inches square, being simply expanded into the plate without