27.02.2013 Views

The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog

The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog

The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ib'jj.j T HE L U C O M O T 1 V E 175<br />

conduct of mutual insuiuuco compaiiics lias also Ijccii invt'sti|i;atc'(l. In one case in which<br />

a tug boiler had been insured with one of these companies the Court commented on tin-<br />

fact that a report of survey was made by directors of the association in which they<br />

described the boiler as in good condition witliout having nuule any examination of it.<br />

In another case an insurance comj)any or its responsiI>le officer was found to blame for<br />

not discontinuing a policy after the failure by the owner to repair defects pointed out<br />

on the examination of the boiler. In four cases inspectors of companies have been found<br />

to blame for defective examinations.<br />

"<strong>The</strong> Commissioners have also animadverted on the conduct of boiler maker.s,<br />

boiler vendors, Ijoiler repairers, and engineers having the management of boilers, as well<br />

as upon the conduct of owners. In two cases the vendors of boilers were found to blame<br />

for misleading the purchasers as to the condition of the boilers. In one case the maker<br />

of a boiler was found to blame. In four cases boiler repairers were found to blame.<br />

Skippers of vessels have been found to blame in two cases. In one case the agent of a<br />

colliery was exonerated from ))ersonal blame, but as representing the owners he was held<br />

responsible for the negligent acts of their servants, and he was ordered to pay $oOO<br />

towards costs. <strong>The</strong> Board were advised, however, that in the circumstances the amount<br />

could not be recovered against the agent. In twelve cases engineers and managers in<br />

the employment of the owners have been found to blame, and in one case a consulting<br />

engineer was found to blame.<br />

"If the number of boiler explosions be not regarded as excessive in comparison<br />

with the very large number of boilers in use in the United Kingdom, these investigations<br />

confirm the conclusions already generally accepted, that explosions are very seldom the<br />

result of accident, but that the great majority of them are clearly preventable, and that<br />

periodical inspection by skilled persons, coupled however with an obligation to repair<br />

the discovered defects, is by far the most effectual means of prevention. It may further<br />

be deduced that to the extent that the insurance of boilers leads to their examination by<br />

competent persons, it operates as a preventive."<br />

In conclusion w'e may quote the following table from appendix C of this interesting<br />

report. It gives the number of boiler explosions in Great Britain since the passing of<br />

the first boiler explosions act, in 1883, together with the number of lives lost. As we<br />

understand it, the "year" given in the table ends on June 30; so that, for instance,<br />

" 1882-83" means "from June 30, 1883, to June 30, 1883."<br />

Yeak.<br />

Boiler Explosions in Great Britain since 1882.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!