The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
84 THE LOCOMOTIVE. [June,<br />
present case the stretch due to the force S l in the outer shell is given by the following<br />
equation :<br />
3.1416 A/?, = 3.1416i?j x S x h, or<br />
x<br />
AR =R S k.<br />
1 1 l<br />
In the same way we find that the stretch of the inner sheet is<br />
A 7? 2 = B. 2 SJ:<br />
Passing now to the stay-bolt, we note that its original length (neglecting the ends<br />
that are within the sheets) is li — R , and that the tension to which it is subjected, per<br />
1 2<br />
square inch of its sectional area, is T. Hence, if we assume that the material of which<br />
the stay-bolt is made has substantially the same resistance to stretching as the material<br />
of the sheets, we shall find that the increase in the length of the stay-bolt is<br />
Fig. 5.<br />
—<br />
,..,_<br />
Illustrating the Stretch<br />
op the Shells.<br />
(R 1 — B!l)Tk<br />
But since the stay-bolt is secured to the<br />
sheets, its stretch must be precisely<br />
equal to A if, — A R .<br />
2 as will be seen<br />
upon examining the diagram, Fig. 5.<br />
Hence<br />
(/?! — R ) 2 Tk= Ai?!— Ai? -<br />
2<br />
But we have already obtained the values<br />
of AR t and AR 2 , and<br />
(i?,-i? 2<br />
) T=R S - R S .<br />
l l 2 2<br />
if we substitute<br />
these in the equation last given, we have<br />
(./?, — R%) -T k = Z?j Si k— R 2 S 2 kj<br />
or, dividing through by k,<br />
Substituting in this equation the values of 8 t and S 2 already found, we have<br />
{R X -R<br />
2)T t 1 A t., A<br />
(PA — Ta) « " (TaR — t :<br />
and upon solving this equation for T we have<br />
PAR.) R s .<br />
PA(t 2 2V + *i -K 2<br />
3 )<br />
T =<br />
a ifj (*, i?x + t<br />
t Rs ) + ht s A (i? — x R2 )<br />
which is the formula given for T in the earlier article.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se formulae may be tested for special cases, if their trustworthiness is doubted.<br />
Thus if we make a = ,<br />
we see that T remains finite, and hence the total pull on the<br />
stay-bolt (Ta) vanishes, as it should. Making a — in the formulas for S x and S 2 , we<br />
find (since Ta — 0) that<br />
PR —PR X<br />
2<br />
Si = — f— and S = s 1—<br />
which are correct ,for this case. (It will be observed that S 2 , being negative, is now<br />
xomj)ressive stress.)<br />
'