14.05.2013 Views

The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog

The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog

The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1901.] THE LOCOMOTIVE. 137<br />

the Minerva on the run home. This should have given the former a substantial increase<br />

in speed, whereas there was a slight decrease. This extra indicated horse power must<br />

have been absorbed either in the engines, or on the main shaft's bearings, or in the hull.<br />

It is possible that the shape of the hull may have had something to do in the matter,<br />

but former trials do not bear this out. For example, when the Highflyer (same class)<br />

was tried against the Minerva last year, the former maintained a higher power and speed,<br />

except at 10 knots, when she had to exert more indicated horse power to obtain the<br />

speed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Controller of the Navy, in his conclusion, significantly remarks that this last<br />

feature of the Belleville boilers requires investigation. Although these trials were not<br />

conducted under the most satisfactory conditions, yet they conclusively established the<br />

relative merits and disadvantages of the two types of boilers, and the cylindrical boiler<br />

has issued from the ordeal with the greatest success. It has been proved to be far more<br />

economical, in every respect, than the water-tube boiler. — Scientific American.<br />

Shop Foremen.<br />

Some years ago John Richards delivered a series of lectures before the students of<br />

Leland Stanford Junior University, at Palo Alto, California, his subject being, "Works<br />

Administration." <strong>The</strong>se lectures contain much that is interesting and valuable to others<br />

besides students; in fact, much that can be made better use of by shopmen than by students.<br />

<strong>The</strong> following is what he had to say in one of these lectures on "Shop Foremen":<br />

In the first lecture the ideal foreman was mentioned as a mythical person, and is so<br />

if he be expected to perform the duties commonly ascribed to this position; but at this<br />

day a good many of the duties once performed by a foreman have disajupeared. <strong>The</strong><br />

draftsmen have taken his place. I can remember very well when a foreman gave out all<br />

kinds of instructions for the work in the smaller machine shops in this country. <strong>The</strong><br />

drawings, if any at all, for use in the machine shop consisted of general elevations in<br />

two planes, abundantly tinted in colors, but with no dimensions marked. <strong>The</strong>se were<br />

supplied to the foreman, who laid out the work, and every little thing had to come under<br />

his notice.<br />

He was responsible for the work, for the performance of the workmen, and for the<br />

proprietors also, because the supplies, discipline, and everything throughout were under<br />

his charge. He alone was responsible in an executive sense, and the man on whom all<br />

depended. He got the credit of success, and bore all the odium of mistakes and<br />

failures.<br />

With detail drawings came new conditions. <strong>The</strong> foreman interpreted the drawings<br />

when they were obscure, but responsibility was shifted to the drafting room, and to<br />

specifications; but the foreman found still quite enough to do in other ways, and remain-<br />

ed an authority for many things that cannot enter into drawings; but under the present<br />

system in machine works the general foreman's executive duties have gone over to a<br />

manager and special foreman, or leading workmen set over departments.<br />

I think useful suggestions may arise out of some personal experience in respect to<br />

foremen. I had the misfortune to rise to this function at eighteen years of age; not<br />

over a great charge, but one of some responsibility, and from then on for twenty years<br />

or more I was associated with the methods of a general foreman, and could not help<br />

noticing various " hitches " that arose in that system.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n occurred some experience in Europe, where the methods of organization were<br />

different, and not applicable, as I supposed, in this country; but in 1884, when a business

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!