A History of English Literature
A History of English Literature
A History of English Literature
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
usage; some are Biblical or other archaisms; others spring mainly from<br />
Carlyle's own amazing mind. His purpose in employing, in the denunciation<br />
<strong>of</strong> shams and insincerities, a form itself so far removed from directness<br />
and simplicity was in part, evidently, to shock people into attention; but<br />
after all, the style expresses appropriately his genuine sense <strong>of</strong> the<br />
incoherence and irony <strong>of</strong> life, his belief that truth can be attained only<br />
by agonizing effort, and his contempt for intellectual and spiritual<br />
commonplaceness.<br />
In 1834 Carlyle moved to London, to a house in Cheyne (pronounced Cheeny)<br />
Row, Chelsea, where he lived for his remaining nearly fifty years. Though<br />
he continued henceforth in large part to reiterate the ideas <strong>of</strong> 'Sartor<br />
Resartus,' he now turned from biography, essays, and literary criticism to<br />
history, and first published 'The French Revolution.' He had almost decided<br />
in despair to abandon literature, and had staked his fortune on this work;<br />
but when the first volume was accidentally destroyed in manuscript he<br />
proceeded with fine courage to rewrite it, and he published the whole book<br />
in 1837. It brought him the recognition which he sought. Like 'Sartor<br />
Resartus' it has much subjective coloring, which here results in<br />
exaggeration <strong>of</strong> characters and situations, and much fantasy and<br />
grotesqueness <strong>of</strong> expression; but as a dramatic and pictorial vilification<br />
<strong>of</strong> a great historic movement it was and remains unique, and on the whole no<br />
history is more brilliantly enlightening and pr<strong>of</strong>oundly instructive. Here,<br />
as in most <strong>of</strong> his later works, Carlyle throws the emphasis on the power <strong>of</strong><br />
great personalities. During the next years he took advantage <strong>of</strong> his success<br />
by giving courses <strong>of</strong> lectures on literature and history, though he disliked<br />
the task and felt himself unqualified as a speaker. Of these courses the<br />
most important was that on 'Heroes and Hero-Worship,' in which he clearly<br />
stated the doctrine on which thereafter he laid increasing stress, that the<br />
strength <strong>of</strong> humanity is in its strong men, the natural leaders, equipped to<br />
rule by power <strong>of</strong> intellect, <strong>of</strong> spirit, and <strong>of</strong> executive force. Control by<br />
them is government by the fit, whereas modern democracy is government by<br />
the unfit. Carlyle called democracy 'mobocracy' and considered it a mere<br />
bad piece <strong>of</strong> social and political machinery, or, in his own phrase, a mere<br />
'Morrison's pill,' foolishly expected to cure all evils at one gulp. Later<br />
on Carlyle came to express this view, like all his others, with much<br />
violence, but it is worthy <strong>of</strong> serious consideration, not least in twentieth<br />
century America.<br />
Of Carlyle's numerous later works the most important are 'Past and<br />
Present,' in which he contrasts the efficiency <strong>of</strong> certain strong men <strong>of</strong><br />
medieval Europe with the restlessness and uncertainty <strong>of</strong> contemporary<br />
democracy and humanitarianism and attacks modern political economy; 'Oliver<br />
Cromwell's Letters and Speeches,' which revolutionized the general opinion<br />
<strong>of</strong> Cromwell, revealing him as a true hero or strong man instead <strong>of</strong> a<br />
hypocritical fanatic; and 'The <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> Frederick the Great,' an enormous<br />
work which occupied Carlyle for fourteen years and involved thorough<br />
personal examination <strong>of</strong> the scenes <strong>of</strong> Frederick's life and battles. During<br />
his last fifteen years Carlyle wrote little <strong>of</strong> importance, and the violence<br />
<strong>of</strong> his denunciation <strong>of</strong> modern life grew shrill and hysterical. That society<br />
was sadly wrong he was convinced, but he propounded no definite plan for<br />
its regeneration. He had become, however, a much venerated as well as a<br />
picturesque figure; and he exerted a powerful and constructive influence,<br />
not only directly, but indirectly through the preaching <strong>of</strong> his doctrines,<br />
in the main or in part, by the younger essayists and the chief Victorian<br />
poets and novelists, and in America by Emerson, with whom he maintained an<br />
almost lifelong friendship and correspondence. Carlyle died in 1881.<br />
Carlyle was a strange combination <strong>of</strong> greatness and narrowness. Like