A History of English Literature
A History of English Literature
A History of English Literature
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
for reelection to Parliament gave him time for concentrated labor on the<br />
'<strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> England' which he had already begun as his crowning work. To it<br />
he thenceforth devoted most <strong>of</strong> his energies, reading and sifting the whole<br />
mass <strong>of</strong> available source-material and visiting the scenes <strong>of</strong> the chief<br />
historical events. The popular success <strong>of</strong> the five volumes which he<br />
succeeded in preparing and published at intervals was enormous. In 1852 he<br />
was reelected to Parliament at Edinburgh, but ill-health resulting from his<br />
long-continued excessive expenditure <strong>of</strong> energy warned him that he had not<br />
long to live. He was made a baron in 1857 and died in 1859, deeply mourned<br />
both because <strong>of</strong> his manly character and because with him perished mostly<br />
unrecorded a knowledge <strong>of</strong> the facts <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong> history more minute,<br />
probably, than that <strong>of</strong> any one else who has ever lived.<br />
Macaulay never married, but, warm-hearted as he was, always lived largely<br />
in his affection for his sisters and for the children <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> them, Lady<br />
Trevelyan. In his public life he displayed as an individual a fearless and<br />
admirable devotion to principle, modified somewhat by the practical<br />
politician's devotion to party. From every point <strong>of</strong> view, his character was<br />
remarkable, though bounded by his very definite limitations.<br />
Least noteworthy among Macaulay's works are his poems, <strong>of</strong> which the 'Lays<br />
<strong>of</strong> Ancient Rome' are chief. Here his purpose is to embody his conception <strong>of</strong><br />
the heroic historical ballads which must have been current among the early<br />
Romans as among the medieval <strong>English</strong>--to recreate these ballads for modern<br />
readers. For this sort <strong>of</strong> verse Macaulay's temperament was precisely<br />
adapted, and the 'Lays' present the simple characters, scenes, and ideals<br />
<strong>of</strong> the early Roman republican period with a sympathetic vividness and in<br />
stirring rhythms which give them an unlimited appeal to boys. None the less<br />
the 'Lays' really make nothing else so clear as that in the true sense <strong>of</strong><br />
the word Macaulay was not at all a poet. They show absolutely nothing <strong>of</strong><br />
the finer feeling which adds so much, for example, to the descriptions in<br />
Scott's somewhat similar romances, and they are separated by all the<br />
breadth <strong>of</strong> the world from the realm <strong>of</strong> delicate sensation and imagination<br />
to which Spenser and Keats and all the genuine poets are native-born.<br />
The power <strong>of</strong> Macaulay's prose works, as no critic has failed to note, rests<br />
on his genius as an orator. For oratory he was rarely endowed. The<br />
composition <strong>of</strong> a speech was for him a matter <strong>of</strong> a few hours; with almost<br />
preternatural mental activity he organized and sifted the material,<br />
commonly as he paced up and down his garden or his room; then, the whole<br />
ready, nearly verbatim, in his mind, he would pass to the House <strong>of</strong> Commons<br />
to hold his colleagues spell-bound during several hours <strong>of</strong> fervid<br />
eloquence. Gladstone testified that the announcement <strong>of</strong> Macaulay's<br />
intention to speak was 'like a trumpet call to fill the benches.' The great<br />
qualities, then, <strong>of</strong> his essays and his '<strong>History</strong>' are those which give<br />
success to the best sort <strong>of</strong> popular oratory--dramatic vividness and<br />
clearness, positiveness, and vigorous, movement and interest. He realizes<br />
characters and situations, on the external side, completely, and conveys<br />
his impression to his readers with scarcely any diminution <strong>of</strong> force. Of<br />
expository structure he is almost as great a master as Burke, though in his<br />
essays and '<strong>History</strong>' the more concrete nature <strong>of</strong> his material makes him<br />
prevailingly a narrator. He sees and presents his subjects as wholes,<br />
enlivening them with realistic details and pictures, but keeping the<br />
subordinate parts subordinate and disposing <strong>of</strong> the less important events in<br />
rapid summaries. Of clear and trenchant, though metallic, narrative and<br />
expository style he is a master. His sentences, whether long or short, are<br />
always lucid; he knows the full value <strong>of</strong> a short sentence suddenly snapped<br />
out after a prolonged period; and no other writer has ever made such'<br />
frequent and striking (though somewhat monotonous) use <strong>of</strong> deliberate