A History of English Literature
A History of English Literature
A History of English Literature
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
to be reabsorbed into tragedy, <strong>of</strong> which in fact it was always only a<br />
special variety.<br />
JOHN LYLY. The first Elizabethan dramatist <strong>of</strong> permanent individual<br />
importance is the comedian John Lyly, <strong>of</strong> whose early success at Court with<br />
the artificial romance 'Euphues' we have already spoken. From 'Euphues'<br />
Lyly turned to the still more promising work <strong>of</strong> writing comedies for the<br />
Court entertainments with which Queen Elizabeth was extremely lavish. The<br />
character <strong>of</strong> Lyly's plays was largely determined by the light and<br />
spectacular nature <strong>of</strong> these entertainments, and further by the fact that on<br />
most occasions the players at Court were boys. These were primarily the<br />
'children [choir-boys] <strong>of</strong> the Queen's Chapel,' who for some generations had<br />
been sought out from all parts <strong>of</strong> England for their good voices and were<br />
very carefully trained for singing and for dramatic performances. The<br />
choir-boys <strong>of</strong> St. Paul's Cathedral, similarly trained, also <strong>of</strong>ten acted<br />
before the Queen. Many <strong>of</strong> the plays given by these boys were <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ordinary sorts, but it is evident that they would be most successful in<br />
dainty comedies especially adapted to their boyish capacity. Such comedies<br />
Lyly proceeded to write, in prose. The subjects are from classical<br />
mythology or history or <strong>English</strong> folk-lore, into which Lyly sometimes weaves<br />
an allegorical presentation <strong>of</strong> court intrigue. The plots are very slight,<br />
and though the structure is decidedly better than in most previous plays,<br />
the humorous sub-actions sometimes have little connection with the main<br />
action. Characterization is still rudimentary, and altogether the plays<br />
present not so much a picture <strong>of</strong> reality as 'a faint moonlight reflection<br />
<strong>of</strong> life.' None the less the best <strong>of</strong> them, such as 'Alexander and Campaspe,'<br />
are delightful in their sparkling delicacy, which is produced partly by the<br />
carefully-wrought style, similar to that <strong>of</strong> 'Euphues,' but less artificial,<br />
and is enhanced by the charming lyrics which are scattered through them.<br />
For all this the elaborate scenery and costuming <strong>of</strong> the Court<br />
entertainments provided a very harmonious background.<br />
These plays were to exert a strong influence on Shakspere's early comedies,<br />
probably suggesting to him: the use <strong>of</strong> prose for comedy; the value <strong>of</strong><br />
snappy and witty dialog; refinement, as well as affectation, <strong>of</strong> style;<br />
lyric atmosphere; the characters and tone <strong>of</strong> high comedy, contrasting so<br />
favorably with the usual coarse farce <strong>of</strong> the period; and further such<br />
details as the employment <strong>of</strong> impudent boy-pages as a source <strong>of</strong> amusement.<br />
PEELE, GREENE, AND KYD. Of the most important early contemporaries <strong>of</strong><br />
Shakspere we have already mentioned two as noteworthy in other fields <strong>of</strong><br />
literature. George Peele's masque-like 'Arraignment <strong>of</strong> Paris' helps to show<br />
him as more a lyric poet than a dramatist. Robert Greene's plays,<br />
especially 'Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay,' reveal, like his novels, some<br />
real, though not very elaborate, power <strong>of</strong> characterization. They are<br />
especially important in developing the theme <strong>of</strong> romantic love with real<br />
fineness <strong>of</strong> feeling and thus helping to prepare the way for Shakspere in a<br />
very important particular. In marked contrast to these men is Thomas Kyd,<br />
who about the year 1590 attained a meteoric reputation with crude<br />
'tragedies <strong>of</strong> blood,' specialized descendants <strong>of</strong> Senecan tragedy, one <strong>of</strong><br />
which may have been the early play on Hamlet which Shakspere used as the<br />
groundwork for his masterpiece.<br />
CHRISTOPHER MARLOWE, 1564-1593. Peele and Greene were University men who<br />
wrote partly for Court or academic audiences, partly for the popular stage.<br />
The distinction between the two sorts <strong>of</strong> drama was still further broken<br />
down in the work <strong>of</strong> Christopher Marlowe, a poet <strong>of</strong> real genius, decidedly<br />
the chief dramatist among Shakspere's early contemporaries, and the one<br />
from whom Shakspere learned the most.