26.03.2013 Views

MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences - Cryptome

MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences - Cryptome

MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences - Cryptome

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

840 Theory <strong>of</strong> Mind<br />

argued for a “simulation” <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> many <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> mind<br />

developments. On this view advances in <strong>the</strong> child’s understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mind reflect an increasing ability to simulate<br />

or imagine <strong>the</strong> experiences <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs. Dunn suggests that<br />

socialization and social interaction may play a crucial role in<br />

children’s development <strong>of</strong> a <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> mind (Dunn et al.<br />

1991). In support <strong>of</strong> this view, <strong>the</strong>re is evidence that younger<br />

siblings have a more advanced <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> mind than older<br />

siblings (Perner, Ruffman, and Leekam 1994) and that parent’s<br />

conversations about mental states influence children’s<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mind (Dunn et al. 1991). Probably <strong>the</strong><br />

most widely held view, however, is what has been called<br />

“<strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>the</strong>ory” (Perner 1991; Wellman 1990; Gopnik<br />

1993; Flavell, Green, and Flavell 1995). Originally advanced<br />

in philosophy (see SIMULATION VS. THEORY-THEORY) this<br />

view also is part <strong>of</strong> a more general <strong>the</strong>oretical approach that<br />

explains children’s COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT by analogy to<br />

scientific <strong>the</strong>ory change (Carey 1985; Gopnik and Meltz<strong>of</strong>f<br />

1997; Wellman 1990). On this view children develop a succession<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ories <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mind that <strong>the</strong>y use to explain <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

experience and <strong>the</strong> behavior <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>mselves and o<strong>the</strong>rs. Like<br />

scientific <strong>the</strong>ories, <strong>the</strong>se intuitive or naive <strong>the</strong>ories postulate<br />

abstract coherent mental entities and laws, and <strong>the</strong>y provide<br />

predictions, interpretations, and explanations. The <strong>the</strong>ories<br />

change as children confront counterevidence, ga<strong>the</strong>r new<br />

data, and perform experiments. One consequence <strong>of</strong> this<br />

view is that <strong>the</strong> philosophical doctrine <strong>of</strong> first-person authority<br />

is incorrect; our knowledge <strong>of</strong> our minds is as <strong>the</strong>oretical<br />

as our knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> minds <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs. More broadly, <strong>the</strong><br />

recent research suggests that empirical evidence from developmental<br />

psychology may be brought to bear on classic<br />

problems in <strong>the</strong> philosophy <strong>of</strong> mind.<br />

See also CONCEPTUAL CHANGE; MACHIAVELLIAN INTELLI-<br />

GENCE HYPOTHESIS; NATIVISM; PROPOSITIONAL ATTITUDES<br />

—Alison Gopnik<br />

References and Fur<strong>the</strong>r Readings<br />

Astington, P., L. Harris, and D. R. Olson, Eds. (1988). Developing<br />

Theories <strong>of</strong> Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />

Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness. Cambridge, MA: <strong>MIT</strong><br />

Press.<br />

Bartsch, K., and H. M. Wellman. (1989). Young children’s attribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> action to beliefs and desires. Child Development 60(4):<br />

946–964.<br />

Bartsch, K., and H. M. Wellman. (1995). Children Talk about <strong>the</strong><br />

Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.<br />

Butterworth, G. (1991). The ontogeny and phylogeny <strong>of</strong> joint<br />

visual attention. In A. Whiten, Ed., Natural Theories <strong>of</strong> Mind:<br />

Evolution, Development and Simulation <strong>of</strong> Everyday Mindreading.<br />

Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 223–232.<br />

Byrne, R., and A. Whiten, Eds. (1988). Machiavellian Intelligence:<br />

Social Expertise and <strong>the</strong> Evolution <strong>of</strong> Intellect in Monkeys,<br />

Apes and Humans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<br />

Campos, J. J., and C. R. Sternberg. (1980). Perception, appraisal<br />

and emotion: The onset <strong>of</strong> social referencing. In M. Lamb and<br />

L. Sherrod, Eds., Infant Social Cognition. Mahwah, NJ:<br />

Erlbaum, pp. 273–311.<br />

Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cambridge,<br />

MA: <strong>MIT</strong> Press.<br />

Carru<strong>the</strong>rs, P., and P. Smith, Eds. (1995). Theories <strong>of</strong> Theory <strong>of</strong><br />

Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />

Chandler, M. J., and D. Helm. (1984). Developmental changes in<br />

<strong>the</strong> contribution <strong>of</strong> shared experience to social role-taking competence.<br />

International Journal <strong>of</strong> Behavioral Development 7:<br />

145–156.<br />

Clements, W., and J. Perner. (1994). Implicit understanding <strong>of</strong><br />

belief. <strong>Cognitive</strong> Development 9: 377–395.<br />

Dunn, J., J. Brown, C. Slomkowski, C. Tesla, and L. Youngblade.<br />

(1991). Young children’s understanding <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r people’s feelings<br />

and beliefs: Individual differences and <strong>the</strong>ir antecedents.<br />

Child Development 62: 1352–1366.<br />

Flavell, J. H., E. R. Flavell, F. L. Green, and L. J. Moses. (1990).<br />

Young children’s understanding <strong>of</strong> fact beliefs versus value<br />

beliefs. Child Development 61(4): 915–928.<br />

Flavell, J. H., F. L. Green, and E. R. Flavell. (1986). Development<br />

<strong>of</strong> knowledge about <strong>the</strong> appearance-reality distinction. Monographs<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Society for Research in Child Development 51,<br />

no. 1.<br />

Flavell, J. H., F. L. Green, and E. R. Flavell. (1995). Young children’s<br />

knowledge about thinking. Monographs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Society<br />

for Research in Child Development, serial no. 243.<br />

Gopnik, A. (1993). How we know our minds: The illusion <strong>of</strong> firstperson<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> intentionality. Behavioral and Brain <strong>Sciences</strong><br />

16: 1–14.<br />

Gopnik, A., and J. W. Astington. (1988). Children’s understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> representational change and its relation to <strong>the</strong> understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> false belief and <strong>the</strong> appearance-reality distinction. Child<br />

Development 59: 26–37.<br />

Gopnik, A., and A. N. Meltz<strong>of</strong>f. (1997). Words, Thoughts and Theories.<br />

Cambridge, MA: <strong>MIT</strong> Press.<br />

Gopnik, A., A. N. Meltz<strong>of</strong>f, and V. Slaughter. (1994). Changing<br />

your views: How understanding visual perception can lead to a<br />

new <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mind. In C. Lewis and P. Mitchell, Eds., Origins<br />

<strong>of</strong> a Theory <strong>of</strong> Mind. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.<br />

Harris, P. L. (1989). Children and Emotion. Oxford: Blackwell.<br />

Harris, P. L. (1991). The work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> imagination. In A. Whiten,<br />

Ed., Natural Theories <strong>of</strong> Mind: The Evolution, Development<br />

and Simulation <strong>of</strong> Second-Order Mental Representations.<br />

Oxford: Blackwell.<br />

Harris, P. L., and R. Kavanaugh. (1993). Young children’s understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> pretense. Monographs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Society for Research<br />

in Child Development 58: 1.<br />

Leslie, A. M. (1994). ToMM, To By, and agency: Core architecture<br />

and domain specificity. In L. Hirschfield and S. Gelman, Eds.,<br />

Mapping <strong>the</strong> mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture.<br />

New York: Cambridge University Press.<br />

Masangkay, Z., K. McCluskey, C. McIntyre, J. Sims-Knight, B.<br />

Vaughan, and J. H. Flavell. (1974). The early development <strong>of</strong><br />

inferences about <strong>the</strong> visual percepts <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs. Child Development<br />

45: 357–366.<br />

Meltz<strong>of</strong>f, A. N., and A. Gopnik. (1993). The role <strong>of</strong> imitation in<br />

understanding persons and developing a <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> mind. In S.<br />

Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, and D. Cohen, Eds., Understanding<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Minds: Perspectives from Autism. Oxford:<br />

Oxford University Press, pp. 335–366.<br />

Meltz<strong>of</strong>f, A. N., and M. K. Moore. (1977). Imitation <strong>of</strong> facial and<br />

manual gestures by human neonates. Science 198: 75–78.<br />

Mitchell, P., and H. Lacohee. (1991). Children’s early understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> false belief. Cognition 39(2).<br />

Moses, L. J. (1993). Young children’s understanding <strong>of</strong> belief constraints<br />

on intention. <strong>Cognitive</strong> Development, pp. 1–27.<br />

Nisbett, R., and L. Ross. (1980). Human Inference: Strategies and<br />

Shortcomings <strong>of</strong> Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.<br />

O’Neill, D. K., and A. Gopnik. (1991). Young children’s ability to<br />

identify <strong>the</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir beliefs. Developmental Psychology<br />

27: 390–397.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!