29.03.2013 Views

Rousseau and Revolution

Rousseau and Revolution

Rousseau and Revolution

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Reverse <strong>Revolution</strong> 97<br />

teach man the fi rst words of the fi rst language, to teach man the alphabet’ (cited<br />

in Roussel, 1972, 29).<br />

4 In a different book on the French <strong>Revolution</strong>, Quinet reiterates the same idea, ‘In<br />

an edifi ed Catholic France, unprepared for liberty, we see the <strong>Revolution</strong> partially<br />

keep, at fi rst, the exclusive temperament of the Church it replaced’ (Quinet, 1845,<br />

351).<br />

5 Writing shortly after the Reign of Terror, Volney tries to draw a connection between<br />

the violent upheaval of the revolution <strong>and</strong> the fanatical embrace of <strong>Rousseau</strong>’s<br />

ideas.<br />

6 During the French <strong>Revolution</strong>, the Civic Certifi cates were mainly delivered to public<br />

offi cials <strong>and</strong> attested to their patriotism. They were used to brush away any<br />

accusations of treachery.<br />

7 The republicanism professed by the legislators of the revolution leads to many<br />

comparisons with Numa <strong>and</strong> Lycurgus. In Leçons d’Histoire, Volney (1800, 181)<br />

emphasizes the religious dimension of the new devotion for Greek or Roman<br />

myths, ‘Having emancipated ourselves from the Jewish fanaticism, let us now<br />

repress that V<strong>and</strong>al or Roman fanaticism, which, under political denominations,<br />

would lead us back to all the fury of religious contests’.<br />

8 Regarding the general question of what the eighteenth century read <strong>and</strong> how it<br />

read, see Mornet, 1989; Darnton, 1995; Swenson, 2000, 16–31. Regarding the publication<br />

of the Social Contract in post-revolutionary France see Palmer, 1959,<br />

19–27.<br />

9 In Édition <strong>and</strong> sédition, Robert Darnton writes (1991, 174), ‘Research tends to confi<br />

rm Daniel Mornet’s old discovery, that even if the Contrat social was the “bible” of<br />

the French <strong>Revolution</strong>, this work was very little known in pre-revolutionary<br />

France’.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!