The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ib'jj.j T HE L U C O M O T 1 V E 175<br />
conduct of mutual insuiuuco compaiiics lias also Ijccii invt'sti|i;atc'(l. In one case in which<br />
a tug boiler had been insured with one of these companies the Court commented on tin-<br />
fact that a report of survey was made by directors of the association in which they<br />
described the boiler as in good condition witliout having nuule any examination of it.<br />
In another case an insurance comj)any or its responsiI>le officer was found to blame for<br />
not discontinuing a policy after the failure by the owner to repair defects pointed out<br />
on the examination of the boiler. In four cases inspectors of companies have been found<br />
to blame for defective examinations.<br />
"<strong>The</strong> Commissioners have also animadverted on the conduct of boiler maker.s,<br />
boiler vendors, Ijoiler repairers, and engineers having the management of boilers, as well<br />
as upon the conduct of owners. In two cases the vendors of boilers were found to blame<br />
for misleading the purchasers as to the condition of the boilers. In one case the maker<br />
of a boiler was found to blame. In four cases boiler repairers were found to blame.<br />
Skippers of vessels have been found to blame in two cases. In one case the agent of a<br />
colliery was exonerated from ))ersonal blame, but as representing the owners he was held<br />
responsible for the negligent acts of their servants, and he was ordered to pay $oOO<br />
towards costs. <strong>The</strong> Board were advised, however, that in the circumstances the amount<br />
could not be recovered against the agent. In twelve cases engineers and managers in<br />
the employment of the owners have been found to blame, and in one case a consulting<br />
engineer was found to blame.<br />
"If the number of boiler explosions be not regarded as excessive in comparison<br />
with the very large number of boilers in use in the United Kingdom, these investigations<br />
confirm the conclusions already generally accepted, that explosions are very seldom the<br />
result of accident, but that the great majority of them are clearly preventable, and that<br />
periodical inspection by skilled persons, coupled however with an obligation to repair<br />
the discovered defects, is by far the most effectual means of prevention. It may further<br />
be deduced that to the extent that the insurance of boilers leads to their examination by<br />
competent persons, it operates as a preventive."<br />
In conclusion w'e may quote the following table from appendix C of this interesting<br />
report. It gives the number of boiler explosions in Great Britain since the passing of<br />
the first boiler explosions act, in 1883, together with the number of lives lost. As we<br />
understand it, the "year" given in the table ends on June 30; so that, for instance,<br />
" 1882-83" means "from June 30, 1883, to June 30, 1883."<br />
Yeak.<br />
Boiler Explosions in Great Britain since 1882.