A History of English Literature
A History of English Literature
A History of English Literature
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
already indicated, <strong>of</strong> Shakspere's authorship <strong>of</strong> the plays and poems. No<br />
theory, further, could be more preposterous, to any one really acquainted<br />
with literature, than the idea that the imaginative poetry <strong>of</strong> Shakspere was<br />
produced by the essentially scientific and prosaic mind <strong>of</strong> Francis Bacon.<br />
As to the cipher systems supposed to reveal hidden messages in the plays:<br />
First, no poet bending his energies to the composition <strong>of</strong> such masterpieces<br />
as Shakspere's could possibly concern himself at the same time with weaving<br />
into them a complicated and trifling cryptogram. Second, the cipher systems<br />
are absolutely arbitrary and unscientific, applied to any writings whatever<br />
can be made to 'prove' anything that one likes, and indeed have been<br />
discredited in the hands <strong>of</strong> their own inventors by being made to 'prove'<br />
far too much. Third, it has been demonstrated more than once that the<br />
verbal coincidences on which the cipher systems rest are no more numerous<br />
than the law <strong>of</strong> mathematical probabilities requires. Aside from actually<br />
vicious pursuits, there can be no more melancholy waste <strong>of</strong> time than the<br />
effort to demonstrate that Shakspere is not the real author <strong>of</strong> his reputed<br />
works.]<br />
NATIONAL LIFE FROM 1603 TO 1660. We have already observed that, as<br />
Shakspere's career suggests, there was no abrupt change in either life or<br />
literature at the death <strong>of</strong> Queen Elizabeth in 1603; and in fact the<br />
Elizabethan period <strong>of</strong> literature is <strong>of</strong>ten made to include the reign <strong>of</strong><br />
James I, 1603-1625 (the Jacobean period [Footnote: 'Jaco'bus' is the Latin<br />
form <strong>of</strong> 'James.']), or even, especially in the case <strong>of</strong> the drama, that <strong>of</strong><br />
Charles I, 1625-1649 (the Carolean period). Certainly the drama <strong>of</strong> all<br />
three reigns forms a continuously developing whole, and should be discussed<br />
as such. None the less the spirit <strong>of</strong> the first half <strong>of</strong> the seventeenth<br />
century came gradually to be widely different from that <strong>of</strong> the preceding<br />
fifty years, and before going on to Shakspere's successors we must stop to<br />
indicate briefly wherein the difference consists and for this purpose to<br />
speak <strong>of</strong> the determining events <strong>of</strong> the period. Before the end <strong>of</strong><br />
Elizabeth's reign, indeed, there had been a perceptible change; as the<br />
queen grew old and morose the national life seemed also to lose its youth<br />
and freshness. Her successor and distant cousin, James <strong>of</strong> Scotland (James I<br />
<strong>of</strong> England), was a bigoted pedant, and under his rule the perennial Court<br />
corruption, striking in, became foul and noisome. The national Church,<br />
instead <strong>of</strong> protesting, steadily identified itself more closely with the<br />
Court party, and its ruling <strong>of</strong>ficials, on the whole, grew more and more<br />
worldly and intolerant. Little by little the nation found itself divided<br />
into two great factions; on the one hand the Cavaliers, the party <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Court, the nobles, and the Church, who continued to be largely dominated by<br />
the Renaissance zest for beauty and, especially, pleasure; and on the other<br />
hand the Puritans, comprising the bulk <strong>of</strong> the middle classes, controlled by<br />
the religious principles <strong>of</strong> the Reformation, <strong>of</strong>ten, in their opposition to<br />
Cavalier frivolity, stern and narrow, and more and more inclined to<br />
separate themselves from the <strong>English</strong> Church in denominations <strong>of</strong> their own.<br />
The breach steadily widened until in 1642, under the arbitrary rule <strong>of</strong><br />
Charles I, the Civil War broke out. In three years the Puritan Parliament<br />
was victorious, and in 1649 the extreme minority <strong>of</strong> the Puritans, supported<br />
by the army, took the unprecedented step <strong>of</strong> putting King Charles to death,<br />
and declared England a Commonwealth. But in four years more the<br />
Parliamentary government, bigoted and inefficient, made itself impossible,<br />
and then for five years, until his death, Oliver Cromwell strongly ruled<br />
England as Protector. Another year and a half <strong>of</strong> chaos confirmed the nation<br />
in a natural reaction, and in 1660 the unworthy Stuart race was restored in<br />
the person <strong>of</strong> the base and frivolous Charles II. The general influence <strong>of</strong><br />
the forces which produced these events shows clearly in the changing tone<br />
<strong>of</strong> the drama, the work <strong>of</strong> those dramatists who were Shakspere's later<br />
contemporaries and successors.