04.04.2013 Views

Vyacheslav Ivanov and C.M. Bowra: a ... - UCL Discovery

Vyacheslav Ivanov and C.M. Bowra: a ... - UCL Discovery

Vyacheslav Ivanov and C.M. Bowra: a ... - UCL Discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

made possible his election to the Oxford Chair of Poetry in 1946. 22 As we shall see<br />

below, <strong>Bowra</strong> sent all three books to <strong>Ivanov</strong>, who responded with interesting comments<br />

on each. In 1948 he published A Second Book of Russian Verse, including two new<br />

translations of <strong>Ivanov</strong>. In The Creative Experiment (1948) he continued to pursue his<br />

interest in Russian poetry, comprising studies of Mayakovskii <strong>and</strong> Pasternak alongside<br />

Cavafy, Apollinaire, Eliot, Lorca <strong>and</strong> Alberti. In The Romantic Imagination (1950) he<br />

published his lectures on the English Romantic poets, delivered during his second stay at<br />

Harvard in 1948-49. His next work, Heroic Poetry (1952), dedicated to Isaiah Berlin,<br />

provided an ambitious anatomy of heroic poetry, based on the comparative study of<br />

ancient <strong>and</strong> modern heroic verse, including Slavonic works. In Inspiration <strong>and</strong> Poetry<br />

(1955) he analysed the treatment of inspiration in the verse of a wide range of poets,<br />

including Horace, Dante, Milton, Hölderlin, Pushkin, Lermontov <strong>and</strong> Thomas Hardy.<br />

Both str<strong>and</strong>s of publications reflect <strong>Bowra</strong>'s constant endeavour to ‘revive for<br />

the modern world the inner life of the Greeks’ <strong>and</strong> of other cultures, whether through<br />

scholarly editions, translations or more popular works. 23 Although his output was<br />

prolific, his textual scholarship has been criticised, 24 <strong>and</strong> his writing has been described<br />

as ‘flat, pedestrian, lucid, well-ordered, but, at times, conventional’. 25 Most memoirists<br />

agree that <strong>Bowra</strong>'s written work did not live up to the charismatic brilliance <strong>and</strong> wit<br />

which revealed themselves in his personal letters, private verse, <strong>and</strong> above all in his<br />

conversation. As Isaiah Berlin wrote, ‘those who know him solely through his published<br />

works can have no inkling of his genius’. 26 It is certainly clear from <strong>Ivanov</strong>'s<br />

correspondence with <strong>Bowra</strong> that their two meetings in 1947 <strong>and</strong> 1948 played a more<br />

22 Lloyd-Jones, ‘British Academy Memoir’, 31.<br />

23 <strong>Bowra</strong>, Memories, 257.<br />

24 Lloyd-Jones, ‘British Academy Memoir’, 28.<br />

25 Berlin, ‘Memorial Address in St Mary’s’, 18.<br />

26 Ibid.<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!