The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1901.] THE LOCOMOTIVE. 107<br />
the results are almost as good with poor as with good grades of coal; but, of course, the<br />
better the coal, the less the quantity of it required. By passing the fuel into the fur-<br />
nace by means of a stream of air the elements of combustion are brought under perfect<br />
and convenient control, and one great advantage of the automatic stoker is attained, in<br />
that there is no opening of fire doors. That the combustion may take place under<br />
ideal conditions is evident from the fact that powdered coal has been burned with the<br />
proportion of 12 pounds of air per pound of coal, which is precisely the theoretical<br />
chemical requirement. We have also records of continuous tests showing 18 per cent,<br />
of carbonic acid gas from flue-gas analysis of a powdered-fuel boiler. With conditions<br />
such as these, or approaching them, increased evaporation may be expected, and is in<br />
fact obtained, over that from the same fuel burned on grates with a necessarily large<br />
excess of air. With powdered fuel there are no clinkers; the ash is apparently as fine<br />
as the powdered coal, and it may be removed through pipes.<br />
Assurance is given that lignite will work satisfactorily when pulverized, although<br />
there are no authenticated records at hand confirming it. We have seen the fact<br />
demonstrated, that very poor coal works almost as well in this process as better coal,<br />
when the conditions are adjusted as they should be. <strong>The</strong>re seems to be no difficultv in<br />
igniting the powdered fuel, and while it is convenient to retain the ordinary grates<br />
upon which to start a wood fire, as a preliminary to the dust firing, they are not<br />
absolutely necessary and might be removed ; but where they are retained in the boiler,<br />
the change back to grate firing may be easily and quickly accomplished, if for any<br />
reason it becomes necessary. As to reliability, one experimenter informs us that he has<br />
operated a stationary boiler with powdered fuel, continuously, day and night, for four<br />
months, without any difficulty.<br />
If we look for the disadvantages of the system, two come to the front, and both<br />
appear possible to overcome. First, there is the cost of grinding the coal ; but this may<br />
be safely figured at 25 cents per ton or less, although several early experiments were<br />
terminated on account of the expense of this part of the process. With one type of<br />
grinder now in use, one horse-power is said to be sufficient to grind 100 pounds of coal<br />
per hour. <strong>The</strong> fineness of grinding differs among. the different systems, and ranges<br />
from 200 mesh to impalpable powder. Great difficulty was formerly found in grinding<br />
moist coal, but this has apparently been overcome. Second, after the completion of the<br />
combustion the ash is left floating in the gases, and it must be given time to settle, or<br />
it will pass out of the stack as an annoying product. Careful examination of this matter<br />
appears to indicate that with the usual flame-way supplied by the ordinary cylindrical,<br />
return-tube boiler, a sufficient distance is provided in which the dust will settle before<br />
going into the tubes. Probably the change of direction of the gases at the back end of<br />
the boiler contributes to this result, because in a boiler of this kind there appears to be<br />
no more accumulation of dust in the tubes than in a grate-fired boiler, and there appears<br />
to be no evidence of dust about the stack. It is believed that there need be no diffi-<br />
culty from the ash in this type of boiler; but what the experience with locomotive or<br />
marine firing may be is yet to be learned. It has been tried in both of these services,<br />
but thus far its complete success has not been demonstrated in either.<br />
<strong>The</strong> fundamental principles for the successful use of powdered coal appear to be:<br />
(1) a combustion chamber maintained at a high temperature, which requires a fire-brick<br />
arch to prevent the flame from impinging at once against the heating surfaces; (2) the<br />
powdered fuel must be thoroughly mixed with the entering air, so that the air will<br />
surround the particles of coal, and the fuel must be delivered in an uninterrupted stream ;<br />
and (3) the particles of fuel must be maintained suspended in the gases until they are