A History of English Literature
A History of English Literature
A History of English Literature
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
in Parliament to his only son, whose death soon followed to prostrate him;<br />
and the successes <strong>of</strong> the French plunged him into feverish anxiety. After<br />
again pouring out a flood <strong>of</strong> passionate eloquence in four letters entitled<br />
'Thoughts on the Prospect <strong>of</strong> a Regicide Peace' (with France) he died in<br />
1797.<br />
We have already indicated many <strong>of</strong> the sources <strong>of</strong> Burke's power as a speaker<br />
and writer, but others remain to be mentioned. Not least important are his<br />
faculties <strong>of</strong> logical arrangement and lucid statement. He was the first<br />
<strong>English</strong>man to exemplify with supreme skill all the technical devices <strong>of</strong><br />
exposition and argument--a very careful ordering <strong>of</strong> ideas according to a<br />
plan made clear, but not too conspicuous, to the hearer or reader; the use<br />
<strong>of</strong> summaries, topic sentences, connectives; and all the others. In style he<br />
had made himself an instinctive master <strong>of</strong> rhythmical balance, with<br />
something, as contrasted with nineteenth century writing, <strong>of</strong> eighteenth<br />
century formality. Yet he is much more varied, flexible, and fluent than<br />
Johnson or Gibbon, with much greater variety <strong>of</strong> sentence forms and with far<br />
more color, figurativeness and picturesqueness <strong>of</strong> phrase. In his most<br />
eloquent and sympathetic passages he is a thorough poet, splendidly<br />
imaginative and dramatic. J. R. Greene in his '<strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> England' has well<br />
spoken <strong>of</strong> 'the characteristics <strong>of</strong> his oratory--its passionate ardor, its<br />
poetic fancy, its amazing prodigality <strong>of</strong> resources; the dazzling succession<br />
in which irony, pathos, invective, tenderness, the most brilliant word<br />
pictures, the coolest argument, followed each other.' Fundamental, lastly,<br />
in Burke's power, is his philosophic insight, his faculty <strong>of</strong> correlating<br />
facts and penetrating below this surface, <strong>of</strong> viewing events in the light <strong>of</strong><br />
their abstract principles, their causes and their inevitable results.<br />
In spite <strong>of</strong> all this, in the majority <strong>of</strong> cases Burke was not a successful<br />
speaker. The overwhelming logic and feeling <strong>of</strong> his speech 'On the Nabob <strong>of</strong><br />
Arcot's Debts' produced so little effect at its delivery that the ministers<br />
against whom it was directed did not even think necessary to answer it. One<br />
<strong>of</strong> Burke's contemporaries has recorded that he left the Parliament house<br />
(crawling under the benches to avoid Burke's notice) in order to escape<br />
hearing one <strong>of</strong> his speeches which when it was published he read with the<br />
most intense interest. In the latter part <strong>of</strong> his life Burke was even called<br />
'the dinner-bell <strong>of</strong> the House' because his rising to speak was a signal for<br />
a general exodus <strong>of</strong> the other members. The reasons for this seeming paradox<br />
are apparently to be sought in something deeper than the mere prejudice <strong>of</strong><br />
Burke's opponents. He was prolix, but, chiefly, he was undignified in<br />
appearance and manner and lacked a good delivery. It was only when the<br />
sympathy or interest <strong>of</strong> his hearers enabled them to forget these things<br />
that they were swept away by the force <strong>of</strong> his reason or the contagion <strong>of</strong><br />
his wit or his emotion. On such occasions, as in his first speech in the<br />
impeachment <strong>of</strong> Hastings, he was irresistible.<br />
From what has now been said it must be evident that while Burke's<br />
temperament and mind were truly classical in some <strong>of</strong> their qualities, as in<br />
his devotion to order and established institutions, and in the clearness <strong>of</strong><br />
his thought and style, and while in both spirit and style he manifests a<br />
regard for decorum and formality which connects him with the<br />
pseudo-classicists, nevertheless he shared to at least as great a degree in<br />
those qualities <strong>of</strong> emotion and enthusiasm which the pseudo-classic writers<br />
generally lacked and which were to distinguish the romantic writers <strong>of</strong> the<br />
nineteenth century. How the romantic movement had begun, long before Burke<br />
came to maturity, and how it had made its way even in the midst <strong>of</strong> the<br />
pseudo-classical period, we may now consider.<br />
THE ROMANTIC MOVEMENT. The reaction which was bound to accompany the