The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1901.] THE LOCOMOTIVE. 137<br />
the Minerva on the run home. This should have given the former a substantial increase<br />
in speed, whereas there was a slight decrease. This extra indicated horse power must<br />
have been absorbed either in the engines, or on the main shaft's bearings, or in the hull.<br />
It is possible that the shape of the hull may have had something to do in the matter,<br />
but former trials do not bear this out. For example, when the Highflyer (same class)<br />
was tried against the Minerva last year, the former maintained a higher power and speed,<br />
except at 10 knots, when she had to exert more indicated horse power to obtain the<br />
speed.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Controller of the Navy, in his conclusion, significantly remarks that this last<br />
feature of the Belleville boilers requires investigation. Although these trials were not<br />
conducted under the most satisfactory conditions, yet they conclusively established the<br />
relative merits and disadvantages of the two types of boilers, and the cylindrical boiler<br />
has issued from the ordeal with the greatest success. It has been proved to be far more<br />
economical, in every respect, than the water-tube boiler. — Scientific American.<br />
Shop Foremen.<br />
Some years ago John Richards delivered a series of lectures before the students of<br />
Leland Stanford Junior University, at Palo Alto, California, his subject being, "Works<br />
Administration." <strong>The</strong>se lectures contain much that is interesting and valuable to others<br />
besides students; in fact, much that can be made better use of by shopmen than by students.<br />
<strong>The</strong> following is what he had to say in one of these lectures on "Shop Foremen":<br />
In the first lecture the ideal foreman was mentioned as a mythical person, and is so<br />
if he be expected to perform the duties commonly ascribed to this position; but at this<br />
day a good many of the duties once performed by a foreman have disajupeared. <strong>The</strong><br />
draftsmen have taken his place. I can remember very well when a foreman gave out all<br />
kinds of instructions for the work in the smaller machine shops in this country. <strong>The</strong><br />
drawings, if any at all, for use in the machine shop consisted of general elevations in<br />
two planes, abundantly tinted in colors, but with no dimensions marked. <strong>The</strong>se were<br />
supplied to the foreman, who laid out the work, and every little thing had to come under<br />
his notice.<br />
He was responsible for the work, for the performance of the workmen, and for the<br />
proprietors also, because the supplies, discipline, and everything throughout were under<br />
his charge. He alone was responsible in an executive sense, and the man on whom all<br />
depended. He got the credit of success, and bore all the odium of mistakes and<br />
failures.<br />
With detail drawings came new conditions. <strong>The</strong> foreman interpreted the drawings<br />
when they were obscure, but responsibility was shifted to the drafting room, and to<br />
specifications; but the foreman found still quite enough to do in other ways, and remain-<br />
ed an authority for many things that cannot enter into drawings; but under the present<br />
system in machine works the general foreman's executive duties have gone over to a<br />
manager and special foreman, or leading workmen set over departments.<br />
I think useful suggestions may arise out of some personal experience in respect to<br />
foremen. I had the misfortune to rise to this function at eighteen years of age; not<br />
over a great charge, but one of some responsibility, and from then on for twenty years<br />
or more I was associated with the methods of a general foreman, and could not help<br />
noticing various " hitches " that arose in that system.<br />
<strong>The</strong>n occurred some experience in Europe, where the methods of organization were<br />
different, and not applicable, as I supposed, in this country; but in 1884, when a business