02.04.2013 Views

A History of English Literature

A History of English Literature

A History of English Literature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

evolt and became known as 'mad Shelley,' and his schoolfellows delighted<br />

in driving him into paroxysms <strong>of</strong> rage. Already at Eton he read and accepted<br />

the doctrines <strong>of</strong> the French pre-Revolutionary philosophers and their<br />

<strong>English</strong> interpreter William Godwin. He came to believe not only that human<br />

nature is essentially good, but that if left to itself it can be implicitly<br />

trusted; that sin and misery are merely the results <strong>of</strong> the injustice<br />

springing from the institutions <strong>of</strong> society, chief <strong>of</strong> which are organized<br />

government, formal religion, law, and formal marriage; and that the one<br />

essential thing is to bring about a condition where these institutions can<br />

be abolished and where all men may be allowed to follow their own<br />

inclinations. The great advance which has been made since Shelley's time in<br />

the knowledge <strong>of</strong> history and the social sciences throws a pitiless light on<br />

the absurdity <strong>of</strong> this theory, showing that social institutions, terribly<br />

imperfect as they are, are by no means chiefly bad but rather represent the<br />

slow gains <strong>of</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong> years <strong>of</strong> painful progress; none the less the<br />

theory was bound to appeal irresistibly to such an impulsive and<br />

inexperienced idealism as that <strong>of</strong> Shelley. It was really, <strong>of</strong> course, not so<br />

much against social institutions themselves that Shelley revolted as<br />

against their abuses, which were still more flagrantly apparent in his time<br />

than in ours. When he repudiated Christianity and declared himself an<br />

atheist, what he actually had in mind was the perverted parody <strong>of</strong> religion<br />

mainly <strong>of</strong>fered by the Church <strong>of</strong> his time; and, as some one has observed,<br />

when he pronounced for love without marriage it was because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tragedies that he had seen in marriages without love. Much must be ascribed<br />

also to his sheer radicalism--the instinct to fly violently against<br />

whatever was conventionally accepted and violently to flaunt his adherence<br />

to whatever was banned.<br />

In 1810 Shelley entered Oxford, especially exasperated by parental<br />

interference with his first boyish love, and already the author <strong>of</strong> some<br />

crude prose-romances and poetry. In the university he devoted his time<br />

chiefly to investigating subjects not included or permitted in the<br />

curriculum, especially chemistry; and after a few months, having written a<br />

pamphlet on 'The Necessity <strong>of</strong> Atheism' and sent it with conscientious zeal<br />

to the heads <strong>of</strong> the colleges, he was expelled. Still a few months later,<br />

being then nineteen years old, he allowed himself to be led, admittedly<br />

only through pity, into a marriage with a certain Harriet Westbrook, a<br />

frivolous and commonplace schoolgirl <strong>of</strong> sixteen. For the remaining ten<br />

years <strong>of</strong> his short life he, like Byron, was a wanderer, sometimes in<br />

straits for money, though always supported, after some time generously<br />

enough, by his father. At first he tried the career <strong>of</strong> a pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

agitator; going to Ireland he attempted to arouse the people against<br />

<strong>English</strong> tyranny by such devices as scattering copies <strong>of</strong> addresses from his<br />

window in Dublin or launching them in bottles in the Bristol Channel; but<br />

he was soon obliged to flee the country. It is hard, <strong>of</strong> course, to take<br />

such conduct seriously; yet in the midst <strong>of</strong> much that was wild, his<br />

pamphlets contained also much <strong>of</strong> solid wisdom, no small part <strong>of</strong> which has<br />

since been enacted into law.<br />

Unselfish as he was in the abstract, Shelley's enthusiast's egotism and the<br />

unrestraint <strong>of</strong> his emotions rendered him fitful, capricious, unable to<br />

appreciate any point <strong>of</strong> view but his own, and therefore when irritated or<br />

excited capable <strong>of</strong> downright cruelty in concrete cases. The most painful<br />

illustration is afforded by his treatment <strong>of</strong> his first wife. Three years<br />

after his marriage he informed her that he considered the connection at an<br />

end and abandoned her to what proved a few years <strong>of</strong> a wretched existence.<br />

Shelley himself formed a union with Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin, the<br />

daughter <strong>of</strong> his revolutionary teacher. Her sympathetic though extravagant<br />

admiration for his genius, now beginning to express itself in really great

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!