A History of English Literature
A History of English Literature
A History of English Literature
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
many <strong>of</strong> the characters suggest at the outset. Indeed Dickens has been<br />
rightly designated a grotesque novelist--the greatest <strong>of</strong> all grotesque<br />
novelists. Similarly his pathos is <strong>of</strong>ten exaggerated until it passes into<br />
mawkish sentimentality, so that his humbly-bred heroines, for example, are<br />
made to act and talk with all the poise and certainty which can really<br />
spring only from wide experience and broad education. Dickens' zeal for<br />
reform, also, sometimes outruns his judgment or knowledge and leads him to<br />
assault evils that had actually been abolished long before he wrote.<br />
No other <strong>English</strong> author has approached Dickens in the number <strong>of</strong> characters<br />
whom he has created; his twenty novels present literally thousands <strong>of</strong><br />
persons, almost all thoroughly human, except for the limitations that we<br />
have already noted. Their range is <strong>of</strong> course very great, though it never<br />
extends successfully into the 'upper' social classes. For Dickens was<br />
violently prejudiced against the nobility and against all persons <strong>of</strong> high<br />
social standing, and when he attempted to introduce them created only<br />
pitifully wooden automatons. For the actual <strong>English</strong> gentleman we must pass<br />
by his Sir Leicester Dedlocks and his Mr. Veneerings to novelists <strong>of</strong> a very<br />
different viewpoint, such as Thackeray and Meredith.<br />
Dickens' inexhaustible fertility in characters and scenes is a main cause<br />
<strong>of</strong> the rather extravagant lack <strong>of</strong> unity which is another conspicuous<br />
feature <strong>of</strong> his books. He usually made a good preliminary general plan and<br />
proceeded on the whole with firm movement and strong suspense. But he<br />
always introduces many characters and sub-actions not necessary to the main<br />
story, and develops them quite beyond their real artistic importance. Not<br />
without influence here was the necessity <strong>of</strong> filling a specified number <strong>of</strong><br />
serial instalments, each <strong>of</strong> a definite number <strong>of</strong> pages, and each requiring<br />
a striking situation at the end. Moreover, Dickens <strong>of</strong>ten follows the<br />
eighteenth-century picaresque habit <strong>of</strong> tracing the histories <strong>of</strong> his heroes<br />
from birth to marriage. In most respects, however, Dickens' art improved as<br />
he proceeded. The love element, it should be noted, as what we have already<br />
said implies, plays a smaller part than usual among the various aspects <strong>of</strong><br />
life which his books present.<br />
Not least striking among Dickens' traits is his power <strong>of</strong> description. His<br />
observation is very quick and keen, though not fine; his sense for the<br />
characteristic features, whether <strong>of</strong> scenes in Nature or <strong>of</strong> human<br />
personality and appearance, is unerring; and he has never had a superior in<br />
picturing and conveying the atmosphere both <strong>of</strong> interiors and <strong>of</strong> all kinds<br />
<strong>of</strong> scenes <strong>of</strong> human life. London, where most <strong>of</strong> his novels are wholly or<br />
chiefly located, has in him its chief and most comprehensive portrayer.<br />
Worthy <strong>of</strong> special praise, lastly, is the moral soundness <strong>of</strong> all Dickens'<br />
work, praise which is not seriously affected by present-day sneers at his<br />
'middle-class' and 'mid-Victorian' point <strong>of</strong> view. Dickens' books, however,<br />
like his character, are destitute <strong>of</strong> the deeper spiritual quality, <strong>of</strong><br />
poetic and philosophic idealism. His stories are all admirable<br />
demonstrations <strong>of</strong> the power and beauty <strong>of</strong> the nobler practical virtues, <strong>of</strong><br />
kindness, courage, humility, and all the other forms <strong>of</strong> unselfishness; but<br />
for the underlying mysteries <strong>of</strong> life and the higher meanings <strong>of</strong> art his<br />
positive and self-formed mind had very little feeling. From first to last<br />
he speaks authentically for the common heart <strong>of</strong> humanity, but he is not one<br />
<strong>of</strong> the rarer spirits, like Spenser or George Eliot or Meredith, who<br />
transport us into the realm <strong>of</strong> the less tangible realities. All his<br />
limitations, indeed, have become more conspicuous as time has passed; and<br />
critical judgment has already definitely excluded him from the select ranks<br />
<strong>of</strong> the truly greatest authors.