A History of English Literature
A History of English Literature
A History of English Literature
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
their own privileges and live in the external life rather than in the life<br />
<strong>of</strong> the spirit. 2. The Middle Class, which includes the bulk <strong>of</strong> the nation.<br />
For them he borrows from German criticism the name 'Philistines,' enemies<br />
<strong>of</strong> the chosen people, and he finds their prevailing traits to be<br />
intellectual and spiritual narrowness and a fatal and superficial<br />
satisfaction with mere activity and material prosperity. 3. 'The Populace,'<br />
the 'vast raw and half-developed residuum.' For them Arnold had sincere<br />
theoretical sympathy (though his temperament made it impossible for him to<br />
enter into the same sort <strong>of</strong> personal sympathy with them as did Ruskin); but<br />
their whole environment and conception <strong>of</strong> life seemed to him hideous. With<br />
his usual uncomplimentary frankness Arnold summarily described the three<br />
groups as 'a materialized upper class, a vulgarized middle class, and a<br />
brutalized lower class.'<br />
For the cure <strong>of</strong> these evils Arnold's proposed remedy was Culture, which he<br />
defined as a knowledge <strong>of</strong> the best that has been thought and done in the<br />
world and a desire to make the best ideas prevail. Evidently this Culture<br />
is not a mere knowledge <strong>of</strong> books, unrelated to the rest <strong>of</strong> life. It has<br />
indeed for its basis a very wide range <strong>of</strong> knowledge, acquired by<br />
intellectual processes, but this knowledge alone Arnold readily admitted to<br />
be 'machinery.' The real purpose and main part <strong>of</strong> Culture is the training,<br />
broadening, and refining <strong>of</strong> the whole spirit, including the emotions as<br />
well as the intellect, into sympathy with all the highest ideals, and<br />
therefore into inward peace and satisfaction. Thus Culture is not<br />
indolently selfish, but is forever exerting itself to 'make the best<br />
ideas'--which Arnold also defined as 'reason and the will, <strong>of</strong><br />
God'--'prevail.'<br />
Arnold felt strongly that a main obstacle to Culture was religious<br />
narrowness. He held that the <strong>English</strong> people had been too much occupied with<br />
the 'Hebraic' ideal <strong>of</strong> the Old Testament, the interest in morality or right<br />
conduct, and though he agreed that this properly makes three quarters <strong>of</strong><br />
life, he insisted that it should be joined with the Hellenic (Greek) ideal<br />
<strong>of</strong> a perfectly rounded nature. He found the essence <strong>of</strong> Hellenism expressed<br />
in a phrase which he took from Swift, 'Sweetness and Light,' interpreting<br />
Sweetness to mean the love <strong>of</strong> Beauty, material and spiritual, and Light,<br />
unbiased intelligence; and he urged that these forces be allowed to have<br />
the freest play. He vigorously attacked the Dissenting denominations,<br />
because he believed them to be a conspicuous embodiment <strong>of</strong> Philistine lack<br />
<strong>of</strong> Sweetness and Light, with an unlovely insistence on unimportant external<br />
details and a fatal blindness to the meaning <strong>of</strong> real beauty and real<br />
spirituality. Though he himself was without a theological creed, he was,<br />
and held that every <strong>English</strong>man should be, a devoted adherent <strong>of</strong> the <strong>English</strong><br />
Church, as a beautiful, dignified, and national expression <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
religion, and therefore a very important influence for Culture.<br />
Toward democracy Arnold took, not Carlyle's attitude <strong>of</strong> definite<br />
opposition, but one <strong>of</strong> questioning scrutiny. He found that one actual<br />
tendency <strong>of</strong> modern democracy was to 'let people do as they liked,' which,<br />
given the crude violence <strong>of</strong> the Populace, naturally resulted in lawlessness<br />
and therefore threatened anarchy. Culture, on the other hand, includes the<br />
strict discipline <strong>of</strong> the will and the sacrifice <strong>of</strong> one's own impulses for<br />
the good <strong>of</strong> all, which means respect for Law and devotion to the State.<br />
Existing democracy, therefore, he attacked with unsparing irony, but he did<br />
not condemn its principle. One critic has said that 'his ideal <strong>of</strong> a State<br />
can best be described as an Educated Democracy, working by Collectivism in<br />
Government, Religion and Social Order.' But in his own writings he scarcely<br />
gives expression to so definite a conception.