A History of English Literature
A History of English Literature
A History of English Literature
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
WILLIAM M. THACKERAY. Dickens' chief rival for fame during his later<br />
lifetime and afterward was Thackeray, who presents a strong contrast with<br />
him, both as man and as writer.<br />
Thackeray, the son <strong>of</strong> an East India Company <strong>of</strong>ficial, was born at Calcutta<br />
in 1811. His father died while he was a child and he was taken to England<br />
for his education; he was a student in the Charterhouse School and then for<br />
a year at Cambridge. Next, on the Continent, he studied drawing, and though<br />
his unmethodical and somewhat idle habits prevented him from ever really<br />
mastering the technique <strong>of</strong> the art, his real knack for it enabled him later<br />
on to illustrate his own books in a semi-grotesque but effective fashion.<br />
Desultory study <strong>of</strong> the law was interrupted when he came <strong>of</strong> age by the<br />
inheritance <strong>of</strong> a comfortable fortune, which he managed to lose within a<br />
year or two by gambling, speculations, and an unsuccessful effort at<br />
carrying on a newspaper. Real application to newspaper and magazine writing<br />
secured him after four years a place on 'Eraser's Magazine,' and he was<br />
married. Not long after, his wife became insane, but his warm affection for<br />
his daughters gave him throughout his life genuine domestic happiness.<br />
For ten years Thackeray's production was mainly in the line <strong>of</strong> satirical<br />
humorous and picaresque fiction, none <strong>of</strong> it <strong>of</strong> the first rank. During this<br />
period he chiefly attacked current vices, snobbishness, and sentimentality,<br />
which latter quality, Thackeray's special aversion, he found rampant in<br />
contemporary life and literature, including the novels <strong>of</strong> Dickens. The<br />
appearance <strong>of</strong> his masterpiece, 'Vanity Fair' (the allegorical title taken<br />
from a famous incident in 'Pilgrim's Progress'), in 'Fraser's Magazine' in<br />
1847-8 (the year before Dickens' 'David Copperfield') brought him sudden<br />
fame and made him a social lion. Within the next ten years he produced his<br />
other important novels, <strong>of</strong> which the best are 'Pendennis,' 'Henry Esmond,'<br />
and 'The Newcomes,' and also his charming essays (first delivered as<br />
lectures) on the eighteenth century in England, namely '<strong>English</strong> Humorists,'<br />
and 'The Four Georges.' All his novels except 'Henry Esmond' were published<br />
serially, and he generally delayed composing each instalment until the<br />
latest possible moment, working reluctantly except under the stress <strong>of</strong><br />
immediate compulsion. He was for three years, at its commencement, editor<br />
<strong>of</strong> 'The Cornhill Magazine.' He died in 1863 at the age <strong>of</strong> fifty-two, <strong>of</strong><br />
heart failure.<br />
The great contrast between Dickens and Thackeray results chiefly from the<br />
predominance in Thackeray <strong>of</strong> the critical intellectual quality and <strong>of</strong> the<br />
somewhat fastidious instinct <strong>of</strong> the man <strong>of</strong> society and <strong>of</strong> the world which<br />
Dickens so conspicuously lacked. As a man Thackeray was at home and at ease<br />
only among people <strong>of</strong> formal good breeding; he shrank from direct contact<br />
with the common people; in spite <strong>of</strong> his assaults on the frivolity and vice<br />
<strong>of</strong> fashionable society, he was fond <strong>of</strong> it; his spirit was very keenly<br />
analytical; and he would have been chagrined by nothing more than by<br />
seeming to allow his emotion to get the better <strong>of</strong> his judgment. His novels<br />
seem to many readers cynical, because he scrutinizes almost every character<br />
and every group with impartial vigor, dragging forth every fault and every<br />
weakness into the light. On the title page <strong>of</strong> 'Vanity Fair' he proclaims<br />
that it is a novel without a hero; and here, as in some <strong>of</strong> his lesser<br />
works, most <strong>of</strong> the characters are either altogether bad or worthless and<br />
the others very largely weak or absurd, so that the impression <strong>of</strong> human<br />
life which the reader apparently ought to carry away is that <strong>of</strong> a hopeless<br />
chaos <strong>of</strong> selfishness, hypocrisy, and futility. One word, which has <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
been applied to Thackeray, best expresses his attitude--disillusionment.<br />
The last sentences <strong>of</strong> 'Vanity Fair' are characteristic: 'Oh! Vanitas<br />
Vanitatum! which, <strong>of</strong> us is happy in this world? Which <strong>of</strong> us has his desire?<br />
or, having it, is satisfied?--Come, children, let us shut the box and the