26.03.2013 Views

MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences - Cryptome

MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences - Cryptome

MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences - Cryptome

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

organism (or system) is equivalent to <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> being a<br />

state <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> organism (or system) that plays a certain causal<br />

role R. It is claimed that <strong>the</strong> states that answer to <strong>the</strong> functional<br />

concepts in question are invariably physical states, but<br />

which physical states <strong>the</strong>y are may vary from species to species,<br />

or even within a species, perhaps even within a given<br />

individual at different times.<br />

Concerns about type epiphenomenalism remain, however.<br />

We type intentional mental states not only by <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

intentional mode (e.g., belief, desire, intention), but also by<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir content (by what is believed, what is desired, or what is<br />

intended). According to externalist <strong>the</strong>ories <strong>of</strong> content, <strong>the</strong><br />

content <strong>of</strong> a mental state can fail to supervene on intrinsic<br />

physical states <strong>of</strong> its occupant (Putnam 1975b; Burge 1979).<br />

Two intrinsic physical duplicates could have mental states<br />

(e.g., beliefs) with different contents. Thus intentional state<br />

types seem to involve contextual, environmental factors.<br />

The concern is that <strong>the</strong> contextual, environmental component<br />

<strong>of</strong> content is causally irrelevant to behavior. This is a<br />

problem in that <strong>the</strong> contents <strong>of</strong> beliefs and desires figure<br />

essentially in belief-desire explanations <strong>of</strong> behavior. The<br />

problem is exacerbated by <strong>the</strong> fact that on some externalist<br />

<strong>the</strong>ories, content depends on historical context (Dretske<br />

1988), and that on some it can depend on social context<br />

(Burge 1979).<br />

A concern also remains about whe<strong>the</strong>r qualitative mental<br />

states (states that have a subjective experiential aspect) are<br />

epiphenomena. Our concepts <strong>of</strong> sensory states—e.g., aches,<br />

pains, itches, and <strong>the</strong> like—are arguably not functional concepts<br />

in ei<strong>the</strong>r sense <strong>of</strong> functional concepts (Hill 1991). This<br />

has led some philosophers to embrace token dualism for<br />

such states and to maintain both type and token epiphenomenalism<br />

for <strong>the</strong>m (Jackson 1982; Chalmers 1996). In rejection<br />

<strong>of</strong> epiphenomenalism for qualitative states, some<br />

philosophers argue that sensory concepts are equivalent to<br />

functional concepts (White 1991). And some argue that<br />

although sensory concepts are not equivalent to functional<br />

concepts or physical concepts, none<strong>the</strong>less, sensory properties<br />

are identical with neural properties (Hill 1991).<br />

Whe<strong>the</strong>r PHYSICALISM is true for sensory states raises <strong>the</strong><br />

mind-body problem in perhaps its toughest form. That a<br />

nagging headache can cause one to be in a bad mood and<br />

that an itch can cause one to scratch seem to be as intuitive<br />

cases <strong>of</strong> mental causation as one can find. But how, and<br />

indeed even whe<strong>the</strong>r, a qualitative aspect <strong>of</strong> a mental state<br />

(e.g., <strong>the</strong> achiness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> headache) can be causally relevant<br />

remains an issue <strong>of</strong> intense debate.<br />

See also INDIVIDUALISM; MENTAL CAUSATION; MENTAL<br />

REPRESENTATION; NARROW CONTENT<br />

—Brian P. McLaughlin<br />

References<br />

Armstrong, D. M. (1968). A Materialist Theory <strong>of</strong> Mind. London:<br />

Routledge and Kegan Paul.<br />

Block, N. (1990). Can <strong>the</strong> mind change <strong>the</strong> world? In G. Boolos,<br />

Ed., Meaning and Method: Essays in Honor <strong>of</strong> Hilary Putnam.<br />

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />

Broad, C. D. (1925). The Mind and Its Place in Nature. London:<br />

Routledge and Kegan Paul.<br />

Epiphenomenalism 277<br />

Burge, T. (1979). Individualism and <strong>the</strong> mental. Midwest Studies in<br />

Philosophy 4: 73–121.<br />

Caston, V. (1997). Epiphenomenalisms, ancient and modern.<br />

Philosophical Review 106.<br />

Chalmers, D. (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search <strong>of</strong> a Theory<br />

<strong>of</strong> Conscious Experience. New York: Oxford University Press.<br />

Davidson, D. (1970). Mental events. In L. Foster and J. W. Swanson,<br />

Eds., Experience and Theory. Amherst: University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts<br />

Press.<br />

Davidson, D. (1993). Thinking causes. In J. Heil and A. Mele,<br />

Eds., Mental Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<br />

Dretske, F. (1988). Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World <strong>of</strong><br />

Causes. Cambridge, MA: <strong>MIT</strong> Press/Bradford Books.<br />

Heil, J., and A. Mele, Eds. (1993). Mental Causation. Oxford:<br />

Oxford University Press.<br />

Hill, C. (1991). Sensations: A Defense <strong>of</strong> Type Materialism. Cambridge:<br />

Cambridge University Press.<br />

Hodgson, S. H. (1870). The Theory <strong>of</strong> Practice: An Ethical<br />

Enquiry. 2 vols. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer.<br />

Horgan, T. (1989). Mental quasation. Philosophical Perspectives 3:<br />

47–76.<br />

Huxley, T. H. (1874/1901). On <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis that animals are<br />

automata, and its history. Reprinted in T. H. Huxley, Method<br />

and Results. Collected Essays, vol. 1. New York: D. Appleton<br />

and Company.<br />

Jackson, F. (1982). Epiphenomenal qualia. Philosophical Quarterly<br />

32: 127–136.<br />

Lepore, E., and B. Loewer. (1987). Mind matters. Journal <strong>of</strong> Philosophy<br />

84: 630–642.<br />

Lewis, D. (1980). Mad pain and martian pain. In N. Block, Ed.,<br />

Readings in <strong>the</strong> Philosophy <strong>of</strong> Psychology, vol. 1. Cambridge,<br />

MA: Harvard University Press.<br />

Loar, B. (1981). Mind and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University<br />

Press.<br />

McLaughlin, B. P. (1989). Type dualism, type epiphenomenalism,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> causal priority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> physical. Philosophical Perspectives<br />

3: 109–135.<br />

McLaughlin, B. P. (1993). On Davidson’s response to <strong>the</strong> charge <strong>of</strong><br />

epiphenomenalism. In Heil, J., and A. Mele, Eds., Mental Causation.<br />

Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27–40.<br />

McLaughlin, B. P. (1994). Epiphenomenalism. In S. Guttenplan,<br />

Ed., A Companion to <strong>the</strong> Philosophy <strong>of</strong> Mind. Oxford: Blackwell,<br />

pp. 277–288<br />

McLaughlin, B. P. (1995). Mental causation. In <strong>Encyclopedia</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Philosophy, Supplementary Volume. London: Routledge and<br />

Kegan Paul.<br />

Putnam, H. (1975a). Philosophy and our mental life. In H. Putnam,<br />

Ed., Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University<br />

Press.<br />

Putnam, H. (1975b). The meaning <strong>of</strong> “meaning.” In H. Putnam,<br />

Ed., Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University<br />

Press.<br />

Sosa, E. (1984). Mind-body interaction and supervenient causation.<br />

Midwest Studies in Philosophy 9: 271–281.<br />

Ward, J. (1896–98/1903). The Conscious Automaton Theory. Lecture<br />

XII <strong>of</strong> Naturalism or Agnosticism, vol. 2. London: Adam<br />

and Charles Black, pp. 34–64.<br />

White, S. L. (1991). The Unity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Self. Cambridge, MA: <strong>MIT</strong>/<br />

Bradford Books.<br />

Yablo, S. (1992a). Mental causation. Philosophical Review 101:<br />

245–280.<br />

Yablo, S. (1992b). Cause and essence. Syn<strong>the</strong>se 93: 403–499.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r Readings<br />

Fodor, J. A. (1987). Psychosemantics. Cambridge, MA: <strong>MIT</strong> Press.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!