27.02.2013 Views

The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog

The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog

The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

174 THE LOCOMOTIVE. [:November,<br />

selves of responsibility for their safe working condition upon the ground that the insur-<br />

ance of their boilers is to them a guarantee of safety; but the Commissioners have<br />

uniformly refused to accept a \i\ea of this kind, and have laid it down that the responsi-<br />

bility for the condition of a boiler rests upon the owner or user, and not upon the insur-<br />

ance companies, and that in ])oint of law they [the insurance companies] are at perfect<br />

liberty to insure a boiler which is entirely worn out, if they choose to take the risk.~ On<br />

the other hand the Commissioners have impressed upon the companies the consideration<br />

that, having regard to the safety of life, the insurance of a boiler ought always to be<br />

based upon a thorough examination. [It may be said, parenthetically, that in this<br />

country, where the liability of the boiler insurance company frequently runs up to<br />

$40,000 or $50,000, it would hardly be necessary for the Commissioners to 'advise' any<br />

reputable company to make a thorough inspection of the boiler before insuring it ! In<br />

England, we believe, the liability of the insurance company is always quite small; and<br />

in that case a not very scrupulous companj' might sometimes be tempted to gamble on<br />

the chance of explosion. Hence the wisdom of the Commissioners' admonition. Ed.]<br />

Decisions in these terms have been publicly delivered upon several occasions, but it is<br />

due to the companies to add that while in some few cases policies have been issued<br />

before a thorough examination has taken place, they do not in practice take extreme<br />

risks; and further, that they are usually found to make reasonable efforts to examine a<br />

boiler before it is covered by insurance. <strong>The</strong> whole question of insurance of boilers,<br />

like that of marine insurance, undoubtedly involves many and complicated considerations.<br />

It is sufficient for the present purpose to say that these investigations prove that insur-<br />

ance operates as a preventive of explosions in spite of certain difficulties. <strong>The</strong> companies<br />

provide for ' working examinations,' and 'thorough examinations,' and they occasionally<br />

insure boilers after a working examination, in expectation of obtaining an opportunity<br />

for a thorough examination within a reasonable time. <strong>The</strong> insurance usually covers a<br />

period of twelve months, and although efforts are made to obtain a thorough examination<br />

before its expiration, it is frequently inconvenient to the owner to stop the working<br />

of his boiler for the purpose, and consequently no such examination takes j^lace. In the<br />

absence of a report of a thorough examination within the twelve months many of the<br />

companies would refuse to renew the policy, and a reckless owner may then transfer<br />

his risk to another company, and the same result may follow in the succeeding year.<br />

This is no doubt done in certain cases, but, so iar as can be ascertained, in only a very<br />

few. Insurance of this kind is of course worse than useless as a preventive of explosions.<br />

Again, it is found that many steam users do not, so to speak, rush after insurance. On<br />

the contrary, in outlying districts it is frequently only by considerable persuasion on the<br />

part of the insurance company's agent that the owner is induced to insure his boiler at<br />

all, and in the absence of insurance or compulsory examination it is kept working by<br />

the owner in ignorance of its condition until it leaks or explodes. <strong>The</strong> culpable reckless-<br />

ness of some owners is occasionally displayed in another form. In two cases it has trans-<br />

pired that proposals for insurance having been refused on account of the condition of<br />

the boiler by one company, the owner obtained insurance with another company, con-<br />

cealing the fact of the previous refusal. This conduct was of course condemned by the<br />

Commissioners in severe terms. <strong>The</strong> mere fact of making insurance companies and<br />

their inspectors parties to these investigations when necessary has had, and will, I think,<br />

continue to have, a beneficial effect in making the companies more careful in accepting<br />

proposals for insurance, in inducing them to employ competent and thoroughly trained<br />

inspectors, and in making those inspectors extremely careful in their examinations. <strong>The</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!